Indepe­ndent power producers found overcharging users through costly coal procurement

Dawn - Home · collected 2026-08-26 · by Khaleeq Kiani
Read the original at Dawn - Home ↗

Summary

The National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) and the power division have found that independent power producers (IPPs) operating on imported coal are overcharging electricity consumers through inefficient coal procurement practices, resulting in an additional burden on consumers. The cost is passed on through monthly fuel price adjustments (FPAs), with some IPPs securing discounts of only $0.20 to $0.50 per tonne compared to a discount of $7.12 per tonne secured by the state-owned Jamshoro Power Plant. Nepra has directed the Port Qasim Electric Power Company to conduct fresh bidding for a long-term coal supply agreement within three months, after finding that it had procured 1.2 million tonnes of coal at a higher rate than what was possible through competitive bidding. The power division estimates that correcting these procurement inefficiencies could save the national exchequer up to Rs380 million annually.
Written by the local model on 2026-08-26, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
19
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
21%
4 of 19 hedged
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher trust
95.2
red-flag proxy, not a credibility rating
Outlets on this story
1
Economy/Business
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-08-26 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan: Independent power producers (IPPs) operating on imported coal have been found overcharging consumers through costly and inefficient coal procurement practices. This has resulted in an additional burden on electricity consumers, who ultimately bear the cost through monthly fuel price adjustments (FPAs). The issue gained prominence after a recent competitive bidding process for coal supply to a state-owned power plant revealed discounts of up to $7.12 per tonne from a Karachi-based supplier, compared to mere 20-50 cents per tonne in some IPP contracts. As a result, the government has identified significant inefficiencies in coal procurement and issued fresh policy guidelines to take corrective action, which could save the national exchequer up to Rs380 million annually.

Written for “Coal Power Pricing Scandal” on 2026-08-31, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.35, but none of the 2 quote(s) it offered could be found in the article text, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 2594: no verified evidence · logged 2026-08-27

Story

📰 Coal Power Pricing Scandal
Economy/Business · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.

Publisher

Dawn - Home · 35 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
SignalValueWeight
Correction rate 0.000 0.4
Uncertainty density 0.096 0.25
Assertive mismatch rate 0.000 0.35
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Khaleeq Kiani
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 This transition would spur greater economic activity while quelling migration of customers to alternative fuels,” the statement said.
🔮 “The power division has identified significant inefficiencies in the procurement of imported coal by power plants,” an official statement said on Tuesday, adding that fresh policy guidelines had been issued “for corrective action that could save the national exchequer up to Rs380 million annually”.
Also by Khaleeq Kiani
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

ISLAMABAD Nepra PQEPC Port Qasim the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority

Subjects

Nepra ORG · 5× PQEPC ORG · 3× Dawn PERSON · 2× Jamshoro GPE · 2× Port Qasim GPE · 2× China GPE · 1× ISLAMABAD GPE · 1× Karachi GPE · 1× Port Qasim Electric Power Company ORG · 1× the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority ORG · 1×

Narrative

While consumer groups have been raising concerns over such practices at various forums, including public hearings, the power division and the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) have now also pointed to inefficiencies in coal procurement and their financial impact on consumers.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-08-26
🔮 “The power division has identified significant inefficiencies in the procurement of imported coal by power plants,” an official statement said on Tuesday, adding that fresh policy guidelines had been issued “for corrective action that could save the national exchequer up to Rs380 million annually”.

Claims (19 extracted, 4 hedged)

Independent power producers (IPPs) operating on imported coal have been found imposing an additional burden on electricity consumers through opaque and inefficient coal procurement practices, with the cost ultimately passed on through monthly fuel price adjustments (FPAs). asserted
cost → operate → adjustments
While consumer groups have been raising concerns over such practices at various forums, including public hearings, the power division and the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) have now also pointed to inefficiencies in coal procurement and their financial impact on consumers. asserted
division → raise → consumers
The issue gained prominence after recent competitive bidding for coal supply to the 660MW state-owned Jamshoro Power Plant attracted a discount of $7.12 per tonne from a Karachi-based supplier compared to discounts of only 20 to 50 cents per tonne in some contracts involving IPPs. asserted
bidding → gain → IPPs
“The power division has identified significant inefficiencies in the procurement of imported coal by power plants,” an official statement said on Tuesday, adding that fresh policy guidelines had been issued “for corrective action that could save the national exchequer up to Rs380 million annually”. uncertain
that → identify → million
In a recent order, Nepra had already pointed out concerns over coal procurement by Port Qasim Electric Power Company (PQEPC) under a six-year contract involving discounts of $0.20 to $0.50 per tonne based on estimated coal prices. asserted
Nepra → point → prices
“This type of evaluation has never been observed in any bidding by any other power plant, including PQEPC, and does not seem justified, as it is based on estimated coal prices, which may change in future,” Nepra said in its judgement. uncertain
Nepra → observe → judgement
The regulator also noted that the Port Qasim plant had published its tender notice only in China instead of reaching out to a broader pool of potential bidders. asserted
plant → note → bidders
“Had discounts been incorporated into the bid evaluation as a major criterion, it may have yielded more competitive and higher discounts from prospective bidders,” Nepra said. uncertain
Nepra → incorporate → bidders
The regulator also observed that the plant had not disclosed that it had already executed a long-term coal supply agreement when the matter was discussed with the regulator on two occasions, prompting “proceedings regarding misstatement and/or non-disclosure of information”. asserted
matter → observe → information
Nepra subsequently directed the Port Qasim plant to conduct fresh bidding for a long-term coal supply agreement within three months of its March 2026 FPA decision. asserted
Nepra → direct → decision
However, officials said that after the March 25 order, the company procured about 1.2 million tonnes of coal, enough for almost an entire year, just before a new tender. asserted
company → say → tender
They said the contract again involved a discount of around $0.50 per tonne against the $7.12 discount secured by the public-sector Jamshoro plant. asserted
contract → say → plant
The difference alone works out to around $8 million, officials said. asserted
officials → work → million
If similar procurement practices were followed by other IPPs, the impact could rise substantially. uncertain
impact → follow → IPPs
The power division said the procurement inefficiencies were identified during a series of meetings presided over by the power minister, where officials reviewed actual data, contractual arrangements and market practices. asserted
officials → say → data
“Pakistan has a significant fleet of coal-fired power plants with a combined capacity of approximately 5,280 megawatts that rely wholly or partly on imported coal. asserted
that → have → coal
These include three major 1,320MW plants at Port Qasim, Hub Power and Sahiwal, as well as the Lucky and Jamshoro plants which also have the capability to use imported coal,” it said. asserted
it → include → coal
The division said coal import prices for IPPs were linked to internationally recognised benchmarks such as the API-4 index, but the final price paid by a plant also depended on the discount negotiated with the supplier. asserted
price → say → supplier
PQEPC Chief Financial Officer Adil Ashraf and Procurement Chief Liang Ding Ping did not respond to Dawn’s written queries. asserted
Ashraf → respond → queries
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support