The FBI Anti-Corruption Squad Was Circling Susan Collins — Until Trump Got in the Way

Read the original at ProPublica ↗
ProPublica · collected 2026-09-22 · by Kirsten Berg

Quick Summary

In late 2019, Senator Susan Collins faced a significant risk of losing her Senate seat due to President Trump's low approval ratings and fundraising difficulties. Scott Reed, head of Collins' super PAC, met with executives from Hawaiian defense contractor Navatek at a Washington D.C. coffee shop where he solicited a $500,000 donation on behalf of the senator. The company planned to funnel the money through a shell corporation to avoid legal repercussions and in exchange for federal contracts worth tens of millions of dollars. Three years later, facing criminal charges himself, Navatek’s CEO Martin Kao confessed this scheme to FBI agents and prosecutors, leading to an investigation that was ultimately halted when Trump returned to office and purged the FBI, preventing further revelations about political corruption.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-22, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

In late 2019, as Senator Susan Collins faced potential defeat due to President Donald Trump's low approval ratings and fundraising struggles, her top fundraiser Scott Reed met with executives from the Hawaiian defense company Navatek at a Corner Bakery in Washington D.C. The FBI was investigating possible pay-to-play activities involving Navatek and Sen. Collins around this time. According to emails obtained by ProPublica, one of Reed’s subordinates contacted a Navatek lobbyist shortly after funds were transferred from Kao's shell company to the Collins super PAC, asking for Kao's phone number so that Senator Collins could thank him. The FBI was on the verge of launching a comprehensive investigation into these interactions when Trump returned to office in 2024 and halted the probe as part of his broader effort to overhaul the FBI, effectively ending the inquiry into potential criminal bribery involving Sen. Collins and Navatek.

Written for “Trump Interferes With Investigations” on 2026-10-05, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
326
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
6%
19 of 326 hedged
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Correction & hedging signals
95.7
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-22 · how these are computed

Story

📰 Trump Interferes With Investigations
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 6% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 10% hedged 3 of 31 📰 publisher trust 59
“Article A describes an investigation involving interactions between Sen. Susan Collins and a top donor that was shut down after Trump returned to office, while Article B specifies details about a former CEO of a defense contractor confessing to attempting to bribe Sen. Collins using shell companies and straw donors.”
ABC News (US)
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 10% hedged 2 of 20 📰 publisher trust 59
“Article A describes the initial investigation and shutdown of a corruption probe involving Susan Collins, while Article B focuses on Collins' denial of allegations made in a ProPublica report regarding the same probe.”

Publisher

ProPublica · 72 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Kirsten Berg
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 More consequentially, for the company to offer donations to Collins in exchange for an official action, or for Collins to accept, would constitute criminal bribery.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Collins Corner Bakery FBI Maine Navatek

Subjects

Collins PERSON · 9× Navatek ORG · 8× FBI ORG · 5× Kao PERSON · 5× Reed PERSON · 4× Corner Bakery ORG · 3× Maine GPE · 3× Washington ORG · 3× Donald Trump PERSON · 2× Susan Collins PERSON · 2×

Narrative

Seven days after the super PAC cashed the check from Kao’s shell company, one of Reed’s subordinates emailed a Navatek lobbyist asking for Kao’s phone number: “Senator Collins would like to call Martin to thank him.” The Navatek Method Before Kao’s doomed reign as CEO, Navatek was a sleepy Hawaiian engineering company with a few dozen employees.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-22
🔮 More consequentially, for the company to offer donations to Collins in exchange for an official action, or for Collins to accept, would constitute criminal bribery.

Claims (326 extracted, 19 hedged)

