The Eras of Francis Fukuyama: How States Form

Read the original at Persuasion ↗
Cite

Mounk, Y. (2026, August 24). The Eras of Francis Fukuyama: How States Form. Persuasion. https://www.persuasion.community/p/the-eras-of-francis-fukuyama-4

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Persuasion · collected 2026-08-24 · by Yascha Mounk commentary

Quick Summary

Francis Fukuyama, a senior fellow at Stanford University and author of "In the Realm of the Last Man", discusses his shift in opinion on the Iraq War with Yascha Mounk. Initially supporting the war, Fukuyama changed his mind due to his experiences with the neoconservative movement's hubristic foreign policy assumptions. The conversation, part of a series on Liberal Virtues and Values supported by the John Templeton Foundation, explores how Fukuyama's views on human nature and international intervention evolved over 15-20 years.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-08-24, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

The John Templeton Foundation has funded a series of articles on Liberal Virtues and Values, published in the online magazine Persuasion. Three articles related to this series have been published, including pieces by Yascha Mounk, Teresa M. Bejan, and Francis Fukuyama.

Yascha Mounk interviewed Francis Fukuyama about his life and thought at The Abbey Centre in London on September 6th, with the event promoted through Persuasion and American Purpose. In this conversation, Fukuyama discussed how he initially supported the Iraq War and what changed his mind, as well as the neoconservative movement's experience of Eastern Europe shaping its disastrous assumptions about the Middle East.

In a separate article, Teresa M. Bejan argued that John Locke had an unfamiliar vision of "Lockean" toleration, one focused on accommodating some dissent from public orthodoxy while promoting a more reasonable and tolerant approach to religion supported by the state. This perspective was inspired by Locke's 1667 manuscript memorandum.

Meanwhile, Francis Fukuyama wrote about how President Trump has tried to expand executive authority in the U.S., with potentially far-reaching impacts on governance in America.

Written for “Philosophy on State Power” on 2026-10-16, grounded in this article and the 2 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Philosophy on State Power
Politics · 3 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 5% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
What Locke Knew About Elites same event · 100%
Persuasion
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 14% hedged 11 of 81
“Both articles mention an upcoming interview between Yascha Mounk and Francis Fukuyama at The Abbey Centre in London, with identical details including date, time, and location.”
On Executive Authority different event · 90%
Persuasion
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 3
“The events are two separate interviews of Francis Fukuyama, one about his views on executive authority and another about his life and thought”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
288
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
5%
13 of 288 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
expected in commentary, which argues a position · beta estimate
Publisher signals
not measured
these signals count newsroom corrections; Commentary has none to count
Outlets on this story
3
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-08-24 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Persuasion · 77 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Yascha Mounk
14 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Might they even win the Senate?
2026-10-03 · assertive framing · Galen Druke on the Midterms
🔮 Then this guy put up his hand and said, Professor Furedi, are you saying that democracy is good in and of itself, and you would even respect democracy if it went against your views?
2026-09-29 · assertive framing · Frank Furedi on the Case for Populism
🔮 Once they did that, you were entering into a game in which there was a struggle for supremacy and over who would create their version of the state.
🔮 A series of elections held today are unlikely to receive the same attention but may be even more revelatory about Germany’s dire state.
2026-09-21 · assertive framing · The Last Nail in the Coffin for Friedrich Merz
🔮 In fact, you’ve argued at times that we may already have reached something like artificial general intelligence.
2026-09-19 · assertive framing · Jerry Kaplan on Why AI Won’t Kill Us All
🔮 In this week’s conversation, Yascha Mounk and Jacob Weisberg discuss why American institutions proved far less resistant to Trump in his second term than his first, what figures like Jeff Bezos and Brad Karp reveal about the social nature of courage and cowardice, and whether Harvard’s response to the Trump administration could become a turning point for institutional resistance.
2026-09-15 · assertive framing · Jacob Weisberg on the Contagion of Cowardice
🔮 There’s a kind of melancholy, I think, that people feel for the good old days, for a world that was maybe slower, where the worth that they had relative to their environment was a little bit clearer than in the world today.
2026-09-12 · assertive framing · Judith Dada on the Rise of the AfD
🔮 If I had to give you a thesis, it would be that Donald Trump is a unique figure in our politics, that there aren’t a lot of other people like him, because of his relationship to America for decades and decades, not just as a television game show host, but as somebody who lived on Page Six, somebody who wrote The Art of the Deal, someone who’s been on all of these luminaries and talk shows.
2026-09-08 · assertive framing · Sarah Longwell on How Democrats Can Defeat Trump
🔮 In your book you suggest that it depends on a set of circumstances, such as how set the institutional environment is in which they operate and what the likely replacement would be like.
2026-09-05 · assertive framing · Jared Diamond on Whether Leaders Make History
🔮 We’re on vacation this week, so are rerunning a fun “beach read” episode exploring if your nearest and dearest could be psychopaths. Miss us already?
2026-08-31 · assertive framing · Abigail Marsh on Psychopaths (Rerun)
Also by Yascha Mounk
The Three-Party Problem
2026-10-05 · The Dispatch
Galen Druke on the Midterms
2026-10-03 · Persuasion
Frank Furedi on the Case for Populism
2026-09-29 · Persuasion
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 14 articles by Yascha Mounk →

