Photo via Washington Examiner

DOJ sues California city over ‘illogical’ $1,600 gun permit fee

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Deese, K. (2026, September 17). DOJ sues California city over ‘illogical’ $1,600 gun permit fee. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/4731487/doj-sues-san-jose-california-gun-permit-fee/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-17 · by Kaelan Deese

Quick Summary

The Justice Department has sued San Jose, California, over its $1,591 concealed carry permit fee, arguing it is unconstitutional and disproportionately high compared to other major cities like New York ($340) and Chicago ($125). Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon contends the fee impedes residents’ Second Amendment rights by pricing them out of obtaining a permit. San Jose’s city attorney counters that the fee covers actual administrative costs, including nearly seven hours of staff time at $1,243.52 and additional overhead expenses. The lawsuit is part of broader challenges following the 2022 Supreme Court ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, which struck down similar restrictive measures but allowed for fees that reflect legitimate administrative costs.
Written by AI on 2026-09-17, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The Justice Department filed a lawsuit against San Jose, California, on Wednesday over its $1,591 concealed carry permit fee, alleging that it imposes an unconstitutional barrier to exercising Second Amendment rights. Federal officials argue that the fee is the highest in the nation and far exceeds comparable charges in cities such as New York, Washington, Boston, and Chicago. Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon stated that charging a fee several times higher than the cost of the firearm itself is illogical and impedes Americans’ Second Amendment rights. San Jose increased the permit fee to $1,591 in June, nearly $300 above its previous level, prompting the DOJ’s legal challenge over whether this charge reflects legitimate administrative costs or infringes on constitutional rights.

Written for “Gun Permit Fee Lawsuit” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Gun Permit Fee Lawsuit
Crime & Law · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
26
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
4%
1 of 26 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
70/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-17 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 3907 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Kaelan Deese
45 article(s) here · 0 carrying a prediction
🔮 A federal judge grilled former FBI Director James Comey’s attorneys on Friday over whether their effort to dismiss the Justice Department’s latest criminal case could become “a great exercise in futility” if a grand jury returns an indictment alleging more recent conduct.
🔮 Alaska Democratic Senate nominee Mary Peltola’s campaign could face demands for records revealing who financed an effort to recruit a second Dan Sullivan to enter the race as the Justice Department seeks discovery in its Alaska election lawsuit — and now accuses her campaign committee and national Democrats of misleading the court about the operation.
🔮 The campaigns could offer lessons for anti-abortion groups, which have struggled to win statewide abortion votes since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022.
🔮 U.S. District Judge David Carter, an appointee of former President Bill Clinton, rejected the department’s request to require election officials to hold the flagged voters’ ballots until their citizenship could be verified.
🔮 Voters in six states will soon decide whether to impose or expand voter identification requirements, including rules requiring mail voters to provide part of a driver’s license or Social Security number.
🔮 Just hours after issuing what a Trump administration lawyer called an “untenable” command from the bench, a federal judge withdrew her order that would have forced the Department of Justice to refile a court brief with the names of career attorneys who agreed with it, reversing course Monday after a court hearing about golf course renovations stretched beyond six hours.
🔮 The defense argued that the prosecution relies on a novel interpretation of the law and that Van Dyke lacked fair notice that trading on the information could violate federal law.
🔮 His petition arrives as Democrats in Washington are preparing investigations for a possible return to House control in January 2027, while President Donald Trump’s allies are organizing legal defenses for officials who could be called to testify or produce records.
🔮 He warned that the proposal would damage the Public Integrity Section’s reputation, adding that officials “might as well rename the damn thing the Anti-MAGA Task Force.”
🔮 “I’m not even sure that we need to reinvent the wheel,” Delangue said at Politico‘s Decoded Summit on Sept. 16, arguing that existing cybersecurity laws may still be effective at handling mishandled or out-of-control agentic models.
2026-10-04 · assertive framing · Does rogue AI require a new rulebook?
Also by Kaelan Deese
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 45 articles by Kaelan Deese →

Topics

California New York San Jose San Jose’s Second Amendment

Subjects

California GPE · 4× San Jose GPE · 4× Wood PERSON · 3× Americans NORP · 2× New York GPE · 2× San Jose’s GPE · 2× Washington GPE · 2× Boston GPE · 1× Chicago GPE · 1× The Justice Department ORG · 1×