Reporting Highlights - Probe: In 2024, the FBI sought to launch a sweeping pay-to-play investigation examining interactions between Sen. Susan Collins and a top donor, records and emails show. asserted
records → seek → Collins
- Confession: The donor, an ex-defense contractor, told agents his company won millions in federal contracts by bankrolling campaigns of powerful politicians. asserted
company → tell → politicians
- Shutdown: After Donald Trump returned to office, the investigation died, a casualty of his purge of the FBI. asserted
investigation → return → FBI
Its closure shut a potential window into how Washington works. asserted
Washington → shut → window
These highlights were written by the reporters and editors who worked on this story. asserted
who → write → story
In the final weeks of 2019, a top fundraiser for Sen. Susan Collins walked into a perilous meeting at a Corner Bakery in Washington, D.C. For the first time in her two-decade Senate career, the Republican lawmaker from Maine was in danger of losing her seat. asserted
lawmaker → walk → seat
President Donald Trump’s dismal approval ratings were dragging her down in the polls, and she was falling behind her likely 2020 Democratic challenger in fundraising. asserted
she → drag → fundraising
Scott Reed, head of the Collins super PAC, was on a mission to close that gap. asserted
Reed → close → gap
Reed was meeting that day with three executives from a Hawaiian defense contractor, Navatek. asserted
Reed → meet → contractor
A year earlier, Collins had helped their company land a multimillion-dollar Navy research contract in Maine. asserted
company → help → Maine
Now, seated at a coffee shop not far from the U.S. Capitol, Reed asked them for a $500,000 donation. asserted
Reed → seat → donation
Government contractors are banned from making political contributions. asserted
contractors → ban → contributions
More consequentially, for the company to offer donations to Collins in exchange for an official action, or for Collins to accept, would constitute criminal bribery. asserted
Collins → offer → bribery
But the company did have such a proposal: Navatek was hungry for more government contracts in Maine. asserted
Navatek → have → Maine
If they cut a big check, the CEO told Reed, Navatek wanted Collins to guarantee tens of millions of dollars in additional federal funding. asserted
Collins → cut → funding
To skirt campaign finance laws and conceal the source of the funds, Navatek planned to funnel the donation through a shell company. asserted
Navatek → skirt → company
The CEO wanted assurance that Collins would know where the money came from. asserted
money → want → where
Reed confirmed that she would, the executive said — and that Navatek would get its government contracts. asserted
Navatek → confirm → contracts
After the Corner Bakery meeting, Navatek’s CEO, Martin Kao, sent an initial $150,000 to the Collins super PAC using the shell company. asserted
CEO → send → company
Two months later, he told Navatek executives that Collins committed to getting the company $32 million in naval contracts, according to an internal company email reviewed by ProPublica. uncertain
Collins → tell → ProPublica
Three years later, Kao holed up in a conference room to recount the Corner Bakery meeting to a group of four FBI agents and federal prosecutors. asserted
Kao → hole → agents
The FBI had seen through his shell company ruse, and in 2022 a grand jury indicted him for making illegal campaign contributions. asserted
jury → see → contributions
No one working for Collins was charged. asserted
one → work → Collins
Facing years in prison, Kao hoped to do less time by revealing the entire scheme. asserted
Kao → face → scheme
What he told them has never before become public. asserted
told → tell → them
The Corner Bakery meeting, he asserted, was just one episode in a sprawling pay-to-play operation that embroiled some of the most powerful figures in Congress. asserted
that → assert → Congress
Over three days at the U.S. attorney’s office in Honolulu, Kao laid out in devastating detail how his operation worked. asserted
operation → lay → detail
He gave agents a 50-page document naming dozens of lobbyists, congressional staffers and members of Congress who he said helped him trade cash for contracts. asserted
he → give → contracts
Kao and his close associates had donated nearly $900,000 to dozens of politicians, allowing Navatek to establish operations in half a dozen states with over $40 million a year in government funding. asserted
Navatek → donate → funding
Do You Have Information About Political Dealmaking in Washington? asserted
You → have → Washington
We’re still reporting on pay-for-play arrangements between powerful companies and elected officials. asserted
We → report → companies
I want to hear from you. asserted
I → want → you
The best way to reach me is on Signal at 804-295-7201. asserted
way → reach → 7201
Most damningly, Kao told FBI agents and prosecutors, the company’s work for the government was of no real value. asserted
work → tell → value
Navatek’s research under his stewardship never resulted in products the military wanted to buy, ProPublica found. asserted
ProPublica → result → products
Kao’s tell-all interviews with the FBI lasted into late 2024. asserted
interviews → tell → 2024
His confessions opened up an entirely new phase of the investigation. asserted
confessions → open → investigation
Agents sifted through hundreds of thousands of records seized during Kao’s arrest and found that many were consistent with his account of widespread influence peddling. asserted
many → sift → peddling
Kao had credibility issues. asserted
Kao → have → issues
He was now a felon trying to avoid a lengthy prison sentence. asserted
He → try → sentence
…and 286 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support