Truth behind Paramount’s high stakes game of cat and mouse as threat to leave LA sparks chaos

Read the original at New York Post ↗
New York Post · collected 2026-09-17 · by mliss1578

Quick Summary

Rob Bonta, California's Attorney General, is reported to have received threats from David Ellison, CEO of Paramount Skydance, that the company will leave California if it does not get its way in an ongoing antitrust case. The threat has caused concern among city officials but Bonta remains resolute, stating he would rather settle but is willing to take the case to trial. A court-supervised settlement conference between the parties is scheduled for October 14 and 15, adding urgency to the situation as Paramount prepares a potential announcement about its future in California.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-17, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Paramount, one of Hollywood's last major studios based in California, has threatened to leave the state over an $111 billion merger with Warner Bros. Discovery that faces antitrust litigation from California Attorney General Rob Bonta and 12 other states. As of October 1, Paramount seemed poised to announce its departure but backed down at the last minute due to ongoing negotiations. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass vowed to protect entertainment jobs in Hollywood, which have been a vital part of LA's economy for over a century. However, sources within Paramount indicated they remain "deadly serious" about leaving unless antitrust concerns are addressed. The studio faces a court-supervised settlement conference on October 14-15, complicating any immediate move out of California.

Written for “Paramount Leaving Hollywood” on 2026-09-17, grounded in this article and the 2 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it +0.35, but none of the 5 quote(s) it offered could be found in the article text, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 16152: no verified evidence · logged 2026-09-17

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
52
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
6%
3 of 52 hedged
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Correction & hedging signals
59.3
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
3
Entertainment
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-17 · how these are computed

Story

📰 Paramount Leaving Hollywood
Entertainment · 3 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 6% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post · 0.86 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 7% hedged 1 of 14 📰 publisher trust 59
“Both articles discuss Paramount's threat to leave California due to ongoing antitrust litigation on the same day and context.”
Daily Mail · 0.85 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 15% hedged 4 of 27 📰 publisher trust 59
“Both articles discuss Paramount's threat to leave California unless an agreement is reached regarding the anti-trust lawsuit, indicating they are reporting on the same specific incident.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 7% hedged 1 of 15 📰 publisher trust 96
“The articles describe different stages of the conflict involving Paramount and California's Attorney General, not the exact same incident.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 14% hedged 6 of 42 📰 publisher trust 96
“While both articles discuss Rob Bonta's actions against Paramount, they describe different aspects of the situation: Article A focuses on the broad coalition opposing Bonta's lawsuit, while Article B details a specific threat by David Ellison to move Paramount out of California.”

Publisher

New York Post · 1049 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)
2026-09-15
Fast food chains are making a major shift in customer service amid complaints of a ‘lonely and disconnected’ store experience
2026-09-15
Are Cocoa Puffs Maria Sten’s Favorite Cereal? The ‘Reacher’ and ‘Neagley’ Star Sets The Record Straight: “I Have to Make Clarifications”
2026-09-06
Long Island inmates in jail on drug charges use photo program to get clean
2026-09-06
‘Landman’ Season 3 Release Date Update: When Does ‘Landman’ Return With New Episodes?

Who wrote this

No reporter is named on this article, beyond the feed's “mliss1578”.

Topics

Bonta California Hollywood Paramount TMZ

Subjects

Paramount ORG · 16× Bonta PERSON · 7× Bass PERSON · 6× California GPE · 6× TMZ ORG · 3× Hollywood GPE · 2× Newsom PERSON · 2× David Ellison’s PERSON · 1× Paramount Skydance ORG · 1× Rob Bonta PERSON · 1×

Narrative

We remain hopeful and stand ready to continue good faith discussions to resolve the attorneys general suit and move forward with our plans for increased competition and increased output to the benefit of the talent and entertainment workers.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-17
🔮 It appears Rob Bonta called David Ellison’s bluff this week when the CEO of Paramount Skydance reportedly back-channelled a threat to the California Attorney General’s office — and the Los Angeles Mayor’s office — that he’d officially announce Paramount’s move out of California, regardless of a settlement in the ongoing antitrust case.

