His Research on Pregnant Opioid Users Was Widely Celebrated. Auditors and Experts Found Major Flaws.

ProPublica · collected 2026-08-24 · by Amy Yurkanin
Read the original at ProPublica ↗

Summary

A University of Tennessee audit has found major flaws in the research on pregnant opioid users conducted by Dr. Craig Towers, who had previously been widely celebrated for his unconventional treatment approach. The audit was triggered after eight addiction and pregnancy specialists raised concerns about Towers' research in a letter to his employer. According to the audit, numerous problems were discovered with the study, which involved over 300 participants, including issues with data collection and methodology. Despite Towers' retirement citing health and family reasons, some clinics continue to use approaches based on his research.
Written by the local model on 2026-08-25, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
144
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
10%
14 of 144 hedged
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher trust
95.4
red-flag proxy, not a credibility rating
Outlets on this story
1
Health
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-08-25 · source text last changed 2026-08-25 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

Dr. Craig Towers, a high-risk obstetrician, moved to Knoxville, Tennessee in 2010 and found himself caring for many pregnant women addicted to opioids. He published a study on an unconventional treatment that claimed promising results, but eight addiction and pregnancy specialists raised concerns about the research in a letter to his employer, the University of Tennessee. An audit of the study revealed numerous problems, including the fact that Towers' research only reported minor health problems among the mothers during their pregnancies, contradicting medical doctrine that withdrawal could harm the fetus. The study's findings are still being used by some clinics, despite Towers' retirement citing health and family reasons.

Written for “Flawed Opioid Addiction Study Research” on 2026-08-31, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it +0.35, but every quote it verified points left, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 1926: score contradicts its own evidence · logged 2026-08-28

Story

📰 Flawed Opioid Addiction Study Research
Health · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.

Publisher

ProPublica · 16 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
SignalValueWeight
Correction rate 0.000 0.4
Uncertainty density 0.091 0.25
Assertive mismatch rate 0.000 0.35
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Amy Yurkanin
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Medical doctrine had long held that a pregnant patient with an opioid addiction could not be safely detoxed because withdrawal could harm the fetus, causing physical stress and even triggering miscarriage.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

California Knoxville Tennessee Wisconsin the University of Tennessee

Subjects

Towers PERSON · 10× Tennessee GPE · 3× Craig Towers PERSON · 2× the University of Tennessee ORG · 2× California GPE · 1× Johnson City GPE · 1× Knoxville GPE · 1× Wisconsin GPE · 1× the Knoxville News Sentinel ORG · 1× the University of Tennessee Medical Center’s ORG · 1×

Narrative

University of North Carolina researcher Hendrée Jones, one of the specialists who drafted and signed the letter, told ProPublica that she was surprised by another aspect of Towers’ study: that it included reports of only minor health problems among the mothers, including nausea and headache, during the course of their’ pregnancies.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-08-24
🔮 Medical doctrine had long held that a pregnant patient with an opioid addiction could not be safely detoxed because withdrawal could harm the fetus, causing physical stress and even triggering miscarriage.

Claims (144 extracted, 14 hedged)

