Why More Medical Testing Doesn’t Always Make Us Healthier

Read the original at TIME ↗
Cite

Davenport, D. M. S. (2026, August 24). Why More Medical Testing Doesn’t Always Make Us Healthier. TIME. https://time.com/article/2026/08/23/why-more-medical-testing-does-not-always-make-us-healthier/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

TIME · collected 2026-08-24 · by Dr. Matthew S. Davenport

Quick Summary

The article, written from the perspective of a radiologist, explores the relationship between medical testing and health outcomes. The key point made by the author is that more medical testing doesn't always lead to better health, as tests must accurately predict or diagnose conditions and result in beneficial changes in behavior. According to the author, many medical professionals initially believed that early diagnosis would always improve health, but research has shown that this is not always the case, with some diagnostic tests leading to unnecessary treatment and harm to patients. The article cites examples of small thyroid masses and kidney masses, where aggressive treatment did not help most people.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-08-24, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Dr. Matthew S. Davenport, a radiologist, argues that having access to large amounts of health data through tests like MRIs, CT scans, and ultrasounds does not necessarily make people healthier. In order for medical testing to improve someone's health, the test must accurately diagnose or predict a condition, lead to a change in behavior, and ultimately result in better health outcomes than not having the test. For example, whole-body MRIs of the general public can provide accurate information about some diseases, but not others, and may not lead to better health outcomes due to the lack of medical guidelines or payer recommendations for this type of testing.

Written for “Medical Overtesting Risks” on 2026-10-17, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Medical Overtesting Risks
Health · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
35
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
11%
4 of 35 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
60/100
TIME's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Health
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-08-24 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

TIME · 615 article(s) · 1 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 1 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Dr. Matthew S. Davenport
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 All on your own, you can get an MRI of your entire body, a CT of your coronary calcium, an ultrasound of your blood vessels, and maybe someday an immersion ultrasound in a spa.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

No topics tagged.

Subjects

No subjects extracted.

Narrative

In order to make a difference in someone’s health, the test must accurately predict or diagnose a condition, resulting in a change in mindset and behavior, and that change in mindset and behavior must produce a better outcome than not doing the test.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-08-24
🔮 All on your own, you can get an MRI of your entire body, a CT of your coronary calcium, an ultrasound of your blood vessels, and maybe someday an immersion ultrasound in a spa.
2026-08-24 · TIME
Why More Medical Testing Doesn’t Always Make Us Healthier · assertive framing

Claims (35 extracted, 4 hedged)

Today, if you wish, you can go get a staggering amount of granular data about your health without your doctor’s involvement. asserted
you → wish → involvement
All on your own, you can get an MRI of your entire body, a CT of your coronary calcium, an ultrasound of your blood vessels, and maybe someday an immersion ultrasound in a spa. asserted
you → get → spa
As a radiologist, a doctor specialized in the alchemy of turning information into health, I translate data hidden in images into words that motivate behavior to promote healthier, longer lives. asserted
that → specialize → lives
, radiologists have grappled for decades with the question of whether and how information improves health. asserted
information → grapple → health
It turns out to be surprisingly complicated. asserted
It → turn → ?
In order to make a difference in someone’s health, the test must accurately predict or diagnose a condition, resulting in a change in mindset and behavior, and that change in mindset and behavior must produce a better outcome than not doing the test. asserted
change → make → test
For example, whole-body MRI of the general public, a test not recommended by any medical guideline, medical society, or payer, creates information by taking a picture of your body. asserted
MRI → recommend → body
It might change your mind by finding something you didn’t know about, like a small mass in your kidney or thyroid gland, which then might change what you or your doctor does. uncertain
you → change → what
For example, your doctor might order another test to better understand if the mass is important or perform surgery to take it out. uncertain
mass → order → it
This seems logical. asserted
This → seem → ?
But the reason whole-body MRI of the general public isn’t recommended while other screening tests are is because in the absence of evidence, it is believed to be unlikely to produce a better outcome than doing nothing at all. asserted
it → recommend → nothing
Many people think, as I once did, that early diagnosis always improves health. asserted
diagnosis → think → health
Finding something with a diagnostic test might not help, despite creating an illusion that it does. uncertain
it → find → illusion
For both examples I gave—small thyroid masses, small kidney masses—it has been well documented that aggressive efforts to treat them, despite many being cancer, does not help most people. asserted
many → give → people
Yet despite ourselves, we keep finding and removing them. asserted
we → find → them
That’s the tricky thing with diagnostic tests. asserted
That → ’ → tests
It’s terrifically hard to unsee something. asserted
It → ’ → something
For those who receive no benefit from treatment, only secondary harm results: surgical pain and complications, the anxiety of a scary diagnosis, and financial burden. asserted
harm → receive → diagnosis
There are numerous non-intuitive examples like this in which only in retrospect do we realize patients have been harmed because a diagnostic test and its downstream actions were promoted to millions before confirming things worked as intended. asserted
things → be → millions
It’s really hard to know if something is hurting or helping if we rely on common sense. asserted
we → ’ → sense
The likelihood of benefit and the likelihood of harm matter tremendously. asserted
likelihood → matter → harm
For example, if whole-body MRI is performed on a high-risk patient with a cancer-causing genetic syndrome, it is much more likely to create health benefits than if it were to be performed in the general population. asserted
it → perform → population
It’s not just about test accuracy. asserted
It → ’ → accuracy
Equally important is the people being tested, because baseline risk strongly influences the benefits. asserted
risk → test → benefits
Harm is often caused not by the test itself, but from actions taken to manage the information of unknown significance it produces. asserted
it → cause → significance
It is in this way that a seemingly harmless test can hurt people. asserted
test → hurt → people
We do tests to find things, and when we find things, we commonly act, even when we shouldn’t, because we aren’t rational decision-makers. asserted
we → do → things
Direct-to-consumer testing will change how medicine is practiced. asserted
medicine → change → consumer
It empowers us to make personal decisions about our health and generates novel, complex information that will unlock scientific breakthroughs. asserted
that → empower → breakthroughs
When buying one of these tests, we should pay attention to what the company is claiming. asserted
company → buy → what
The need for scientific support, informed disclosure, and regulatory compliance increases as the test moves from curiosity toward clinical care. asserted
test → increase → care
If the test has only been shown to provide information or to make a diagnosis, or has only been shown to improve health in patients with specific risk factors different from our own, we should be skeptical. asserted
we → show → own
As they say, buyer beware. asserted
buyer → say → ?
Many companies encourage us to assume their test improves our health. asserted
test → encourage → health
In such cases, the information we are buying may help us, hurt us, or be a placebo and do nothing at all. uncertain
we → buy → nothing
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support