John Robson: The New York Times’ shameless celebration of debauchery

Read the original at National Post ↗
Cite

Robson, J. (2026, August 20). John Robson: The New York Times’ shameless celebration of debauchery. National Post. https://nationalpost.com/opinion/john-robson-the-new-york-times-shameless-celebration-of-debauchery

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

National Post · collected 2026-08-20 · by John Robson analysis

Quick Summary

Columnist John Robson criticizes The New York Times for promoting a lifestyle of debauchery in one of its articles. According to Robson, the article profiles a Canadian woman who caters to the ultrarich and features her hosting an extravagant party with champagne-spraying models. The article's tone is seen as celebratory and approving of excess, which Robson argues is contradictory to the Times' self-image as a reputable and progressive publication.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-08-20, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

John Robson, a columnist, is criticizing The New York Times for promoting debauchery and conspicuous consumption in its content. He claims that the paper's approach to journalism is to "execute" stories without judgment, allowing readers to indulge in luxury lifestyles. The article mentions an example of how The New York Times marketed a moisturizer to Robson, suggesting he needed different products for each season, implying that he has a high-end lifestyle. Robson expresses frustration with the assumption and states that he is not wealthy or interested in such luxuries. He also criticizes another article featuring a Canadian woman who caters to ultrarich clients, implying that The New York Times is pandering to this demographic.

Written for “The New York Times and Debauchery” on 2026-10-16, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 The New York Times and Debauchery
Entertainment · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
37
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
11%
4 of 37 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
60/100
National Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Entertainment
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-08-20 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

National Post · 933 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)

Who wrote this

John Robson
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 If markets worked as Adam Smith or Ronald Reagan thought, the last thing anyone would want or need is government advertising investment opportunities.
🔮 It is evident that many people live in ways I could not emulate and do not wish to.
Also by John Robson
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Canadian Dom Pérignon New York Times Times the New York Times

Subjects

Times ORG · 4× Caligula PERSON · 1× Canadian NORP · 1× Cato the Elder PERSON · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× J. Budziszewski PERSON · 1× New York Times ORG · 1× Paris GPE · 1× the New York Times ORG · 1×

Narrative

If you’re wondering how the rich can roll about in cash and wasted luxury foodstuffs cackling in ways Marie Antoinette would have found disquieting while Times readers savour the frisson, consider that one of this panderer-to-conspicuous-consumption’s working mottos is, “Our job is to execute, not judge.”
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-08-20
🔮 It is evident that many people live in ways I could not emulate and do not wish to.
2026-08-20 · National Post
John Robson: The New York Times’ shameless celebration of debauchery · assertive framing

Claims (37 extracted, 4 hedged)

