REBECCA ENGLISH: William is 'furious'... and as for the King, I can't even begin to convey his anger: Everything I'm hearing from inside the Palace after Earl Spencer's astonishing book claims

Read the original at Daily Mail ↗
Daily Mail · collected 2026-09-18 · by Rebecca English analysis

Quick Summary

Rebecca English reports that Prince William is furious over Earl Spencer's new book revealing details about Prince Charles's behavior after Princess Diana's death. The article suggests that the publication has caused significant tension within the royal family, with sources indicating William was initially "deeply disappointed" and later "furious." The King himself is reported to be highly angry at Spencer for his actions.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-18, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

In his forthcoming book "Swan Song: Diana, My Sister," Charles Spencer, Earl of Spencer, claims that then-Prince Charles sounded “giddily elated—like a lottery winner” after Princess Diana's death in 1997. This reaction is attributed to the possibility that he felt liberated from their marriage, allowing him to pursue his relationship with Camilla Parker Bowles.

Spencer also notes that Prince Charles informed him of having told Princes William and Harry about their mother’s death "first thing that morning, in their bedrooms at Balmoral." The book further suggests Diana had driven herself more than once to Beachy Head cliffs in East Sussex, contemplating suicide but ultimately deciding against it due to her love for her sons.

Buckingham Palace responded to these claims by stating, “While we do not comment on books as a matter of principle, His Majesty is mindful that the pain of fraternal grief can cloud reason and affect judgment and memory.” Despite this, no further response was given regarding the latest published excerpts.

Written for “Charles Reaction To Diana Death” on 2026-09-18, grounded in this article and the 42 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 17572 · logged 2026-09-18

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
42
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
19%
8 of 42 hedged
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Correction & hedging signals
58.6
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
43
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-18 · how these are computed

Story

📰 Charles Reaction To Diana Death
Politics · 43 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 19% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 8% hedged 2 of 26 📰 publisher trust 59
“The articles discuss related events and reactions to Earl Spencer's book claims about Prince Charles' behavior following Princess Diana's death, but they do not describe the exact same incident occurring at the same specific time.”
New York Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 12% hedged 3 of 26 📰 publisher trust 59
“Article A focuses on Prince Harry's knowledge and discussions about Earl Spencer's book, while Article B discusses William's reaction to the content of the book and its impact within the royal family.”
BBC News
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 23% hedged 7 of 31 📰 publisher trust 96
“Both articles discuss the controversy surrounding Earl Spencer's book and the reaction from Buckingham Palace, specifically mentioning King Charles' anger and denial of statements attributed to him about Princess Diana.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 23% hedged 9 of 39 📰 publisher trust 59
“Both articles discuss Earl Spencer's book claims about a confrontation with Prince Charles (now King) shortly after Princess Diana's death, indicating they are reporting on the same incident.”
Evening Standard
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 24% hedged 8 of 34 📰 publisher trust 67
“While both articles discuss Earl Spencer's new memoir and its claims about Charles (now King) after Princess Diana's death, they describe different aspects of the situation—Article A focuses on Buckingham Palace's response to the claims, while Article B highlights William's reaction and the impact of the book.”
Deutsche Welle
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 18% hedged 3 of 17 📰 publisher trust 95
“Both articles discuss the conflict between King Charles and Earl Spencer regarding Princess Diana's death as reported in a new book by Earl Spencer, indicating they are reporting on the same specific incident.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 24% hedged 5 of 21 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A describes Earl Spencer's claims about Charles's reaction to Diana's death and palace officials' concerns, while Article B discusses William's and others' reactions to Earl Spencer's book and its contents, which is a different event.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 20% hedged 9 of 44 📰 publisher trust 59
“Both articles report on the conflict between King Charles and Earl Spencer over Spencer's book 'Swan Song: Diana, My Sister', indicating it is the same specific incident.”
BBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 no claims extracted 📰 publisher trust 96
“Both articles discuss reactions to Earl Spencer's book and its impact on the royal family, indicating they are reporting on the same incident.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 21% hedged 6 of 29 📰 publisher trust 59
“Both articles discuss Earl Spencer's book claims about Queen Elizabeth offering to restore Princess Diana's royal title on the day of her funeral, indicating they are reporting on the same specific incident.”

