‘Putin has repeatedly threatened the UK and Nato over Ukraine – but he is too weak to follow through’

Read the original at The Independent ↗
Cite

Kidwai, S. (2026, August 21). ‘Putin has repeatedly threatened the UK and Nato over Ukraine – but he is too weak to follow through’. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/putin-uk-warning-russia-threat-ukraine-nato-b3036816.html

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Independent · collected 2026-08-21 · by Suha Kidwai

Quick Summary

Vladimir Putin has repeatedly threatened the UK and NATO over its involvement in Ukraine, but according to Katia Glod of the New Eurasia Strategies Centre, these threats are largely empty. The Kremlin's aggressive posturing is intended to deter Western support for Ukraine rather than a genuine threat of military action against Britain or other Nato members. Glod suggests that Putin is aware that direct strikes on the UK would be too risky and instead may opt for "hybrid attacks" such as cyber-crime, diplomatic harassment, and recruiting proxies on British soil. The UK has been supplying drones to Ukraine, which has sparked further threats from Moscow.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-08-21, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Russia has threatened to strike British military targets in response to UK support for Ukraine, with Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova saying that Russia could hit British targets inside and outside Ukraine. This warning comes after the UK announced it would allow Kyiv access to classified technology to start producing its own Storm Shadow long-range cruise missiles, capable of striking deep within Russia. The move has been strongly condemned by Russia, with President Vladimir Putin's spokesman Dmitry Peskov saying that it would "add fuel to the fire" of the conflict. The UK has supplied Ukraine with drones and is now providing classified information on British-made components used in long-range cruise missiles, which Russia views as a deepening of its involvement in the war.

In response, Russia has warned of unspecified consequences for supplying drones to Kyiv and accused Britain of "playing with fire" by supplying sensitive missile technology. The Kremlin has also dismissed US media reports that Russia could attack a NATO member state and said that CIA Director John Ratcliffe's visit to Moscow was aimed at easing tensions.

The situation is escalating, with tensions between the Kremlin and Downing Street continuing to rise. British Prime Minister Andy Burnham has been warned that Britain faces Russian retaliation over its support for Ukraine, with security experts telling him to be prepared for a "direct response" from Vladimir Putin. The UK has vowed to continue providing defense aid to Ukraine despite Russia's threats.

The conflict between Russia and Ukraine has reached a critical point, with Russia accusing the UK of taking a hostile stance on Ukraine. The Kremlin believes that Britain is actively involved in the war, while the UK sees its support for Ukraine as necessary to defend European freedom. As the situation continues to escalate, it remains unclear what steps will be taken next by either side.