Narrative

The lawsuit targets the California city and its police department, escalating a dispute over whether the city’s $1,591 charge reflects legitimate administrative costs or imposes an unconstitutional barrier to carrying a firearm for self-defense.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-17
2026-09-17 · Washington Examiner
DOJ sues California city over ‘illogical’ $1,600 gun permit fee · assertive framing

Claims (26 extracted, 1 hedged)

The Justice Department filed a lawsuit against San Jose, California, on Wednesday over its nearly $1,600 concealed carry permit fee, alleging the city has priced ordinary residents out of exercising their Second Amendment rights. asserted
city → file → rights
The lawsuit targets the California city and its police department, escalating a dispute over whether the city’s $1,591 charge reflects legitimate administrative costs or imposes an unconstitutional barrier to carrying a firearm for self-defense. asserted
charge → target → defense
Federal officials described San Jose’s fee as the highest in the nation, saying it far exceeds comparable charges in cities including New York, Washington, Boston, and Chicago. asserted
it → describe → York
“All law-abiding Americans have a constitutional right to bear arms for self-defense,” Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon said in a statement announcing the lawsuit. asserted
Dhillon → abide → lawsuit
“This right is not a luxury reserved for a privileged few, but a fundamental element of our republic. asserted
right → reserve → republic
You don’t need a law degree to recognize that charging a fee several times higher than the cost of the firearm itself is illogical, and an unconstitutional attempt to impede Americans’ Second Amendment rights.” asserted
charging → need → rights
San Jose increased the fee to $1,591 in June, nearly $300 above the rate it established just over two years prior. asserted
it → increase → rate
Applicants must pay $318 upfront and the remaining $1,273 when their licenses are issued, according to the complaint. uncertain
licenses → pay → complaint
Psychological testing carries an additional cost. asserted
testing → carry → cost
The department contrasted those charges with San Francisco’s $144 fee and Berkeley, California’s $255 application fee, followed by $325 upon approval. asserted
department → contrast → approval
Washington charges $75 to apply, while New York charges $340 for a three-year license, federal lawyers said. asserted
lawyers → charge → license
San Jose City Attorney Susana Alcala Wood defended the fee in a letter responding to Dhillon, arguing it reflects the city’s actual expenses. asserted
it → defend → expenses
Wood said processing an application requires just under seven hours of staff time, accounting for $1,243.52, with another $347.55 attributed to indirect overhead. asserted
347.55 → say → overhead
She also said the city had reduced the staff time required from eight hours. asserted
city → say → hours
“Contrary to your assertions, a department looking to erect barriers to the exercise of a Constitutional right does not go out of its way to make its own process more efficient,” Wood wrote. asserted
Wood → look → way
But the department argues that the fee lacks any historical comparison with others, pointing out that it is outrageous in part because it exceeds the average cost of some firearms. asserted
it → argue → firearms
The dispute centers in part on the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, which struck down the Empire State’s requirement that applicants demonstrate a special need to carry a handgun in public. asserted
applicants → center → public
The ruling also left room for additional challenges to licensing systems whose excessive fees or lengthy delays prevent ordinary citizens from exercising that right. asserted
fees → leave → right
Wood argued the court’s warning about fees does not invalidate San Jose’s charges because they are supported by a time-and-cost analysis. asserted
they → argue → analysis
The Washington Examiner spoke to a gun store owner in San Jose on Thursday morning in response to the lawsuit’s filing. asserted
Examiner → speak → filing
“Most departments [in the state] charge $500. … asserted
departments → charge → 500
Now after everything is said and done, you’re looking at over $2,000 in fees,” the store owner, who wished to remain anonymous, said of the city’s permitting regime. asserted
who → say → regime
“They’re making hand-over-fist with money with this one,” the store owner added. asserted
owner → make → one
“And if you start the process today for an application, I’ve heard some people waiting to get approval by the following Christmas.” asserted
people → start → Christmas
The case follows another DOJ challenge to concealed-carry permitting practices in California. asserted
case → follow → California
The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department settled a federal lawsuit last month over application delays, agreeing to comply with state processing deadlines. asserted
Department → settle → deadlines
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support