Dr. Craig Towers said he was “inundated” with pregnant patients addicted to opioids. asserted
he → say → opioids
He published a study with promising results from an unconventional treatment. asserted
He → publish → treatment
Eight addiction and pregnancy specialists raised concerns about Towers’ research in a letter to his employer, the University of Tennessee. asserted
specialists → raise → Tennessee
A university audit of the study found numerous problems. asserted
audit → find → problems
Towers retired, citing health and family reasons, but some clinics still use approaches described in his research. asserted
clinics → retire → research
These highlights were written by the reporters and editors who worked on this story. asserted
who → write → story
When Dr. Craig Towers moved to Knoxville, Tennessee, in 2010, the high-risk obstetrician encountered a crisis unlike anything he’d seen. asserted
he → move → anything
Towers, who had practiced for 25 years in California and Wisconsin, found himself caring for an unusual number of pregnant women addicted to painkillers — and delivering newborns who were suffering withdrawal symptoms. asserted
who → practice → symptoms
Those babies, born shaking and inconsolable and who required weeks of specialized care, were becoming tragic symbols of the region’s raging opioid epidemic. asserted
who → bear → epidemic
“We were inundated,” Towers later told the Knoxville News Sentinel. asserted
Towers → inundate → Sentinel
In those initial years in Tennessee, Towers recognized a need — and a research opportunity. asserted
Towers → recognize → need
Medical doctrine had long held that a pregnant patient with an opioid addiction could not be safely detoxed because withdrawal could harm the fetus, causing physical stress and even triggering miscarriage. uncertain
withdrawal → hold → miscarriage
Instead, doctors treated patients with methadone or buprenorphine, which are legal replacement opiates that control cravings and have a lower risk of overdose. asserted
that → treat → overdose
Those drugs can still cause babies to be born in withdrawal, but doctors reasoned that it was better to treat the newborn for those symptoms than risk the baby’s death. asserted
it → cause → death
Towers, who was hired to work at the University of Tennessee Medical Center’s clinic for high-risk pregnancies and later joined the medical school faculty, questioned that approach. asserted
who → hire → approach
He began studying the outcomes of women, most of them his patients, who stopped taking those medications. asserted
who → begin → medications
He ultimately collected data on more than 300 of them. asserted
He → collect → them
Towers’ research found that detoxing was much less harmful to the fetus than feared, and it prompted changes to how doctors treat pregnant opioid users. asserted
doctors → find → users
Across Tennessee — in Johnson City, Jellico and Sevierville — and in Daytona Beach, Florida, clinics followed his lead. asserted
clinics → follow → lead
The News Sentinel honored him as a “Health Care Hero.” asserted
Sentinel → honor → Hero
CNN’s chief medical correspondent, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, interviewed him about his work and described babies born without withdrawal symptoms as “miracles.” asserted
correspondent → interview → miracles
In 2019, the medical school granted a request for additional funding for Towers’ work, praising “his many research efforts and leadership that has resulted in national recognition.” asserted
that → grant → recognition
In the months before he published what would be a groundbreaking study, he described his findings at a university science forum, saying: “I think it’s going to revolutionize what we do.” asserted
we → publish → what
And then in 2020, soon after the study was published, Towers abruptly stepped back from his research. asserted
Towers → publish → research
The study immediately caught the attention of specialists in addiction treatment. asserted
study → catch → treatment
Some of them wondered how the results could be true. uncertain
results → wonder → them
The study, the largest of its kind, enlisted 230 participants, 121 of whom took a daily dose of a drug called naltrexone, which, unlike methadone or buprenorphine, is not an opioid; instead it discourages using by blocking the high. asserted
it → enlist → high
Naltrexone was effective in keeping most patients off of opiates, the study found. asserted
study → keep → opiates
But in many other major studies, naltrexone had shown lackluster results. asserted
naltrexone → show → results
Rates of relapse among nonpregnant patients averaged 72%, according to a systematic review of 13 studies. uncertain
Rates → average → studies
Eight specialists in the fields of addiction and pregnancy started sharing concerns with one another about Towers’ study and then drafted a letter to the University of Tennessee. asserted
specialists → share → Tennessee
Two of them agreed to speak with ProPublica (the others asked not to be identified). asserted
others → agree → ProPublica
One was Dr. Mishka Terplan, a practicing OB-GYN board-certified in addiction medicine who’d served on several committees to develop federal and professional guidelines for treating opioid use during pregnancy. asserted
who → practice → pregnancy
“Dr Towers’ work has been impactful, especially in TN,” Terplan wrote to the university in July 2020, “and I am concerned that each day the article(s) is out there, potential harm to a vulnerable population accumulates through both ethically suspect clinical care and consequently misguided public health. asserted
harm → write → care
By that time, a university audit had uncovered major problems with Towers’ research. asserted
audit → uncover → research
The audit found that Towers failed to get university approval for the study, that he provided “inaccurate and/or unverifiable, contradictory source documentation” for a component of the study and that he did not provide research databases or data analysis as requested. asserted
he → find → databases
Auditors also were unable to determine the extent to which he protected confidential patient health information. asserted
he → determine → information
For three years, the journal did nothing to publicly address those concerns. asserted
journal → do → concerns
When the journal did act, in 2023, it published a 78-word correction stating that the study had been improperly listed as a “prospective,” a rigorous type of research that follows patients in real time. asserted
that → act → time
ProPublica shared Towers’ study, the university’s audit and the journal’s correction with five experts on research ethics and substance abuse during pregnancy. asserted
ProPublica → share → pregnancy
…and 104 more, not listed.
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support