Written for “Russia vs UK Over Ukraine Support” on 2026-10-16, grounded in this article and the 11 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Russia vs UK Over Ukraine Support
Politics · 12 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 4% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
National Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 11% hedged 1 of 9 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles report on reports of British-made drones striking deep inside Russian territory, and Russia's warning to Britain that it will pay a price”
CBS News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 11 📰 publisher trust 66
“Article A discusses Mykhailo Fedorov calling for elections in Ukraine despite war with Russia, while Article B mentions UK-Nato tensions and Putin's aggressive posturing regarding Ukraine without any direct connection to the event described in Article A”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 14% hedged 7 of 49 📰 publisher trust 59
“Although both articles mention British-made drones striking deep inside Russian territory and Putin's threats against the UK, they do not describe the exact same incident or outcome.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this 🔴 7% hedged 2 of 28 📰 publisher trust 64
“Both articles report on Russia's reaction to the UK supplying Ukraine with missile technology, specifically mentioning Andy Burnham's visit and the Kremlin's negative view”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this 🔴 11% hedged 1 of 9 📰 publisher trust 60
“Although both articles mention British support for Ukraine, Article B describes a new development (British Prime Minister's visit) while Article A is more general about threats made by Putin”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 43% hedged 6 of 14 📰 publisher trust 60
“Although both articles mention drone factories and threats from the Kremlin, Article A focuses on Russian territory being struck by British-made drones, while Article B discusses UK drone factories being potentially attacked”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 4% hedged 2 of 47 📰 publisher trust 59
“Article A discusses Putin's threats in general, while Article B reports on a specific request by the CIA director for Ukraine not to strike Moscow during his visit”
The Straits Times
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 11% hedged 1 of 9 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A reports on Russia's reaction to Britain supplying drones to Ukraine, while Article B discusses Putin's threats against UK and NATO in general, without mentioning a specific incident involving drones”
The Independent
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 37 📰 publisher trust 59
“Article A mentions general threats from Putin, while Article B reports a specific visit by Burnham and a related announcement, indicating different events”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this 🔴 12% hedged 5 of 42 📰 publisher trust 64
“Although both articles mention Vladimir Putin's threats towards the UK in response to its support for Ukraine, they do not describe the exact same incident or time frame. Article A mentions 'reports of British-made drones striking deep inside Russian territory' but does not specify a date, while Article B specifically mentions an event on Monday when Prime Minister Andy Burnham arrived in Kyiv and announced that MBDA had been given permission to share information on UK components for the Scalp missile.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
26
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
4%
1 of 26 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
59/100
The Independent's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
12
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-08-21 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Independent · 2463 article(s) · 5 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 5 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Suha Kidwai
19 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Since, Zelensky has publicly condemned the agreement as a “betrayal” that directly bankrolls Moscow’s war effort, and announced that Ukraine would resume striking Russian refineries.
🔮 I will do anything to help him.
🔮 I will do anything to help him.
🔮 Earlier, Iran’s influential parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said his country would keep the Strait of Hormuz closed until the conditions it laid out in an interim agreement in June are met, according to Nournews.
🔮 Meanwhile, Russia hit Kyiv’s North Bridge on Sunday, the capital’s mayor said.
🔮 Former Rospotrebnadzor head Gennady Onishchenko downplayed the threat in comments to state news agency TASS, stating that the infection in the Irkutsk region is "most likely not the plague, but even if confirmed, there will be no spread of this disease." He added that widespread transmission remains unlikely, noting that cooler seasonal temperatures would help contain potential spread.
🔮 “That will probably change now and crew members will be subject to heavier screening.
🔮 In Kyiv, Ukrainian officials have expressed firm limits on what concessions they would consider.
🔮 Witkoff said he had "heard new ideas" in Moscow and hoped a new round of US-mediated talks between Russia and Ukraine would be announced "in short order”.
🔮 This strategy, rooted in the post-Cold War doctrine of Ostpolitik, was built on the belief that mutual commercial dependence would guarantee stability and deter Putin from threatening Europe.
Also by Suha Kidwai
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 19 articles by Suha Kidwai →

Topics

Britain British Kremlin Nato Ukraine

Subjects

Putin PERSON · 8× Glod PERSON · 7× Russian NORP · 6× Britain GPE · 5× British NORP · 5× Kremlin ORG · 5× Nato ORG · 5× Russia GPE · 5× Ukraine GPE · 4× Moscow GPE · 3×

Narrative

Incidents like the 2006 assassination of former FSB officer Alexander Litvinenko via radioactive polonium-210, and the notorious Novichok poisoning of Sergei Skripal in Salisbury should be seen in that context, although they are extreme examples. More recent examples include the Leyton warehouse arson in March 2024 — where Russia was found to have recruited proxies to set fire to a Ukrainian-owned commercial facility — or the 2024 and 2025 reconnaissance by the Russian vessel Yantar, which was detected loitering near the UK’s critical underwater infrastructure. But while Russia is content meddling with British affairs from afar, the Kremlin remains highly aware that direct strikes on the UK would be “playing with fire,” says Glod, given the mutual defence agreement between allies in Nato.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-08-21
🔮 The Kremlin has often issued threats that Britain will “pay a higher price” for its role in Ukraine — as it did again this week following reports of British-made drones striking deep inside Russian territory — But Moscow’s sabre-rattling is rarely meant for Britain alone.