My arguably obsessive files on the state of the world, a.k.a the mess we are in, include one labelled “You Have Mistaken Me For Someone Else,” as a repository for offers to curate this, moisturize that, and improve my “email deliverability.” asserted
You → include → deliverability
It is evident that many people live in ways I could not emulate and do not wish to. uncertain
I → live → ways
And also that marketers have surprising trouble telling me from our libertine liberal elite. asserted
marketers → have → elite
For instance the moisturizer from the New York Times “Wirecutter,” a sometimes-useful guide to “lifestyle hacks” if I had a lifestyle or were into hacks. asserted
I → have → hacks
Instead they lost me at hello, a.k.a. “Do you need a different moisturizer for each season?” to which my response was “No, the tap works year round.” asserted
tap → lose → which
But evidently they had something different in mind. asserted
they → have → mind
I won’t dwell on the demoralizing offer to “Improve Your Chess Rating” that arrived right after achieving my lifetime peak. asserted
that → dwell → peak
But hot off the presses here’s another Times item, Canadian-girl-makes-good, where “She Makes the Impossible Happen for Her Ultrarich Clients.” asserted
Impossible → ’ → Clients
To mistake me for the ultrarich would take some doing. asserted
mistake → mistake → doing
But it’s also weird that they thought I’d get a vicarious thrill from this debauchery. asserted
I → ’ → debauchery
If you get the joke about the preacher who read the Bible and the Times every day to know what both sides were thinking, you’re aware that the “Grey Lady” is the sober, reputable voice of wacky woke liberalism. asserted
Lady → get → liberalism
It favours DEI, loathes Donald Trump, and wants higher taxes, Net Zero, income redistribution, an anti-fun nanny state and blah blah blah progressive orthodoxy. asserted
It → favour → taxes
Yet it also celebrates grotesque displays of hedonism among those whose rank and wealth bring privileges. asserted
rank → celebrate → privileges
And it’s no coincidence. asserted
it → ’ → ?
I won’t wallow in the horrifying details. asserted
I → wallow → details
You have the Interwebs on your computer, your phone and possibly also your watch and can read it for yourself if you find high-flyers with pointless lives and huge bank accounts bathing in champagne alluring. uncertain
flyers → have → champagne
As many people apparently do, since the influencer or whatever she is in question has some two million followers online and a contract for a “scripted series” to somehow push her over-the-top existence over another top or something. asserted
she → do → top
Suffice it to say that one featured event she created, or possibly curated, for a client evidently determined to prove money can’t buy class, involved spending six figures just on Dom Pérignon sprayed on party-goers by … um … sexy young women in revealing outfits. uncertain
money → suffice → outfits
Not exactly Woke 1.0, is it? asserted
it → wake → 1.0
As philosopher J. Budziszewski observes, people disinclined to obey natural law are inclined to deny its existence. asserted
people → observe → existence
The piece calls it “pointless excess” with apparent glee, revelling in the final cost of all this wasted high-tone booze, including “artisanal” tequila, being “$226,000 and change” and quoting the facilitator of this sinful display that “Honestly, (the client) would have spent more. asserted
client → call → more
But he got hit hard at the casino the night before. asserted
he → hit → casino
Not hard enough, I say. asserted
I → say → ?
(Cue the opening scene of Diamonds are Forever.) asserted
Diamonds → cue → scene
But the Times, and the entrepreneur, know their audience: nearly 3,000 people “paid anywhere from $1,500 to $25,000 for a table at the outdoor club” without even knowing the host. asserted
people → know → host
“But that hardly mattered. asserted
that → matter → ?
What the glossy strangers provided was an appropriately uproarious backdrop when the inevitable reels of the blowout would stream on social media. asserted
reels → provide → media
So there was a point, hidden in plain sight: obscene excess that would have had Caligula talking like Cato the Elder. asserted
Caligula → be → Cato
But surely the Times too should declare censoriously that the money could have been better spent on the homeless, the carbon footprint was the size of the Chicxulub crater and as ominous that Narcissism inhibits compassion and so on. uncertain
Narcissism → declare → compassion
Instead the piece is celebratory to the point of parody, chortling that our heroine “has flown to Paris to retrieve the largest croissant in that city to please the daughter of a Miami billionaire.” asserted
heroine → chortle → billionaire
“Luxury Beliefs Go Wild” for your private public pleasure. asserted
Beliefs → go → pleasure
If you’re wondering how the rich can roll about in cash and wasted luxury foodstuffs cackling in ways Marie Antoinette would have found disquieting while Times readers savour the frisson, consider that one of this panderer-to-conspicuous-consumption’s working mottos is, “Our job is to execute, not judge.” asserted
job → wonder → consumption
Non-judgementality gives you licence to bask in privileged excess while flaunting your social conscience. asserted
judgementality → give → conscience
If you care to. asserted
you → care → ?
Yet again, they appear to have mistaken me for someone else. asserted
they → appear → someone
I’d be out back hosing off the tequila with municipal moisturizer muttering “O Tempora O Mores.” asserted
I → hose → Mores
But with a client list who “must fork over an annual fee of $100,000 and agree to book $1 million in yearly travel,” the mere planning of which would kill me, I don’t suppose they care. asserted
they → fork → me
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support