Hours after the Supreme Court suspended the sentences of human rights lawyer Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and her husband, Hadi Ali Chattha, in a controversial social media posts case, the two were sent on judicial remand in another case registered at the Islamabad Kohsar police station, Imaan’s mother and lawyer confirmed.
asserted
mother → suspend → station
Former federal minister Shireen Mazari confirmed the development, saying attempts were being made to keep the couple in jail.
asserted
attempts → confirm → jail
Speaking to Dawn, Imaan’s counsel Riasat Ali Azad also confirmed the development, saying a large contingent of Islamabad police had shifted the couple to Kohsar police station.
asserted
contingent → speak → station
ATC Judge Abul Hasnat Muhammad Zulqarnain, who was present at the station, subsequently sent the two on judicial remand in FIR No. 276/2025 registered at Kohsar police station, said the counsel.
asserted
counsel → send → station
SC suspends sentences
asserted
SC → suspend → sentences
Earlier today, the apex court suspended their sentences after a two-judge SC bench, headed by Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan and Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim, took up the couple’s appeals against the Islamabad High Court’s (IHC) refusal in February to suspend the sentences.
asserted
bench → suspend → sentences
On January 24, an Islamabad sessions court sentenced Imaan and Hadi to a total of 17 years in jail on multiple charges under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (Peca).
asserted
court → sentence → Act
The convictions of the couple, who had already been jailed the day before in a separate case, were widely condemned by lawyers and United Nations (UN) experts.
asserted
who → jail → lawyers
On Thursday, the SC granted the couple bail against surety bonds of Rs200,000 and ordered their release pending the IHC’s final verdict.
asserted
SC → grant → verdict
“Both are lawyers and we are keeping their honour,” observed Justice Afghan, but also asked senior counsel Faisal Siddiqui, the couple’s lawyer, to tell the appellants to observe the court’s decorum.
asserted
Siddiqui → keep → decorum
“There is a difference between a lawyer and an ordinary person,” the judge observed.
asserted
judge → be → lawyer
According to a written order, the SC converted the petitions of both Imaan and Hadi into appeals and suspended the operation of the January 24 conviction.
uncertain
SC → accord → conviction
The court also ordered the release of petitioners — noting they were practising advocates — on bail till the decision of their pending appeals before IHC.
asserted
they → order → IHC
The release was subject to furnishing personal surety bonds worth Rs200,000 for each with the SC’s additional registrar (judicial).
asserted
release → furnish → registrar
The SC will issue a detailed verdict on the case later.
asserted
SC → issue → case
Earlier, the SC had repeatedly adjourned hearings in the case on the grounds that the IHC had fixed their application for suspension of sentence along with the main appeal.
asserted
IHC → adjourn → appeal
During Thursday’s hearing, Siddiqui argued that the SC had issued its first order on May 12 in which the IHC was asked to decide the applicants’ petition for suspension of sentence as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two weeks.
uncertain
IHC → argue → weeks
On May 12, the SC ordered the IHC to decide Imaan and Hadi’s sentence suspension pleas within two weeks.
uncertain
SC → order → weeks
Despite the May 26 deadline having already passed, the National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency (NCCIA) challenged the SC order and sought its withdrawal.
uncertain
Agency → pass → withdrawal
During the proceedings, Siddiqui also read out the order sheets from various IHC hearings.
asserted
Siddiqui → read → hearings
At one point, the SC directed Additional Attorney General (AAG) Rana Asadullah Khan, who was standing at the rostrum, to take a seat, adding that the court will hear Siddiqui first.
“Let him sit, though he has certainly worn us out,” Siddiqui quipped and cited former chief justice Asif Saeed Khosa’s remarks that a case would only be adjourned upon the death of a judge or a lawyer.
asserted
case → direct → judge
The counsel regretted that the IHC adjourned the case multiple times and that his clients’ request for an early hearing was rejected by the high court’s registrar office.
asserted
request → regret → office
“What transpired at the high court came as a surprise to us,” the counsel said.
asserted
counsel → transpire → us
“These days are an era of surprises,” remarked Justice Ibrahim.
asserted
Ibrahim → remark → surprises
During the hearing, the AAG contended that the IHC has not yet issued any adverse ruling, adding that seven opportunities were provided in the trial court.
asserted
opportunities → contend → court
He highlighted that the judicial forum for the suspension of a sentence under Section 426 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) was the high court.
asserted
forum → highlight → Procedure
Justice Afghan observed that the IHC always cited the SC directives for early disposal of the case but does not act upon them.
asserted
IHC → observe → them
The judge also asked AAG Khan whether he would give any assurance that proceedings would be held at the next IHC hearing, to which the latter replied that he cannot represent any high court judge in the SC.
asserted
he → ask → SC
Later, the SC suspended the sentence of the applicants and ordered their release on bail, pending the IHC’s final verdict.
asserted
SC → suspend → verdict
In their applications, the applicants had stated that it was a settled policy of the SC that criminal matters have to be given priority, especially when the matters pertain to bail or suspension of sentence.
asserted
matters → state → sentence
Moreover, in Section 7 of the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Act, 2023, it was expressly stated that any application pleading urgency shall be fixed for hearing within a period of 14 days.
asserted
application → state → days
The application contended that Imaan was a young female lawyer and has remained incarcerated for a long period of time in a case where conviction was the “result of a sham trial”.
asserted
conviction → contend → trial
The case
Imaan and Hadi have been in jail since their arrest on January 23 in a case registered against them for protesting outside the IHC and allegedly manhandling the IHC Bar Association (IHCBA) president.
uncertain
Imaan → register → president
The arrest prompted criticism by rights bodies, politicians and journalists, who stressed the couple’s right to a fair trial.
asserted
who → prompt → trial
Just a day later, a sessions court convicted Imaan and Hadi in the social media posts case.
asserted
court → convict → case
It sentenced the duo to 10 years’ imprisonment under Section 10 (cyber terrorism), five years’ imprisonment under Section 9 (glorification of an offence) and two years’ imprisonment under Section 26-A (false and fake information) of Peca.
asserted
It → sentence → Peca
All sentences were to run concurrently.
asserted
sentences → run → ?
The case stemmed from a complaint filed on Aug 12, 2025 by the assistant director (investigating officer) at the NCCIA Islamabad, before the Federal Investigation Agency’s Cybercrime Reporting Centre.
asserted
case → stem → Centre
The complaint accused Imaan of disseminating and “propagating narratives that align with hostile terrorist groups and proscribed organisations”, while her husband was implicated for reposting some of her posts.
asserted
husband → accuse → posts
The first information report (FIR) in the case alleged that the two held security forces responsible for cases of missing persons in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan.
It also stated that they had portrayed the armed forces as ineffective against proscribed groups, including the banned outfits Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) and the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP).
asserted
they → allege → outfits
…and 8 more, not listed.
The Aporia
