That is 0 articles you have read today.
The Aporia is free and carries no advertising, so readers are the only
thing paying for it. If you are getting this much out of it, a small
donation is what keeps it independent.
Daily limit reached
You have read 0 articles today.
That is more than the 15 a day The Aporia gives away,
and well past what it can carry on nothing. Your allowance resets at
midnight.
There is no advertising here and nothing about you is sold, so readers
are the only thing paying for it. If the site is worth this much of
your day, it is worth a few dollars.
Everything else stays open: the
maps, the
directory and
search do
not count against this, and neither does re-opening something you have
already read today.
Earl Spencer asserts that while he could write a critical account of the royal family, his book "Swan Song: Diana, My Sister" does not intend to be a hit piece against King Charles. The memoir includes allegations such as the king expressing relief at Diana's death and using insensitive language regarding her funeral procession. Buckingham Palace issued a response defending the monarch’s character, while former tabloid editor Piers Morgan has accused Spencer of defamation over an error in his book concerning a photograph publication.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-23,
using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the
same event (that is the story summary below).
Story summary
Charles Spencer, Earl Spencer, has stated he could write a "hit piece on the royal family" but emphasized it was not a threat and that he would not actually do so. His comments come in response to Piers Morgan's claim that the royal family is upset over his new book Swan Song: Diana, My Sister, which details allegations against them regarding Princess Diana’s life. Earl Spencer defended his work by saying it was necessary to provide context for certain events involving Diana and insisted his goal was to celebrate her memory rather than harm others' reputations. The book has garnered significant attention globally due to its critical stance towards the monarchy, particularly concerning statements made about Princess Diana when she was alive.
Written for “Royal Family Controversy” on 2026-10-04,
grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Earl Spencer has said he could write a “hit piece on the royal family” but said it was not a threat as he would not put pen to paper.
uncertain
he → say → paper
Charles Spencer’s controversial book about his sister Diana, Princess of Wales has made headlines around the world for its string of allegations against the monarch, but he insisted it was not a “hit piece on the King”.
asserted
it → make → King
Former tabloid editor Piers Morgan has claimed the royal family are “spitting blood” over Earl Spencer’s memoir about Diana – called Swan Song: Diana, My Sister – and that he wants to “destroy” the reputation of the King.
“It was impossible to give the full story of Diana’s life without putting in context certain things.
“This is not a threat at all because I’m not going to do it, if I wanted to write a hit piece on the royal family, I could do that – that’s not my job.
“My job in this book was to celebrate Diana, it’s exactly the same as with the eulogy.
uncertain
it → claim → eulogy
“By doing that, other people are going to come off not as well as they might want to.”
uncertain
they → do → that
Earl Spencer claims in his book that the King, then the Prince of Wales, said about Diana “we’ll forget her soon enough” during an argument over whether the then Princes William and Harry should walk behind their mother’s coffin in her funeral procession.
uncertain
William → claim → procession
The memoir also alleges the King “sounded giddily elated – like a lottery winner” when he spoke to the earl after Diana’s death.
asserted
he → allege → death
In a strongly worded response, Buckingham Palace said the King was “mindful that the pain of fraternal grief can cloud reason, affect judgement and colour memory in ways others do not recognise, even many years after such a loss”.
asserted
others → word → loss
When asked by Lorraine if he stood by everything he said about the King, the earl replied: “Yes, so I would like to explain, I wasn’t setting out to do a hit piece on the King at all.
asserted
I → ask → King
“The bits that have been included in the book are totally in context.”
asserted
that → include → context
The earl repeated his apology after wrongly suggesting in his book that Mr Morgan was responsible for publishing photographs, taken with hidden cameras, of Diana in a leotard working out at the gym, in the Daily Mirror newspaper in 1993.
asserted
Diana → repeat → 1993
Read More
Mr Morgan was working at The Sun at the time, and did not join the Mirror as its editor until 1995.
He said: “I mean, unlike some journalists we know, I’m very happy to acknowledge I made a small error and I’ve apologised and it will be put right in the second edition, but that’s it.”
asserted
that → read → edition
Mr Morgan has called on Diana’s brother to pulp the remaining copies of his book and instructed his lawyers to demand the work be pulled from sale immediately.
asserted
work → call → sale
He reacted to the earl describing his mistake as a “small error” during an appearance on the Channel 5 show Jeremy Vine, saying: “I don’t think that’s a small error, nor do my lawyers, it’s a serious defamation.”
asserted
it → react → show
Mr Morgan said: “I’m not professing to be the Mother Teresa of Fleet Street in all the time I worked there, and I didn’t never make mistakes myself, but this is a very, very big mistake and I think he’s done it in a way that’s incredibly casual.”
asserted
that → say → way
The earl said he did not talk to any members of the royal family about his book as he wanted to take “full responsibility” for its contents and it was not a “book by committee”.
asserted
it → say → committee
He added: “So I told both William and Harry and my sisters earlier on the day that it was released, as a piece of news, that the book was coming out.”
asserted
book → add → news
Asked by Lorraine if he could be a mediator in the long-running rift between Diana’s sons, the earl said: “But I’ve never presumed to be involved in that.
uncertain
I → ask → that
“Everyone watching has probably knowledge of family rifts, they’re so personal, there’s so much we don’t know about in any family rift, and it’s just down to the individuals to deal with it how they want and I would never presume to advise on that.”
asserted
I → watch → that
The Aporia
