Idaho Law Protects Faith Healers. It Wasn’t Always That Way.

ProPublica · collected 2026-08-26 · by Audrey Dutton
Read the original at ProPublica ↗

Summary

A reporter examines the history of Idaho's laws regarding faith healers and their children. Prior to 1970s, it was illegal for parents in Idaho to choose prayer over medical care for their children, with penalties including misdemeanor charges and even custodial action by the state. However, since the 1970s, the law has been amended to exempt parents who claim a spiritual belief prohibits lifesaving medical care from being charged with child neglect or manslaughter. From 2015-2025, Idaho's Followers of Christ faith-healing sect experienced 15 preventable deaths of children.
Written by the local model on 2026-08-26, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
44
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
7%
3 of 44 hedged
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher trust
95.4
red-flag proxy, not a credibility rating
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-08-26 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

Idaho's laws regarding child neglect and medical care have undergone significant changes over the years. Until at least the early 1970s, parents who chose prayer over lifesaving medical care for their children could be charged with child neglect or manslaughter. However, a law protecting faith healers was passed, exempting them from prosecution even if their child dies as a result of not receiving medical treatment. This protection has been supported by lawmakers who value "traditional" Idaho values. The change in laws is notable, given that the state's own constitution explicitly limits freedom of religion and prohibits acts "inconsistent with morality or the peace or safety of the state."

Written for “Idaho's Faith Healing Law” on 2026-08-31, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it +0.35, but none of the 1 quote(s) it offered could be found in the article text, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 2464: no verified evidence · logged 2026-08-27

Story

📰 Idaho's Faith Healing Law
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 7% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
ProPublica
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 9% hedged 17 of 192 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A reports on a broader issue and trend (children dying from treatable conditions in a faith-healing sect), while Article B discusses Idaho's law protecting faith healers, which is related but not the same specific event.”

Publisher

ProPublica · 16 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
SignalValueWeight
Correction rate 0.000 0.4
Uncertainty density 0.091 0.25
Assertive mismatch rate 0.000 0.35
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Audrey Dutton
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 “Every parent of any child who willfully omits, without lawful excuse, to furnish necessary food, clothing, shelter, or medical attendance for such child, is guilty of a misdemeanor,” reads the 1887 edition of Idaho territory statutes, published before statehood.
🔮 It would have been treatable with antibiotics and newborn care in a hospital, said doctors who reviewed his death records for ProPublica.
More on this subject from Audrey Dutton

Topics

Followers Idaho Oklahoma ProPublica the Followers of Christ

Subjects

Idaho GPE · 12× Followers PERSON · 3× Pearl PERSON · 3× Christian Science ORG · 2× Annises PERSON · 1× Lurid P. “Lewis” Annis PERSON · 1× Oklahoma GPE · 1× Pearl Annis PERSON · 1× ProPublica ORG · 1× the Followers of Christ ORG · 1×

Narrative

“Every parent of any child who willfully omits, without lawful excuse, to furnish necessary food, clothing, shelter, or medical attendance for such child, is guilty of a misdemeanor,” reads the 1887 edition of Idaho territory statutes, published before statehood.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-08-26
🔮 “Every parent of any child who willfully omits, without lawful excuse, to furnish necessary food, clothing, shelter, or medical attendance for such child, is guilty of a misdemeanor,” reads the 1887 edition of Idaho territory statutes, published before statehood.
2026-08-26 · ProPublica
Idaho Law Protects Faith Healers. It Wasn’t Always That Way. · assertive framing

Claims (44 extracted, 3 hedged)

