Judge Loren AliKhan has denied a preliminary injunction request from an intersex plaintiff, Ms. Jansen, in a case related to the Trump administration's Executive Order requiring government-issued identification documents to reflect an individual's sex assigned at birth. The plaintiff, who was born with sex chromosome mosaicism and identifies as female, had argued that she would suffer irreparable harm if required to have a male sex designation on her new Global Entry card. However, the court found that Ms. Jansen currently possesses a valid passport that does not expire until 2032, and therefore is not at an imminent risk of experiencing harm. The case highlights the administration's policy requiring identification documents to reflect birth sex, which has been challenged by intersex individuals who do not identify with their assigned sex at birth.
Written by the local model on 2026-08-25,
using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the
same event (that is the story summary below).
On the first day of his second term, President Donald J. Trump issued an Executive Order declaring it "the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female," which "are not changeable."
asserted
which → issue → sexes
The Executive Order requires that government-issued identification documents, including passports and Global Entry cards, "accurately reflect the holder's sex" based on the individual's reproductive system "at conception."
asserted
documents → require → conception
Pursuant to the Executive Order, the U.S. Department of State and U.S. Customs and Border Protection ("CBP"), a component of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security ("DHS"), now require that sex markers on passports and Global Entry cards reflect an individual's sex assigned at birth.
asserted
markers → require → birth
She was born with sex chromosome mosaicism, an intersex condition where each of her cells has a different combination of sex chromosomes, such as XX, XY, and XXXY.
asserted
each → bear → XX
When Ms. Jansen was born, her sex was assigned as male on her birth certificate even though she was born with underdeveloped external male reproductive organs and testes that do not produce sperm.
asserted
that → bear → sperm
Ms. Jansen learned that she had mosaicism as a teenager, after which she "began living all aspects of her life as a woman."
asserted
she → learn → woman
In the 1990s, Ms. Jansen successfully petitioned to change the sex on her birth certificate and in her Social Security records to female.
asserted
Jansen → petition → female
Her state of residence also changed the sex designation on her driver's license from male to female "in the belief that the male designation was a clerical error."
asserted
designation → change → belief
Also in the 1990s, Ms. Jansen underwent surgery in the United Kingdom to align her physical anatomy with her female sex.
asserted
Jansen → undergo → sex
Ms. Jansen has lived as a woman for over thirty years, and while people close to her are aware that she is intersex and transgender, "people in her community are not."
asserted
people → live → community
The court concludes that Ms. Jansen has not carried her burden of showing irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, which is sufficient to deny her motion for a preliminary injunction….
asserted
which → conclude → injunction
[T]he parties agree that Ms. Jansen currently possesses a valid passport that bears a sex marker consistent with her lived sex, which does not expire until 2032.
asserted
which → agree → 2032
Because the State Department's policy provides that all passports will remain valid until their expiration date, Ms. Jansen is not at an imminent risk of experiencing the harms stemming from carrying a passport with a male sex marker….
asserted
Jansen → provide → marker
In contrast, Ms. Jansen's Global Entry card is currently eligible for renewal and will expire in November 2026.
asserted
card → expire → November
Ms. Jansen alleges that she has not sought renewal out of fear that she will be required to have a male sex designation on her new card….
asserted
she → allege → card
Ms. Jansen does not dispute that her Global Entry card is a "benefit" and that "she need only carry the card for certain participation purposes," but she argues that the government's discriminatory denial of this benefit "puts [her] to a Hobson's choice: suffer the indignity of losing access to this benefit because she refused to be labeled as something she is not, or the indignity of being outed and branded as male."
asserted
she → dispute → male
While the court agrees with Ms. Jansen that the government "cannot deny a benefit on a discriminatory basis," Ms. Jansen has not shown that she is likely to face imminent and irreparable harm from no longer using her Global Entry card.
asserted
she → agree → card
As an initial matter, a Global Entry card is not required to enter the United States; instead, membership in the program allows for expedited processing at airports, land borders, and seaports.
asserted
membership → require → airports
Ms. Jansen has not alleged that she has any plans to travel internationally.
asserted
she → allege → plans
And even if Ms. Jansen had alleged such plans, all she would lose is the ability to receive expedited processing.
asserted
she → allege → processing
That alleged injury does not meet the high standard for irreparable injury….
asserted
injury → allege → injury
{[B]ecause [the court] concludes that Ms. Jansen has failed to show irreparable harm warranting relief, it need not consider the remaining factors for a preliminary injunction—in particular, Ms. Jansen's likelihood of success on the merits.
asserted
it → conclude → merits
The court believes this approach to be prudent because, in addressing the likelihood of success on the merits in their briefs and at the hearing, the parties vigorously debated the application of the Supreme Court's order staying a class-wide preliminary injunction of the Passport Policy in Trump v. Orr (2025).
asserted
parties → believe → Orr
In Orr, the Supreme Court concluded that—on the limited record before it—the plaintiffs, who were transgender, were unlikely to succeed on the merits of their claims that displaying their sex at birth on their passports violated "equal protection principles" or was arbitrary and capricious, and that the government would "'suffer[] a form of irreparable injury' absent a stay."
uncertain
government → conclude → stay
The Supreme Court has explained that its "interim orders are not conclusive as to the merits" but instead should "inform how a court should exercise equitable discretion in like cases."
asserted
court → explain → cases
Ms. Jansen argues that Orr is distinguishable because it does not involve intersex plaintiffs like herself.
asserted
it → argue → herself
The court is somewhat skeptical that Ms. Jansen's intersex identity sufficiently distinguishes her suit from Orr to escape the Supreme Court's conclusion that "[d]isplaying passport holders' sex at birth … merely attest[s] to a historical fact without subjecting anyone to differential treatment."
asserted
d]isplaying → distinguish → treatment
Like the plaintiffs in Orr, Ms. Jansen wishes to maintain identification documents bearing a female sex marker consistent with her lived sex and appearance; she does not argue that her identification documents should bear a third sex marker for non-binary and intersex people (like "X" under the former State Department policy).
asserted
documents → wish → policy
Ms. Jansen thus appears to challenge the same policy addressed in Orr of requiring sex markers to correspond with one's sex assigned at birth.
asserted
Jansen → appear → birth
But the court need not resolve this issue at this preliminary stage of the litigation.
asserted
court → resolve → litigation
Johnny Hillary Walker, III represents the government.
asserted
Walker → represent → government