Claims (26 extracted, 1 hedged)

The Kremlin has often issued threats that Britain will “pay a higher price” for its role in Ukraine — as it did again this week following reports of British-made drones striking deep inside Russian territory — But Moscow’s sabre-rattling is rarely meant for Britain alone. asserted
rattling → issue → Britain
Here, Katia Glod, deputy head of foreign policy at the New Eurasia Strategies Centre (NEST) think tank, speaks to The Independent to break down the intended purpose of Vladimir Putin’s aggressive posturing. asserted
Glod → speak → posturing
History of UK-Russia tensions “Putin’s threats should be taken seriously — but not toward the possibility of a real, kinetic move against Britain” in terms of war, says Glod. asserted
Glod → take → war
Glod emphasises that such threats are not new for the UK, where for decades, Moscow has used Britain as a staging ground for actions to garner global attention, while being able to deny them as Kremlin-directed. asserted
Moscow → emphasise → them
Incidents like the 2006 assassination of former FSB officer Alexander Litvinenko via radioactive polonium-210, and the notorious Novichok poisoning of Sergei Skripal in Salisbury should be seen in that context, although they are extreme examples. More recent examples include the Leyton warehouse arson in March 2024 — where Russia was found to have recruited proxies to set fire to a Ukrainian-owned commercial facility — or the 2024 and 2025 reconnaissance by the Russian vessel Yantar, which was detected loitering near the UK’s critical underwater infrastructure. But while Russia is content meddling with British affairs from afar, the Kremlin remains highly aware that direct strikes on the UK would be “playing with fire,” says Glod, given the mutual defence agreement between allies in Nato. asserted
Glod → see → Nato
“No-one really knows what Nato’s response to a Russian attack on the UK would be, and Putin doesn’t want to find out. asserted
Putin → know → UK
He knows that Russia doesn’t have the capacity to respond.” asserted
Russia → know → capacity
Could Putin escalate his 'hybrid war' on Britain? uncertain
Putin → escalate → Britain
Instead, the threat posed by a potential NATO intervention means that the Kremlin will most likely look toward “hybrid attacks.” asserted
Kremlin → pose → attacks
Hybrid attacks often use non-military actions to harm a rival country without starting a traditional war. asserted
attacks → use → war
Such attacks include: cyber-crime, harassing diplomats, recruiting criminals on British soil to help achieve Russian objectives, or approaching British airspace and waters. asserted
attacks → include → airspace
“These things will all continue, or even escalate, but it is hard to say if it is solely because of the UK supplying drones to Ukraine, or if they would have happened anyways,” explains Glod. asserted
Glod → continue → Ukraine
Why Putin faces conflicting objectives For Putin, empty threats have created a problem. asserted
threats → face → problem
“His two main objectives are conflicting,” Glod stresses. asserted
Glod → stress → ?
“While he’s trying to signal that anyone who helps Ukraine will face retaliation, he also wants to avoid being directly affiliated with any kinetic action against a Nato member.” asserted
he → try → member
“What Putin really wants is for Western states to understand that assisting Ukraine will result in escalation. asserted
assisting → want → escalation
” But with Putin taking no direct action against Nato members over the past four years, Russian credibility to back up its threats is waning. asserted
credibility → take → threats
“Putin has threatened to use nuclear weapons in the past, and just hasn’t followed through,” says Glod. asserted
Glod → threaten → past
“And the thing about deterrence is, if you don’t follow through, it wears out.” asserted
it → follow → deterrence
Because of this, the Kremlin’s reliance on unfulfilled threats has done little other than reveal that Russia is severely constrained in how it can retaliate against Ukrainian deep strikes without risking a larger war with the West. asserted
it → do → West
Can the UK defend itself against Russian attack? asserted
UK → defend → attack
While an open military assault remains unlikely, the threats from Moscow have highlighted concerns over British air defence capabilities. asserted
threats → remain → capabilities
At present, Russia does have the capacity to strike the UK using its missile systems in Belarus. “The worry for the UK is it doesn’t have the air defence capacity to be able to defend against an air attack,” Glod says. asserted
Glod → have → attack
While several European allies rely on US-made Patriot air defence systems — widely recognised as the gold standard for tracking and intercepting high-speed ballistic and cruise targets — the UK does not field these systems. asserted
UK → rely → systems
Nevertheless, Glod stresses that a direct missile strike remains improbable. asserted
strike → stress → ?
“Russia doesn’t want to engage in active war with the UK,” she notes, “because it knows that Nato’s collective response would be far worse.” asserted
response → want → UK
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support