The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) found that an episode of the ABC's Four Corners program, titled Sacrifice and broadcast in March 2025, breached impartiality obligations by unduly favoring one perspective on the redevelopment of the Australian War Memorial. The ACMA criticized the program for not adequately explaining findings from an audit and potentially confusing viewers due to its presentation style. In response, ABC managing director Hugh Marks rejected the finding, warning that such interpretations could have a chilling effect on investigative journalism, which he argues serves the public interest by questioning officials and clarifying points of public importance.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-17,
using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the
same event (that is the story summary below).
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.45, but 1 quote(s) could not be found in the article and the other 1 are attributed speech rather than the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph
rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 15140: no verified evidence · logged 2026-09-17
The ABC boss has rejected an Australian media watchdog finding that the public broadcaster breached impartiality obligations in a Four Corners program about the redevelopment of the Australian War Memorial.
asserted
broadcaster → reject → Memorial
The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) said in a statement on Thursday it had found the program's March 2025 episode Sacrifice to have "unduly favoured one perspective".
asserted
Sacrifice → say → perspective
ABC managing director Hugh Marks has rejected those findings.
asserted
Marks → manage → findings
"If this interpretation of the Code is applied, including more widely across the industry, it could have a chilling effect on the body of investigative journalism that delivers the important stories that serve the public interest," he said in a statement.
uncertain
he → apply → statement
The regulator said it found the episode did not adequately explain the findings of an Australian National Audit Office audit, and conflated stages of the memorial's redevelopment, "which was likely to leave viewers confused".
asserted
which → say → viewers
ACMA chair Nerida O'Loughlin said while the regulator found the episode did not breach accuracy requirements, Four Corners was still required to comply with impartiality obligations under the ABC code of practice.
asserted
Corners → say → practice
"The ABC must present contentious issues with due impartiality and provide audiences with sufficient context," Ms O'Loughlin said.
"
asserted
O'Loughlin → present → context
We found that the cumulative effect of the program's framing, its use of strong and emotive language and its selection and differing treatment of interviewees unduly favoured critics of the redevelopment."
asserted
effect → find → redevelopment
In its formal response to the ACMA investigation on August 21, the ABC said the regulator's finding "misinterprets the policies governing ABC content, misrepresents the tone and tenor of the program and creates a standard and interpretation of impartiality that is unprecedented and unworkable".
asserted
that → say → impartiality
"It unfairly impugns the integrity of reporter Mark Willacy, one of Australia's most experienced and highly regarded journalists, and fails to acknowledge the efforts made by the program team to ensure impartiality," the response said.
asserted
response → impugn → impartiality
[The ACMA finding] could restrain journalists in questioning public officials, seeking explanations and clarifying points of public importance.
uncertain
finding → restrain → importance
"It could also impose false balance on investigative reporting.
uncertain
It → impose → reporting
Such an outcome would be contrary to the public interest in general and public interest journalism in particular."
The Sacrifice episode set out to examine concerns raised about the multi-million-dollar renovation and extension of the Australian War Memorial and to seek responses from the people responsible for the project, the ABC's response said.
asserted
response → set → project
"This is the essence of public interest and accountability journalism," the ABC said.
"
asserted
ABC → say → journalism
From the outset, and prior to any filming, Four Corners engaged with the AWM in good faith face-to-face meetings.
asserted
Corners → engage → meetings
"All issues that featured in the final story were put on the agenda at those meetings."
asserted
that → feature → meetings
The ABC says it "stands behind the team" that created the episode and told the ACMA it does not propose to remove it from the iview website.
asserted
it → say → website
The ABC's Ombudsman Office investigated the episode in March last year and found it did not breach the broadcaster's accuracy, impartiality or fair and honest dealing editorial standards.
asserted
it → investigate → standards
Ms O'Loughlin said it was "disappointing that the ABC chooses to regularly dispute the findings of the regulator".
asserted
ABC → say → regulator
In his statement, Mr Marks said the ABC "respects the important role the Australian Communications and Media Authority plays in guiding and regulating the broadcast media industry".
asserted
Authority → say → industry
"The ABC is committed to constructively engaging with ACMA and has overwhelmingly accepted its rulings and acted on them in the past," the statement said.
asserted
statement → commit → past
The last time the ABC rejected an ACMA finding was in 2022 after concerns were raised about the Four Corners episode, Fox and the Big Lie.
asserted
concerns → reject → episode
The latest ACMA finding marks the second time this year the regulator has decided a Four Corners program breached the ABC code of practice.
asserted
program → mark → practice
In March, the regulator published a separate finding that the 2023 Water Grab episode also breached accuracy and impartiality obligations.
asserted
episode → publish → obligations
The Aporia