Cheryl Grimmer's family 'deeply angry' as decision to drop case upheld

ABC News (AU) · collected 2026-09-17 · by Kelly Fuller
Read the original at ABC News (AU) ↗

Summary

Cheryl Grimmer's family is upset after the New South Wales director of public prosecutions upheld the decision to drop a case related to her disappearance in 1970. The family provided more than 50 detailed submissions but believes the review did not adequately address them, focusing instead on whether a legal ruling excluding admissions by a key suspect could be challenged. Ricki Nash, Cheryl’s brother, expressed deep disappointment and anger over the outcome, while director Sally Dowling offered to meet with the family to discuss further steps.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-17, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
32
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
6%
2 of 32 hedged
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Correction & hedging signals
60.2
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
1
Crime & Law
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-17 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

Cheryl Grimmer's family is deeply upset after the New South Wales director of public prosecutions (DPP) upheld the decision to abandon the case regarding her 1970 disappearance from Fairy Meadow Beach near Wollongong. Cheryl, three years old at the time, has never been found. The DPP reviewed a case against "Mercury," who had been charged but was exonerated when Justice Robert Hulme excluded admissions Mercury made as a teenager in 2019. Ricki Nash, Cheryl's brother, criticized the review for not adequately addressing more than fifty detailed submissions from the family. The DPP stated her review confirmed there were no reasonable grounds to challenge Justice Hulme’s ruling. While the family is considering meeting with the DPP, they are also urging police to investigate new evidence that may have emerged since the initial case collapse.

Written for “Cheryl Grimmer Case Decision” on 2026-09-17, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 14988 · logged 2026-09-17

Story

📰 Cheryl Grimmer Case Decision
Crime & Law · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.

Publisher

ABC News (AU) · 545 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)
2026-09-15
Canberra man posed as teenage girl to obtain child abuse material
2026-09-07
'Her career's finished': Fugitive Sydney developer's daughter avoids jail

Who wrote this

Kelly Fuller
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 She said she appreciated the determination would be very disappointing for the family and offered to meet with them to discuss the decision.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

DPP Mercury NSW Wollongong the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions

Subjects

Cheryl PERSON · 5× Mercury PERSON · 5× DPP ORG · 4× Cheryl Grimmer's PERSON · 2× Nash PERSON · 2× NSW GPE · 1× ODPP ORG · 1× Ricki Nash PERSON · 1× Wollongong GPE · 1× the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions ORG · 1×

Narrative

"After careful consideration I have concluded that it is not, and that therefore the original decision to take no further proceedings following that ruling was correct." She told the family her review led her to conclude 'there are not reasonable prospects of succeeding in a challenge to the trial judge's determination" on Mercury's admissions.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-17
🔮 She said she appreciated the determination would be very disappointing for the family and offered to meet with them to discuss the decision.
2026-09-17 · ABC News (AU)
Cheryl Grimmer's family 'deeply angry' as decision to drop case upheld · assertive framing

Claims (32 extracted, 2 hedged)

In short: Cheryl Grimmer's family is devastated after the DPP upheld the decision to abandon the case over her 1970 disappearance. asserted
DPP → devastate → disappearance
The family says the review failed to adequately address more than 50 detailed submissions What's next? The family are considering an offer to meet with the DPP and urging police to follow alleged new evidence. asserted
family → say → evidence
Cheryl Grimmer's family says it is devastated after the NSW director of public prosecutions upheld the decision to abandon the case over the three-year-old's disappearance. asserted
director → say → disappearance
Cheryl disappeared from Fairy Meadow Beach near Wollongong on January 12, 1970. asserted
Cheryl → disappear → January
Her body has never been recovered. asserted
body → recover → ?
Her brother, Ricki Nash, has strongly criticised the outcome of a formal request under the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP) Victims' Right Of Review Policy. asserted
brother → criticise → Policy
"I am utterly disgusted, devastated and deeply angry at what our family has received,"he said. asserted
family → devastate → what
The review examined the decision to discontinue proceedings against a man known by the pseudonym "Mercury", who had been charged over Cheryl's disappearance. asserted
who → examine → disappearance
The prosecution collapsed in 2019 after the NSW Supreme Court excluded admissions Mercury made to police when he was 17. asserted
he → collapse → police
Justice Robert Hulme found the interview did not meet legal requirements applying to admissions made by children, including safeguards concerning the presence of an adult. asserted
interview → find → adult
DPP finds ruling cannot be challenged asserted
ruling → find → ?
In a two-page letter emailed to the family on September 16, director of public prosecutions Sally Dowling SC acknowledged the impact of the original decision and their patience while the review was conducted. asserted
review → email → decision
Ms Dowling said she had reviewed the case "afresh to determine if the decision not to proceed further was correct". asserted
decision → say → case
"As you appreciate, this question turns on whether the exclusion of the recorded interview with Mercury by the trial judge is reasonably open to challenge. asserted
exclusion → appreciate → challenge
"After careful consideration I have concluded that it is not, and that therefore the original decision to take no further proceedings following that ruling was correct." She told the family her review led her to conclude 'there are not reasonable prospects of succeeding in a challenge to the trial judge's determination" on Mercury's admissions. asserted
review → conclude → admissions
She said she appreciated the determination would be very disappointing for the family and offered to meet with them to discuss the decision. asserted
determination → say → decision
Mr Nash said the family had provided 50 detailed submissions, setting out extensive evidence and legal arguments. asserted
family → say → evidence
"We have received an extraordinarily brief determination. asserted
We → receive → determination
To describe the findings as disappointing is an understatement." asserted
describe → describe → findings
Mr Nash said the repose provided little detail explaining how those matters were actually dealt with. asserted
matters → say → detail
The family believed the review focused on whether the original ruling could be challenged, rather than fully reconsidering and responding to the issues it raised. uncertain
it → believe → issues
"That distinction matters enormously to us. asserted
distinction → matter → us
There is also something else that cannot be ignored." asserted
that → be → ?
Serious admissions excluded from case He said Mercury's admissions contained details about Cheryl and her disappearance that raised questions about how he could have known them. uncertain
he → exclude → them
The fact that such extraordinary admissions were made is precisely why our family believes the circumstances surrounding them deserved the most rigorous examination possible." asserted
circumstances → make → examination
He said the family did not expect the DPP to automatically agree with them, but did expect an application under the Victims' Right of Review Policy to provide "meaningful scrutiny". asserted
application → say → scrutiny
"Our family is devastated and angry, but we are not going to stop asking questions. " asserted
we → devastate → questions
We owe that to Cheryl. asserted
We → owe → Cheryl
Cheryl deserves better." asserted
Cheryl → deserve → ?
The review is separate from the family's request for NSW Police to assess what it describes as significant new evidence that emerged after the prosecution ended. asserted
prosecution → assess → evidence
That material includes accounts from potential witnesses who came forward following renewed publicity generated by BBC reporter Jon Kay's podcast, Fairy Meadow. asserted
who → include → podcast
The ABC has contacted the ODPP for comment. asserted
ABC → contact → comment
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support