In Idaho, parents who say their faith prohibits lifesaving medical care for their children can’t be charged with child neglect or manslaughter. asserted
faith → say → neglect
Supporters of this protection over the years have included lawmakers who voiced support for “traditional” Idaho values. asserted
who → include → values
But from at least the 1880s through the early 1970s, it was illegal for parents in Idaho to choose prayer over medical care when a child’s life was at stake, newspaper archives and historical documents show. asserted
archives → choose → stake
“Every parent of any child who willfully omits, without lawful excuse, to furnish necessary food, clothing, shelter, or medical attendance for such child, is guilty of a misdemeanor,” reads the 1887 edition of Idaho territory statutes, published before statehood. asserted
edition → omit → statehood
The statutes included no mention of spiritual belief as a “lawful excuse.” asserted
statutes → include → excuse
Three years later, the state constitution explicitly put limits on Idaho’s freedom of religion. asserted
constitution → put → religion
It would not excuse “acts of licentiousness,” polygamy or other practices “inconsistent with morality or the peace or safety of the state. asserted
It → excuse → state
It wasn’t long before the law came down on members of the Followers of Christ, a faith-healing sect that arrived in Idaho in 1899 and remains active in the state. asserted
that → come → state
From 2015 to 2025, the sect’s congregations in Idaho experienced 15 preventable deaths of children, according to ProPublica’s reporting. uncertain
congregations → experience → reporting
Pearl Annis was a 13-year-old girl whose parents had moved from Oklahoma to Idaho’s Magic Valley in the spring of 1915 with at least one other Followers family. asserted
parents → move → family
The Annises and their 13 children shared “a two-room shack,” a local newspaper reported. asserted
newspaper → share → shack
An officer and a doctor visited the home after neighbors voiced concern. asserted
neighbors → visit → concern
They found Pearl in bed, fully dressed and on the cusp of death. asserted
They → find → death
Her father, Lurid P. “Lewis” Annis, was arrested on a misdemeanor charge of refusing to provide medical attention. asserted
father → arrest → attention
Pearl was taken to the hospital, according to the news story, and died there with what today would be described as septic shock from a bowel blockage. uncertain
what → take → blockage
The newspaper, which didn’t appear to follow up on Annis’ criminal charge, called the Followers church “a religious cult” and Pearl’s death a consequence of “religious mania.” asserted
death → appear → mania
News archives and historic records don’t say how many times Idaho acted on similar cases in the decades after. asserted
Idaho → say → decades
But one legal battle over lifesaving care drew attention in the 1960s, as sickness made its way through a Followers family in a Boise suburb. asserted
sickness → draw → suburb
The mother died in December 1965. asserted
mother → die → December
Her 4-year-old daughter died the following June. asserted
daughter → die → ?
Days after the girl’s death, a judge ordered the state to take custody of her 10-year-old brother under Idaho’s child protection law. asserted
judge → order → law
The boy was admitted to a local hospital with pneumonia, a complication of the measles. asserted
boy → admit → measles
He spent days in critical condition but survived. asserted
He → spend → condition
The judge told the father that to regain custody, he would have to be willing to give the boy medical care as the law required. asserted
law → tell → care
A doctor testified that without the hospitalization, the child “almost certainly would have died,” a newspaper report said. asserted
report → testify → hospitalization
The father’s lawyer told the judge that his sect was rooted in “faith that God will heal the sick.” asserted
God → tell → sick
The law in the 1960s was clear, though: a parent had a duty to protect their child’s health, no exceptions. asserted
parent → have → exceptions
The judge told Samuel’s father: “The law governs conduct. asserted
law → tell → conduct
Religion governs opinion.” asserted
Religion → govern → opinion
But the legal landscape was about to shift. asserted
landscape → shift → ?
It came with little public attention. asserted
It → come → attention
During a full-on rewrite of Idaho’s criminal code in 1971, the Legislature added a section that said the state could not bring endangerment charges against someone “who chooses for his child treatment by prayer or spiritual means alone.” uncertain
who → add → prayer
Legislative records don’t make clear how the wording originated. asserted
wording → make → ?
The passage of another law one year later, affirming the “spiritual means” language and applying it to other crimes, has been credited to the Christian Science church, another Christian denomination with Idaho members. asserted
passage → affirm → members
(The Christian Science website says the church’s practice of “healing in the way Christ Jesus taught” is not “faith healing” and that members are free to choose any form of healthcare. asserted
members → say → healthcare
The church also supported Oregon’s full removal of its faith-healing exemption in 2011.) Faith-healing exemptions soon became widespread nationally. asserted
exemptions → support → 2011
The trigger was the federal Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act of 1974, which set out to standardize the nation’s child welfare system by giving states grants to more effectively investigate reports of child abuse. asserted
which → set → abuse
The Department of Health, Education and Welfare interpreted the law as requiring states to have a faith-healing exemption to qualify for the grants — an interpretation that records from the time don’t explain. asserted
records → interpret → time
Most states went along, and Idaho further broadened its exemption in 1976 to not only keep faith healers from going to jail if their children died, but also to keep their children from being placed in foster care solely for lack of medical care. asserted
children → go → care
At the national level, the mandate lasted less than a decade. asserted
mandate → last → decade
…and 4 more, not listed.
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support