Topics

London Persuasion Stanford University the Iraq War the John Templeton Foundation

Subjects

Francis Fukuyama PERSON · 4× Iraq GPE · 3× Yascha Mounk PERSON · 3× Bill Kristol PERSON · 2× Fukuyama PERSON · 2× Frankly Fukuyama PERSON · 1× London GPE · 1× Persuasion ORG · 1× Stanford University ORG · 1× the John Templeton Foundation ORG · 1×

Narrative

Obviously one other factor that was very important was the split between Sunnis and Shias, and the fact that even though Saddam Hussein was extremely unpopular among Shias and among many Sunnis—he was a terrible dictator, and that’s something we shouldn’t forget in retelling the story—the moment Sunnis felt like their power was being taken away and Shias were going to be in charge of the state, they had a very strong reason to try and organize against the new regime.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-08-24
🔮 In an event exclusively for readers of American Purpose and Persuasion, Yascha Mounk will be interviewing Francis Fukuyama about his life and thought at 5pm on Sunday, September 6 at The Abbey Centre, London.
2026-08-24 · Persuasion
The Eras of Francis Fukuyama: How States Form · assertive framing

Claims (288 extracted, 13 hedged)

In this week’s conversation, Yascha Mounk and Francis Fukuyama discuss why Fukuyama initially supported the Iraq War and what changed his mind, how the neoconservative movement’s experience of Eastern Europe shaped its disastrous assumptions about the Middle East, and what his break with former colleagues cost him personally and professionally. asserted
break → discuss → him
In an event exclusively for readers of American Purpose and Persuasion, Yascha Mounk will be interviewing Francis Fukuyama about his life and thought at 5pm on Sunday, September 6 at The Abbey Centre, London. asserted
Mounk → interview → Centre
Paying subscribers of Persuasion and American Purpose can access a code for a free ticket here. asserted
subscribers → pay → ticket
We’re delighted to feature this conversation as part of our series on Liberal Virtues and Values. asserted
We → feature → Virtues
This series, made possible with the generous support of the John Templeton Foundation, features content making the case that liberalism has its own distinctive set of virtues and values that are capable not only of responding to the dissatisfaction that drives authoritarianism, but also of restoring faith in liberalism as an ideology worth believing in—and defending—on its own terms. asserted
that → make → terms
This transcript has been condensed and lightly edited for clarity. asserted
transcript → condense → clarity
We left in the 1990s, or I suppose the early 2000s, with your writing about human nature. asserted
I → leave → nature
So I think we’re going to try and cover the next fifteen or twenty years in this conversation. asserted
we → think → conversation
The starting point to a lot of political debate, and perhaps to some big changes in your reflections about the world, was the terrible terrorist attacks of September 11th and the decision by the administration of George W. Bush to invade Iraq. asserted
point → invade → Iraq
You initially supported that idea and then changed your mind about it. asserted
You → support → it
Well, I had fallen in with a group of people that later became known as the neoconservatives—people like Bill Kristol and his Project for the New American Century, which started in the 1990s. asserted
which → fall → 1990s
I frankly hadn’t been thinking about foreign policy all that much in the 1990s. asserted
I → think → 1990s
I was more interested in things like the wars in Central America, or the peacekeeping missions that had been undertaken in that period. asserted
that → undertake → period
It’s so long ago—we had this thing called the responsibility to protect, at a time when the West seemed so overpoweringly powerful and influential. asserted