Publisher

Daily Mail · 966 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)
2026-09-18
Woke NYC mayor offers condolences after alleged murderer, 20, dies in custody... but makes NO mention of his disabled victim
2026-09-15
Infamous prisoner known for his 'stop snitching' slogan DISAPPEARS during transfer from one federal prison to another
2026-09-15
Charles Manson's 'right-hand man' dies in prison at 83 after his parole was blocked 8 times
2026-09-15
Jeffrey Epstein's suicide watch 'companion' insists paedophile financier DID kill himself after becoming 'defeated' in his final days
2026-09-07
The evidence Epstein did NOT kill himself: Lawyer and pathologist reveal details they claim indicate the paedophile WAS murdered in jail in new documentary
2026-09-06
Clarifications and corrections

Who wrote this

Rebecca English
5 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Echoing increasing warnings from those in the industry, he said that AI 'risks developing darker capacities' to the extent it may 'perhaps even take life'.
🔮 In searing detail, EARL SPENCER recalls Charles's behaviour in the hours and days after Diana died - There will be more from the raw and revealing book on the Daily Mail tonight Published: | Updated: To the King’s supporters it is an act of revenge served so cold it comes with a layer of permafrost.
🔮 Prince William was smartly dressed in a dark suit, while Catherine wore an elegant green flowing dress and heels and carried a large umbrella.
🔮 She accepted some UK taxpayers might object but said the majority 'may consider answers are required'.
Also by Rebecca English
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Althorp Kensington Palace Sussex the Daily Mail the House of Windsor

Subjects

William PERSON · 8× Harry PERSON · 5× Diana PERSON · 4× EARL SPENCER PERSON · 4× Charles PERSON · 2× Palace ORG · 2× Earl Spencer’s PERSON · 1× Spencers PERSON · 1× the Daily Mail ORG · 1× the House of Windsor ORG · 1×

Narrative

In searing detail, EARL SPENCER recalls Charles's behaviour in the hours and days after Diana died - There will be more from the raw and revealing book on the Daily Mail tonight Published: | Updated: To the King’s supporters it is an act of revenge served so cold it comes with a layer of permafrost.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-18
🔮 In searing detail, EARL SPENCER recalls Charles's behaviour in the hours and days after Diana died - There will be more from the raw and revealing book on the Daily Mail tonight Published: | Updated: To the King’s supporters it is an act of revenge served so cold it comes with a layer of permafrost.

Claims (42 extracted, 8 hedged)

