Council in Sydney moves state-first ban on 'pervert glasses' at pools

Read the original at ABC News (AU) ↗
ABC News (AU) · collected 2026-09-17 · by Miriah Davis

Quick Summary

Canterbury-Bankstown Council in Sydney voted on Tuesday to ban smart glasses from its leisure and aquatic centers due to concerns over potential misuse by individuals seeking to secretly film others. The unanimous decision follows community worries about "perverts and paedophiles" exploiting the technology for covert filming in change rooms and pools. Lord Mayor Bilal El-Hayek emphasized that staff will be trained to enforce this new ban, which also includes provisions allowing exceptions for those using smart glasses as visual aids with prior permission.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-18, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

On Tuesday evening, Canterbury-Bankstown Council, one of Sydney's largest councils, voted unanimously to ban AI-powered smart glasses at its public pools. The council’s mayor, Bilal El-Hayek, referred to these devices as "pervert glasses," expressing concern over their potential misuse by predators who could secretly film in change rooms and around schools. Smart glasses are wearable tech with high-resolution cameras that can record, share footage, scan faces, and retrieve personal information. The ban is part of a growing trend following similar prohibitions issued by the City of Brisbane and the City of Yarra. El-Hayek highlighted community concerns about privacy and safety threats posed by unauthorized filming without consent.

Written for “Ban On Pervert Glasses In Pools Sydney” on 2026-09-18, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it +0.35, but none of the 3 quote(s) it offered could be found in the article text, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 17008: no verified evidence · logged 2026-09-18

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
33
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
15%
5 of 33 hedged
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Correction & hedging signals
60.3
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
2
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-18 · how these are computed

Story

📰 Ban On Pervert Glasses In Pools Sydney
Politics · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 15% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Guardian · 0.88 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 8% hedged 2 of 24 📰 publisher trust 95
“Both articles describe the same council voting to ban smart glasses at local pools on the same day and cite similar reasons involving concerns over privacy and exploitation.”

Publisher

ABC News (AU) · 627 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)
2026-09-15
Canberra man posed as teenage girl to obtain child abuse material
2026-09-07
'Her career's finished': Fugitive Sydney developer's daughter avoids jail

Who wrote this

Miriah Davis
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Lord Mayor Bilal El-Hayek cited concerns the technology could be exploited by "perverts and paedophiles".
🔮 "I just did what I think anyone else would do in that situation [when] you see a guy with a knife and two young boys," Mr Karagiannis said.
Also by Miriah Davis
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Canterbury-Bankstown Council Greens Our Local Community Sydney the City of Canterbury Bankstown

Subjects

Bilal El-Hayek PERSON · 2× El-Hayek PERSON · 2× Sydney GPE · 2× Canterbury-Bankstown Council ORG · 1× Conroy Blood PERSON · 1× Greens ORG · 1× Harry Stavrinos PERSON · 1× New South Wales GPE · 1× Our Local Community ORG · 1× the City of Canterbury Bankstown GPE · 1×

Narrative

"On the other hand, if you're standing in the street talking to someone quietly, people would think that is a private conversation and in New South Wales, that means that the other person cannot record that conversation unless they come into a defence, which are very limited."
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-18
🔮 Lord Mayor Bilal El-Hayek cited concerns the technology could be exploited by "perverts and paedophiles".
2026-09-18 · ABC News (AU)
Council in Sydney moves state-first ban on 'pervert glasses' at pools · assertive framing

Claims (33 extracted, 5 hedged)

