Why I Stopped Fighting AI in My Classroom and Started Teaching With It

Read the original at TIME ↗
Cite

Corso, J. (2026, August 26). Why I Stopped Fighting AI in My Classroom and Started Teaching With It. TIME. https://time.com/article/2026/08/26/why-i-stopped-fighting-ai-in-my-classroom-and-started-teaching-with-it/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

TIME · collected 2026-08-26 · by Jason Corso

Quick Summary

An engineering professor at the University of Michigan discusses how they've adapted their teaching methods to improve student engagement and retention in the wake of declining lecture attendance during the pandemic. The professor reports that by flipping their classroom, using AI-enabled tools to track student activity, and incorporating live discussions and debates, they've seen a significant increase in attendance and participation. The key number mentioned is 33%, which represents the proportion of class time devoted to traditional lecturing after implementing this new approach. The article presents a personal account of how the professor has shifted their teaching methods to focus on active learning and student interaction rather than simply conveying information.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-08-26, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Jason Corso, an engineering professor at the University of Michigan, noticed that students were relying heavily on AI tools like large language models (LLM) to complete their work. However, he believed this was not the most effective way for students to learn and master a subject. To combat this trend, Corso shifted his teaching approach from traditional lectures to more interactive and spontaneous human interactions, using AI as a tool to support active learning rather than doing the work himself. This change led to a significant increase in student attendance, even during the pandemic when online classes were held. According to an anonymous survey by Perusall, a tool used by some of Corso's students, it was estimated that over 80% of their peers were using AI tools for nearly all their work, but Corso argues that this approach is not effective in creating true experts who can use their knowledge to excel.

Written for “Teachers Embracing AI Technology” on 2026-10-16, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Teachers Embracing AI Technology
Education · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
42
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 42 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
60/100
TIME's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Education
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-08-26 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

TIME · 609 article(s) · 1 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 1 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jason Corso
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The future job market will not be dominated by autonomous AI, but by experts who have mastered their field so thoroughly that they can use it to multiply their output exponentially.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

LLM Perusall the University of Michigan

Subjects

LLM ORG · 1× the University of Michigan ORG · 1×

Narrative

By shifting the focus to high-stakes, spontaneous human interaction and leveraging AI for active learning rather than trusting it to do the work, educators can ensure that the knowledge lives within the student, not just the model.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-08-26
🔮 The future job market will not be dominated by autonomous AI, but by experts who have mastered their field so thoroughly that they can use it to multiply their output exponentially.

Claims (42 extracted, 0 hedged)

At a recent academic retreat I attended, the air was thick with what I can only call educational gaslighting. asserted
I → attend → what
A panel of graduate and undergraduate students looked a room full of professors in the eye and claimed they only used AI to verify their work because they valued learning too much to take shortcuts. asserted
they → look → shortcuts
Minutes later, when the answers were blind, those same students estimated that over 80% of their peers were using the technology for nearly everything. asserted
% → estimate → everything
As an engineering professor at the University of Michigan, I believe we need to move past the fear and hype. asserted
we → believe → fear
The future job market will not be dominated by autonomous AI, but by experts who have mastered their field so thoroughly that they can use it to multiply their output exponentially. asserted
they → dominate → output
But how do we help students become experts if they don’t show up? asserted
they → help → ?
This question precedes the LLM onslaught. asserted
question → precede → onslaught
Since the pandemic, traditional lecture attendance has cratered, but active learning has been shown to significantly improve both turnout and long-term retention. asserted
learning → cratere → turnout
By evolving my courses to embrace this data, I’ve seen attendance surge, even in the freeze of a Michigan winter. asserted
attendance → evolve → winter
Flipping the lecture cycle Classically, engineering courses default to hours of lectures where students are expected to take notes, with problem sets and exams bolted on. asserted
students → flip → sets
Many students treat a lecture as passive entertainment. asserted
students → treat → entertainment
And, often, the material is so technical that it is disconnected from real-world use, leading to even less engagement and retention. asserted
it → disconnect → engagement
To break this cycle, I’ve flipped my classroom. asserted
I → break → classroom
Each week, I assign a 2-hour recorded video lecture, along with a related article. asserted
I → assign → article
The assignments are made in Perusall, an AI-enabled tool that treats the video and article a bit like a social network. asserted
that → make → network
Students are graded based on their active engagement with the material, such as how much of the lecture they view, what questions and comments they leave in the system, and so on. asserted
they → grade → system
I can monitor which students leave comments, answer peer questions, and engage with the material before they ever set foot in my classroom. asserted
they → monitor → classroom
And if they try to cut and paste comments in multiple locations, the system flags them. asserted
system → try → them
It does not yet flag comments that seem AI-generated, but I expect that will be coming soon. asserted
that → flag → comments
With everyone primed to dig in, only one-third of my students’ time with me is devoted to classic lecturing. asserted
third → prim → lecturing
I offer a one-hour live lecture and invite industry guests to share stories of computer vision in the wild. asserted
I → offer → wild
Then my students spend the rest of our in-person time participating in small breakout sessions, a large group discussion, and an in-person quiz. asserted
students → spend → person
Not only do they grade their own quizzes, but they only get credit for an answer if one of them argues the logic behind it. asserted
one → grade → it
My students show up to class because the value is no longer in the information I provide—it's in the friction and growth of live exchange. asserted
it → show → exchange
This fall, I’m taking this a step further. asserted
I → take → this
We won’t just read technical papers; we will debate them. asserted
we → read → them
Anyone can be called to the front of the room to spontaneously argue one side of a research argument, which means every student must come prepared. asserted
student → call → argument
By moving the passive learning to the home and continuously pushing students to test their knowledge, I’ve reclaimed the classroom to create what AI cannot replicate: spontaneous, high-stakes human interaction. asserted
AI → move → interaction
Using AI as a supercharged tutor As we try to understand how AI can help and hinder learning, the most dangerous misconception is that it is a labor-saving device for the mind. asserted
it → use → mind
In reality, AI is an expertise-amplifier that can turn weeks of manual programming into a few hours of focused work. asserted
that → turn → work
But for a novice, relying on AI before mastering the fundamentals creates a technical debt that leads to a lack of depth. asserted
that → rely → depth
As someone at the forefront of AI research and creation, I don’t coach my students to avoid it, but rather I use it as a sophisticated, one-on-one tutor that facilitates active learning and helps them grow their expertise. asserted
them → coach → expertise
This means moving beyond passive consumption and toward a rigorous, iterative process of trial, error, and refinement. asserted
This → mean → trial
Some best practices I share with my students include: Mastery-First Workflow: Solve problems manually first. asserted
I → share → problems
Then use AI to check your work and identify where your logic diverges from the model. asserted
logic → use → model
One of the most effective ways to learn is through constant testing. asserted
One → learn → testing
After the AI helps organize your expertise, personally refine it through meticulous review or even rewrite, if necessary. asserted
AI → help → review
Redefining the honor code in the age of AI I am not an AI police officer. asserted
I → redefine → AI
I cannot—and should not—spend my academic career hunting for digital shortcuts in my students’ work. asserted
I → spend → work
I can only set the boundaries and allow them to choose how they show up. asserted
they → set → boundaries
…and 2 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support