Claims (52 extracted, 3 hedged)

It’s a high-stakes game of Hollywood chicken. asserted
It → ’ → chicken
It appears Rob Bonta called David Ellison’s bluff this week when the CEO of Paramount Skydance reportedly back-channelled a threat to the California Attorney General’s office — and the Los Angeles Mayor’s office — that he’d officially announce Paramount’s move out of California, regardless of a settlement in the ongoing antitrust case. uncertain
he → appear → case
“Mayor Bass is taking [Paramount’s threat] seriously, Governor Newsom is taking it semi-seriously. asserted
Newsom → take → it
But Bonta believes he has a relatively strong anti-trust case,” said a knowledgeable source. asserted
source → believe → case
“And while Bonta would rather settle, he’s also willing to go to trial — and he also thinks that Ellison is acting a little crazy.” asserted
Ellison → settle → trial
On Wednesday, TMZ reported that Paramount notified Bonta and Bass that the studio was imminently announcing its intention to leave California. asserted
studio → report → California
But no announcement has, at least so far, been made. asserted
announcement → make → ?
(Paramount is not commenting.) asserted
Paramount → comment → ?
But TMZ then walked back its original story, saying talks were still ongoing. asserted
talks → walk → story
Making the move messier, a court-supervised settlement conference between the parties is already scheduled for October 14 and 15. asserted
conference → make → October
“David is used to getting his way and I think he’s so angry and frustrated right now that he could be saying, ‘I’m going to show them and I’m going to punish them because no one thinks I will do this,’” said a source. uncertain
source → use → this
Bonta’s office would not confirm or deny whether settlement talks are occurring. asserted
talks → confirm → ?
“It’s no secret that Paramount has been making this threat, despite its alleged commitment to California and Hollywood,” read a statement to P6H yesterday. asserted
statement → ’ → P6H
“What Paramount decides to do is Paramount’s choice alone. asserted
decides → decide → What
We’ll continue to apply the law without fear or favor and continue to be open to coming to the table for good faith discussions. asserted
We → continue → discussions
As the clock ticks down, one showbiz pro half-jokingly told us yesterday of the California quandary. asserted
pro → tick → quandary
“You know the perfect person who should be in power in this situation? asserted
who → know → situation
He’s the former governor, he’s a movie star. asserted
he → ’ → ?
It’s a dereliction of a lot of peoples’ duty [if] California can’t find a way for this to work. asserted
this → ’ → way
All bets are off for what comes next. asserted
what → come → ?
The adults at the table really need to step up.” asserted
adults → need → table
Bonta has indicated he’s open to talks, but said any resolution would require “robust structural remedies.” asserted
resolution → indicate → remedies
According to several sources, Bonta’s main conditions are keeping Paramount and Warners independent from one another for a period of time, and ensuring they are actually competitive. uncertain
they → accord → time
The other major condition is that Paramount and Warner Bros. cable assets would not merge. asserted
assets → merge → ?
Beyond the shockwaves created by TMZ’s bombshell report, top showbiz execs were unfazed by the news of Paramount’s alleged exodus. asserted
execs → create → exodus
“It’s all negotiations and positioning… meaningless,” huffed one veteran entertainment CEO. asserted
CEO → ’ → ?
Another showbiz vet said of Paramount’s latest threat: “Not going to happen. asserted
vet → say → threat
They’re about to go into settlement talks. asserted
They → ’re → talks
This has to be a BS thing for Bonta.” asserted
This → have → Bonta
Either way, Wednesday’s headlines pulled Bass further into the fray as the Paramount suit becomes a hot-button issue in LA’s mayoral race. asserted
suit → pull → race
Bass’ upcoming mayoral challenger, Nithya Raman, opposes the Paramount-WBD merger, and thinks the case should be decided in court. asserted
case → oppose → court
But Bass has called for a “swift and urgent resolution” to the dispute. asserted
Bass → call → dispute
One top political strategist told us of the political fallout from Paramount’s potential move: “If [Paramount] really was to leave, the repercussions are almost incalculable. asserted
repercussions → tell → move
The AG is not playing ball and is resistant. asserted
AG → play → ball
[Bass and Newsom] would like to see this all taken care of for all the obvious reasons. asserted
this → like → reasons
Who wants to lose a studio to another state? asserted
Who → want → state
It’s much bigger than that,” said the insider. asserted
insider → ’ → that
Local showbiz watchers have been wondering what happens to the famed Paramount lot if the studio leaves. asserted
studio → wonder → lot
“You know who’s gonna buy the lot? asserted
who → know → lot
OnlyFans,” a source joked, (we think?). asserted
we → joke → ?
…and 12 more, not listed.
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support