In short: Canterbury-Bankstown Council has voted in favour to ban smart glasses from its leisure centres and pools, in a motion passed on Tuesday. asserted
Council → vote → Tuesday
Lord Mayor Bilal El-Hayek cited concerns the technology could be exploited by "perverts and paedophiles". uncertain
technology → cite → perverts
The ban would allow staff to eject people with smart glasses from centres in the local government area. asserted
staff → allow → area
A Sydney council has moved to ban smart glasses from local leisure centres and pools, citing concerns the devices could be exploited by "perverts and paedophiles". uncertain
devices → move → perverts
This week, councillors from the City of Canterbury Bankstown unanimously passed a motion banning them from its five council-operated leisure and aquatic centres over their potential for misuse. asserted
councillors → pass → misuse
During the meeting, Lord Mayor Bilal El-Hayek said there was community concern surrounding "perverts and paedophiles secretly filming in change rooms, swimming pools and around schools". asserted
Hayek → say → schools
The ban strengthens existing conditions of entry, which already prohibit unauthorised photography and recording. asserted
which → strengthen → photography
AI-enabled smart glasses would be added to prohibition signage. asserted
glasses → enable → signage
Councillor with Our Local Community party Harry Stavrinos on Tuesday said while he agreed with the proposal, he questioned how staff would be able to distinguish standard glasses from smart glasses. asserted
staff → say → glasses
Greens Councillor Conroy Blood asked that the measure considered people with vision impairment who use the devices as visual aids. asserted
who → ask → aids
Cr El-Hayek said people who required the glasses for accessibility purposes would be allowed entry, "if they seek permission first". asserted
they → say → permission
He said staff would undergo training to learn how to properly enforce the ban. asserted
staff → say → ban
"Covert filming, and filming without consent is not acceptable and those not complying should have their equipment confiscated and be removed from the facility," the mayor said. asserted
mayor → comply → facility
It is the first council in New South Wales to introduce a ban, but follows Brisbane City Council in Queensland, and Yarra Council in Victoria, which recently announced broader bans in leisure centres, childcare centres and playgrounds. asserted
which → introduce → centres
Adelaide City Council is also considering the measure. asserted
Council → consider → measure
Cr El-Hayek told the ABC the measure addressed "unscrupulous use of the technology", while respecting community privacy. "Mums are telling me they want very clear guidelines to protect their children from preying predators," he said. asserted
he → tell → predators
Canterbury-Bankstown Council's ban is in response to increasing concerns about safety and privacy, particularly from women, who have reported being secretly filmed and posted online. asserted
who → increase → women
Sydney-based lawyer Tony Taouk said in NSW, the Surveillance Devices Act generally prohibited a person from using a listening device to record private conversations, unless a statutory exception applied. asserted
exception → base → conversations
He said people often wrongly assumed they were generally protected from being recorded under the Privacy Act. asserted
they → say → Act
"Believe it or not, the Privacy Act doesn't apply to these cases of recording someone. asserted
Act → believe → someone
It's often misunderstood," he said. asserted
he → misunderstand → ?
"It regulates agencies, organisations and businesses in relation to personal information. asserted
It → regulate → information
"It doesn't generally determine whether one private individual may secretly record another." uncertain
individual → determine → another
Mr Taouk said as technologies advance at a faster pace, the safest course was transparency and that consent should be obtained before recording someone. asserted
consent → say → someone
"Consent will often avoid many of the legal issues that arise when there are covert recordings," he said. asserted
he → avoid → issues
"You can't assume just because your phone [device] allows you to record a conversation, the law automatically allows you to use or publish a recording." asserted
you → assume → recording
Barbara McDonald from the University of Sydney Law School said people had to be careful with the use of any device to record a private conversation in the state, including one they are party to. asserted
they → say → one
"One thing to note is that there is very significant divergence in surveillance device legislation around the country," Emeritus Professor McDonald said. asserted
McDonald → note → country
For example in Victoria, if you are a member of the conversation, you can record that private conversation without consent, she said. asserted
she → record → consent
Private vs public Emeritus Professor McDonald said the legal definition of a private conversation was any words spoken by one person to another, with the intention to be heard among themselves. asserted
definition → say → themselves
She said the definition covered conversations involving several or more people, but excluded situations where there was a reasonable expectation it could be overheard by others. uncertain
it → say → others
"If you're having a loud conversation on the phone while you're sitting on the bus or the train, or even in the street, you know, you're sitting down on some steps at lunchtime and you're talking loudly, you could not have a reasonable expectation that it might not be overheard by other people," she said. uncertain
she → have → people
"On the other hand, if you're standing in the street talking to someone quietly, people would think that is a private conversation and in New South Wales, that means that the other person cannot record that conversation unless they come into a defence, which are very limited." asserted
which → stand → defence
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support