- Read the book so raw and revealing it has started a war of words with the King. asserted
it → read → King
In searing detail, EARL SPENCER recalls Charles's behaviour in the hours and days after Diana died - There will be more from the raw and revealing book on the Daily Mail tonight Published: | Updated: To the King’s supporters it is an act of revenge served so cold it comes with a layer of permafrost. asserted
it → recall → permafrost
While there has been little love lost between the House of Windsor and the Spencers over the decades, few predicted a hatchet-job of such deliberate spite. asserted
few → lose → spite
He has spent decades imploring those who continue to profit from his late mother’s memory to let her rest in peace. asserted
her → spend → peace
Now he must add his own uncle to that list. asserted
he → add → list
Whether Earl Spencer’s explosive book is truly an exercise in fraternal devotion – an overdue righting of the wrongs many feel were done to Diana before and after her death – may be a matter of opinion. uncertain
many → feel → opinion
But there is little doubt that he has flashed a finely honed scalpel to reopen old wounds. asserted
he → be → wounds
When news broke that the four-times married aristocrat had put pen to paper after almost 30 years, I was privately told William was ‘deeply disappointed’. asserted
William → break → years
‘What good can ever come of it?’ one source wondered. asserted
source → come → it
‘You can imagine how this has gone down,’ said another. asserted
another → imagine → ?
Yesterday I heard indirectly that William was ‘furious’. asserted
William → hear → ?
I can’t officially confirm that, as Kensington Palace is staying out of the fray, at least for now. asserted
Palace → confirm → fray
Let us not forget that the Prince of Wales is in an invidious position. asserted
Prince → let → position
His late mother’s resting place lies within the sprawling grounds of Althorp, the Spencer family seat. asserted
place → lie → Althorp
In other words: to get to her, William has to get through him. asserted
William → get → him
When news broke that the four-times married aristocrat Earl Spencer had put pen to paper after almost 30 years, I was privately told William was ‘deeply disappointed’, writes Rebecca English asserted
English → break → years
Of course Earl Spencer – who so memorably vowed at Diana’s funeral that William and Harry’s ‘blood family’ would protect her boys – would never deny William access to pay his respects. asserted
family → vow → respects
But one can only imagine how difficult this episode will be for the heir to the Throne, particularly knowing that his estranged brother, Harry, has recently forged such a close relationship with their uncle. asserted
brother → imagine → uncle
It is a moot point whether the Duke of Sussex knew precisely what was coming. asserted
what → know → Sussex
Some have reported that he was ‘aware’ of what was written in the book, and some have wondered if it might have come up when the two men met during the Sussexes’ recent stay at Althorp. uncertain
men → report → Althorp
Others, however, claim that like the King and Prince William, Harry was not informed about the book’s contents because security was supposedly so tight around the final manuscript – this week’s theft of the Dutch-language edition notwithstanding. uncertain
security → claim → edition
As for the King, it’s difficult for me to convey the true sense of anger and disappointment at what Earl Spencer has done. asserted
Spencer → ’ → what
On Wednesday night, when the Mail reported the book’s sensational claim that the then-Prince of Wales said of Diana ‘we will forget her soon enough’ shortly after she died, it took just 90 minutes for the Palace to respond. uncertain
Palace → report → minutes
The speed of that response shows just how much the claim incensed the King’s senior officials and the monarch himself. uncertain
claim → show → officials
The statement broke the Palace’s long-held mantra of refusing to comment on any royal biography or memoir (even Harry’s) as a matter of principle. asserted
statement → break → principle
But the phrasing used to rebut the earl’s claims, clearly designed to inflict maximum damage, was the biggest clue as to how they truly feel: ‘His Majesty is mindful that the pain of fraternal grief can cloud reason, affect judgment and colour memory in ways others do not recognise, even many years after such a loss.’ uncertain
others → use → loss
‘“Recollections may vary” on steroids,’ one former courtier remarked to me, referring, of course, to Queen Elizabeth’s famously masterful reaction to Harry and Meghan’s bombshell Oprah interview. uncertain
courtier → vary → interview
There seems little doubt that a conversation between Charles and the earl took place in those fraught days back in 1997. asserted
conversation → seem → 1997
But there are only two men in the world who know exactly what was said – and both have wildly different memories of what was discussed, and of the emotions and language used. asserted
what → be → emotions
For what it’s worth, I am told that Earl Spencer, as a historian, has always been a strict note-taker. asserted
Spencer → ’ → historian
Earl Spencer memorably vowed at Diana’s funeral that William and Harry’s ‘blood family’ would protect her boys Julian Payne, the King’s former communications secretary, told the BBC yesterday: ‘I personally was working for (Charles) during the 20th anniversary of the late princess’s death in 2017... asserted
I → vow → 2017
He was very clear that there was never to be any criticism, never to be any pushback on the narratives that were usually highly critical of him – but he was absolutely emphatic that we were to respect her memory and not undermine it in any way. asserted
we → be → way
‘It seems to me very odd that in the moment itself, with the grief of his family and his own shock, that he would choose that moment to use those words. asserted
he → seem → words
It’s just not language that I recognise.’ asserted
I → ’ → that
Another friend of the King candidly admitted to me that the breakdown of his marriage to Diana had been ‘wretched’ and there were ‘wrongs on both sides’. asserted
breakdown → admit → sides
But they empathised how ‘paralysed’ he was with shock, grief and, yes, self-recrimination. asserted
he → empathise → shock
They also point out that it was Charles who went against both the initial wishes of his own family, and that of Diana’s, for her to be treated as a private citizen. asserted
her → point → citizen
And it was Charles who insisted on flying to Paris to bring his ex-wife’s body back home. asserted
who → insist → body
By all accounts, he even fought for Diana to be afforded a full state funeral. asserted
Diana → fight → funeral
Why, they ask, would Charles have wanted her to be ‘forgotten’ or diminished in any way, when he was privately battling for her to be given greater recognition? asserted
her → ask → recognition
…and 2 more, not listed.
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support