West → ’ → time
And the question was: when were we going to intervene to restore order to disorderly developing countries? asserted
we → go → countries
That now seems incredibly hubristic. asserted
That → seem → ?
I remember being quite skeptical about that idea when I first came across it as a young student. asserted
I → remember → student
But of course, this came out of the failure to intervene in Rwanda—the sense that we had let these horrible genocides go on without doing anything. asserted
genocides → come → anything
And so, if we had the power, if we had the ability, why shouldn’t we go in and save people from genocide? asserted
we → have → genocide
And we have the ability to do that—well, why shouldn’t we take it one step further and spread the joys of democracy and good government around the world? asserted
we → have → world
You have to give it its due—you have to place it in the historical context of where that instinct came from. asserted
instinct → have → where
I had been thinking about developing world conflicts, civil wars, intervention, and I hadn’t paid that much attention to this ongoing crisis over Iraq—even though when I was an intern at the RAND Corporation back in 1978, that’s what I did. asserted
I → think → what
I wrote a whole study that summer about Iraq’s—Saddam Hussein’s—relationship to the Soviet Union, which at that time was the most radical Arab rejectionist country. asserted
which → write → time
So I did sign on to a letter that Bill Kristol had sent around urging intervention in Iraq. asserted
Kristol → sign → Iraq
To my embarrassment, I actually hadn’t thought that carefully about it. asserted
I → think → it
Then September 11th happened. asserted
11th → happen → ?
I was sitting in my office at SAIS on Massachusetts Avenue when the Pentagon was struck. asserted
Pentagon → sit → Avenue
One of my colleagues came into my office and said, “You’d better turn on the TV, because something big is happening.” asserted
something → come → TV
And we watched the second plane go into the second tower, and looking out the windows we could actually see the smoke rising from the Pentagon, which had also been hit that morning. uncertain
which → watch → Pentagon
Everything seemed to change. asserted
Everything → seem → ?
And the question then was: what do we do about this? asserted
we → do → this
This led to this really bitter and prolonged debate over the causes of September 11th, and the inclination of a lot of my conservative friends to try to link this to Saddam Hussein and this longstanding problem that they’d had with Iraq and its attempt to develop weapons of mass destruction. asserted
they → lead → destruction
I don’t know that it’s worth going through all of the ins and outs of that latter issue. asserted
it → know → issue
The elder Bush had intervened to get Iraq out of Kuwait back in 1991. asserted
Iraq → intervene → 1991
In the subsequent years, they discovered that Iraq was actually working on a nuclear program. asserted
Iraq → discover → program
They sent nuclear inspectors in, and Saddam Hussein kicked them out. asserted
Hussein → send → them
And it did look like he was trying to do his best to deceive the outside world as to the existence of these WMD programs. asserted
he → look → programs
But after September 11th, there was an attempt to link all of this to the September 11th attacks, and that laid the ground for the disastrous intervention in 2003. asserted
that → be → 2003
So that was the general background out of which I was operating back then. asserted
I → operate → which
So at the time when you favored this intervention, which of the different kinds of justifications for the war did you find to be most compelling? asserted
you → favor → war
…and 248 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support