Story summary
In his forthcoming book "Swan Song: Diana, My Sister," Charles Spencer, Earl of Spencer, claims that then-Prince Charles sounded “giddily elated—like a lottery winner” after Princess Diana's death in 1997. This reaction is attributed to the possibility that he felt liberated from their marriage, allowing him to pursue his relationship with Camilla Parker Bowles.
Spencer also notes that Prince Charles informed him of having told Princes William and Harry about their mother’s death "first thing that morning, in their bedrooms at Balmoral." The book further suggests Diana had driven herself more than once to Beachy Head cliffs in East Sussex, contemplating suicide but ultimately deciding against it due to her love for her sons.
Buckingham Palace responded to these claims by stating, “While we do not comment on books as a matter of principle, His Majesty is mindful that the pain of fraternal grief can cloud reason and affect judgment and memory.” Despite this, no further response was given regarding the latest published excerpts.
Written for “Charles Reaction To Diana Death” on 2026-09-18,
grounded in this article and the 42 other(s) covering the same event.
- Read the book so raw and revealing it has started a war of words with the King.
asserted
it → read → King
In searing detail, EARL SPENCER recalls Charles's behaviour in the hours and days after Diana died
- There will be more from the raw and revealing book on the Daily Mail tonight
Published: | Updated:
To the King’s supporters it is an act of revenge served so cold it comes with a layer of permafrost.
asserted
it → recall → permafrost
While there has been little love lost between the House of Windsor and the Spencers over the decades, few predicted a hatchet-job of such deliberate spite.
asserted
few → lose → spite
He has spent decades imploring those who continue to profit from his late mother’s memory to let her rest in peace.
asserted
her → spend → peace
Now he must add his own uncle to that list.
asserted
he → add → list
Whether Earl Spencer’s explosive book is truly an exercise in fraternal devotion – an overdue righting of the wrongs many feel were done to Diana before and after her death – may be a matter of opinion.
uncertain
many → feel → opinion
But there is little doubt that he has flashed a finely honed scalpel to reopen old wounds.
asserted
he → be → wounds
When news broke that the four-times married aristocrat had put pen to paper after almost 30 years, I was privately told William was ‘deeply disappointed’.
asserted
William → break → years
‘What good can ever come of it?’ one source wondered.
asserted
source → come → it
‘You can imagine how this has gone down,’ said another.
asserted
another → imagine → ?
Yesterday I heard indirectly that William was ‘furious’.
asserted
William → hear → ?
I can’t officially confirm that, as Kensington Palace is staying out of the fray, at least for now.
asserted
Palace → confirm → fray
Let us not forget that the Prince of Wales is in an invidious position.
asserted
Prince → let → position
His late mother’s resting place lies within the sprawling grounds of Althorp, the Spencer family seat.
asserted
place → lie → Althorp
In other words: to get to her, William has to get through him.
asserted
William → get → him
When news broke that the four-times married aristocrat Earl Spencer had put pen to paper after almost 30 years, I was privately told William was ‘deeply disappointed’, writes Rebecca English
asserted
English → break → years
Of course Earl Spencer – who so memorably vowed at Diana’s funeral that William and Harry’s ‘blood family’ would protect her boys – would never deny William access to pay his respects.
asserted
family → vow → respects
But one can only imagine how difficult this episode will be for the heir to the Throne, particularly knowing that his estranged brother, Harry, has recently forged such a close relationship with their uncle.
asserted
brother → imagine → uncle
It is a moot point whether the Duke of Sussex knew precisely what was coming.
asserted
what → know → Sussex
Some have reported that he was ‘aware’ of what was written in the book, and some have wondered if it might have come up when the two men met during the Sussexes’ recent stay at Althorp.
uncertain
men → report → Althorp
Others, however, claim that like the King and Prince William, Harry was not informed about the book’s contents because security was supposedly so tight around the final manuscript – this week’s theft of the Dutch-language edition notwithstanding.
uncertain
security → claim → edition
As for the King, it’s difficult for me to convey the true sense of anger and disappointment at what Earl Spencer has done.
asserted
Spencer → ’ → what
On Wednesday night, when the Mail reported the book’s sensational claim that the then-Prince of Wales said of Diana ‘we will forget her soon enough’ shortly after she died, it took just 90 minutes for the Palace to respond.
uncertain
Palace → report → minutes
The speed of that response shows just how much the claim incensed the King’s senior officials and the monarch himself.
uncertain
claim → show → officials
The statement broke the Palace’s long-held mantra of refusing to comment on any royal biography or memoir (even Harry’s) as a matter of principle.
asserted
statement → break → principle
But the phrasing used to rebut the earl’s claims, clearly designed to inflict maximum damage, was the biggest clue as to how they truly feel: ‘His Majesty is mindful that the pain of fraternal grief can cloud reason, affect judgment and colour memory in ways others do not recognise, even many years after such a loss.’
uncertain
others → use → loss
‘“Recollections may vary” on steroids,’ one former courtier remarked to me, referring, of course, to Queen Elizabeth’s famously masterful reaction to Harry and Meghan’s bombshell Oprah interview.
uncertain
courtier → vary → interview
There seems little doubt that a conversation between Charles and the earl took place in those fraught days back in 1997.
asserted
conversation → seem → 1997
But there are only two men in the world who know exactly what was said – and both have wildly different memories of what was discussed, and of the emotions and language used.
asserted
what → be → emotions
For what it’s worth, I am told that Earl Spencer, as a historian, has always been a strict note-taker.
asserted
Spencer → ’ → historian
Earl Spencer memorably vowed at Diana’s funeral that William and Harry’s ‘blood family’ would protect her boys
Julian Payne, the King’s former communications secretary, told the BBC yesterday: ‘I personally was working for (Charles) during the 20th anniversary of the late princess’s death in 2017...
asserted
I → vow → 2017
He was very clear that there was never to be any criticism, never to be any pushback on the narratives that were usually highly critical of him – but he was absolutely emphatic that we were to respect her memory and not undermine it in any way.
asserted
we → be → way
‘It seems to me very odd that in the moment itself, with the grief of his family and his own shock, that he would choose that moment to use those words.
asserted
he → seem → words
It’s just not language that I recognise.’
asserted
I → ’ → that
Another friend of the King candidly admitted to me that the breakdown of his marriage to Diana had been ‘wretched’ and there were ‘wrongs on both sides’.
asserted
breakdown → admit → sides
But they empathised how ‘paralysed’ he was with shock, grief and, yes, self-recrimination.
asserted
he → empathise → shock
They also point out that it was Charles who went against both the initial wishes of his own family, and that of Diana’s, for her to be treated as a private citizen.
asserted
her → point → citizen
And it was Charles who insisted on flying to Paris to bring his ex-wife’s body back home.
asserted
who → insist → body
By all accounts, he even fought for Diana to be afforded a full state funeral.
asserted
Diana → fight → funeral
Why, they ask, would Charles have wanted her to be ‘forgotten’ or diminished in any way, when he was privately battling for her to be given greater recognition?
asserted
her → ask → recognition
…and 2 more, not listed.