Photo via Evening Standard

Simon Cowell ‘feared David Walliams was not a good person’ as his reaction to sex claims ‘revealed’

Read the original at Evening Standard ↗
Cite

Karasin, E. (2026, November 12). Simon Cowell ‘feared David Walliams was not a good person’ as his reaction to sex claims ‘revealed’. Evening Standard. https://www.standard.co.uk/showbiz/simon-cowell-david-walliams-bgt-claims-b1304571.html

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Evening Standard · collected 2026-11-12 · by Ekin Karasin

Quick Summary

Simon Cowell expressed concerns about David Walliams's character after allegations surfaced that Walliams used his position on "Britain’s Got Talent" to make unwanted advances towards young female fans. These claims include an employee witnessing very young women in Walliams’ dressing room while he was partially clothed, and another woman alleging a sexual relationship began when she was 15 years old. Cowell distanced himself from Walliams four years ago after the entertainer left the show following inappropriate comments about contestants, though he noted that Walliams had been respectful towards most contestants during his time on the program.
Written by AI on 2026-11-12, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).
See how they differ ↓

AI analysis

Story summary

David Walliams, a judge on Britain's Got Talent (BGT), has been accused of engaging in inappropriate and exploitative sexual activities with young women and girls, dating back to 2003. This led to Simon Cowell, the show's creator, distancing himself from Walliams four years ago, reportedly due to concerns that Walliams was "not a good person." Walliams left BGT in 2022 after being recorded making disparaging remarks about contestants, including calling one a derogatory term and describing another as a "slightly boring girl." An investigation by The Guardian and ITV News revealed allegations of Walliams using his position as a BGT judge to privately contact young female fans and make unwanted advances. Cowell has not spoken to Walliams since his departure and stated he is pleased the show has moved on without him.

Written for “David Walliams Accused of Sexual Misconduct” on 2026-11-13, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.

How they differ

2 outlets covered “David Walliams Accused of Sexual Misconduct”.

What each outlet says

One AI summary per outlet of its latest article on this story, written from that article alone and checked against it. Open the article for the outlet's own words.

Evening StandardThis outlet12 Nov

Simon Cowell expressed concerns about David Walliams's character after allegations surfaced that Walliams used his position on "Britain’s Got Talent" to make unwanted advances towards young female fans. These claims include an employee witnessing very young women in Walliams’ dressing room while he was partially clothed, and another woman alleging a sexual relationship began when she was 15 years old. Cowell…

Simon Cowell ‘feared David Walliams was not a good person’ as his reaction to sex claims ‘revealed’ (this article)
Daily Mail12 Nov

The article discusses controversial interactions between Britain's Got Talent judge David Walliams and producer Simon Cowell during the show’s earlier seasons. It highlights specific instances where Walliams allegedly made Cowell feel uncomfortable, including an incident in 2018 when Cowell called Walliams a "psychopathic child" and another moment when Walliams pulled down his trousers on air. The piece also…

David Walliams' most disturbing BGT moments with Simon Cowell where he 'crossed the line' and left him feeling 'VERY uncomfortable' - as axed judge is accused of sexual misconduct →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 4% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Evening Standard
Hedges 1 of 23 claims Outlet record 64/100
“While both articles discuss sexual misconduct allegations against David Walliams, Article B focuses on Simon Cowell's reaction and suspicions about Walliams, rather than the specific allegations and calls for safeguarding mentioned in Article A.”
Evening Standard
Hedges 1 of 27 claims Outlet record 64/100
“While both articles discuss sexual misconduct allegations against David Walliams, Article A focuses on the initial reporting and denial of the allegations, while Article B discusses Simon Cowell's reaction to the allegations four years after Walliams' departure from Britain's Got Talent.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 5 of 42 claims Outlet record 70/100
“Article A describes a specific incident involving David Walliams and an 18-year-old fan at BGT studios, while Article B discusses Simon Cowell's reaction to and perception of Walliams regarding recent sexual misconduct allegations. These are different but related events.”
Evening Standard
Hedges 1 of 21 claims Outlet record 64/100
“While both articles discuss sexual misconduct allegations against David Walliams, Article A focuses on the publication of the allegations and their impact, while Article B focuses on Simon Cowell's reaction to the allegations and the context of Walliams' relationship with Cowell prior to the allegations.”
The Guardian
Hedges 0 of 14 claims Outlet record 65/100
“While both articles discuss sexual misconduct allegations against David Walliams, Article A focuses on Walliams' denial and his letter to journalists, whereas Article B centers on Simon Cowell's reaction and distancing himself from Walliams due to suspicions from four years ago.”
Evening Standard
Hedges 1 of 55 claims Outlet record 64/100
“While both articles discuss sexual misconduct allegations against David Walliams, Article A focuses on the specific accusations and Walliams' denial, while Article B discusses Simon Cowell's reaction and distancing from Walliams after the allegations surfaced, covering different aspects of the same broader issue.”
Evening Standard
Hedges 1 of 28 claims Outlet record 64/100
“While both articles discuss allegations against David Walliams, Article B focuses on Simon Cowell's reaction and distancing from Walliams due to suspicions, rather than reporting the specific allegations or Walliams' denial from Article A.”
BBC News
Leans left Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses the allegations against David Walliams and his legal battle to block their publication, while Article B focuses on Simon Cowell's reaction to the allegations and his previous concerns about Walliams.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 6 of 38 claims Outlet record 70/100
“Article A discusses the investigation into David Walliams' conduct six years ago, while Article B focuses on Simon Cowell's reaction to recent allegations and his distancing from Walliams four years ago.”

Story

David Walliams Accused of Sexual Misconduct
Entertainment · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↑
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
27
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
4%
1 of 27 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
64/100
Evening Standard's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Entertainment
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-12 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Evening Standard · 9850 article(s) · 75 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 75 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Ekin Karasin
93 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
This is not something that I would ever condone.”
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
"We did both regret the furore that we caused, and also the hurt it may have caused Mr Sachs and his family."
During the interview, Brand said he thought about shaking her hand instead of a hug when they were introduced so that she wouldn’t, “at any point think, 'I could destroy him with my sexual charisma.’”
"We did both regret the furore that we caused, and also the hurt it may have caused Mr Sachs and his family."
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
Russell Brand victims treated in 'shocking and depressing way' in court, says Labour minister Brand’s defence barrister Ian Winter KC has faced backlash for claiming the rape should only be “regarded as a man who went too far” and that the victims were “not particularly vulnerable at all”. Winter also argued that Brand’s crimes were due to his level of fame at the time and said he could not be a rapist as his accusers had not “resisted or screamed or even tried to leave”.
The comedian posted the video to his X account on Monday - an hour after Brand was sentenced to prison - to plug dates for his new show, Killing Jokes, which is set to tour across the UK and US in 2027.
Perry was reportedly waiting for the outcome of his trial but has been in “active discussions” with producers about a possible show and is set to finalise a deal, sources claimed.
In video footage circulating online, furious Foxx yelled: "Why would you do something like that?
Also by Ekin Karasin
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 93 articles by Ekin Karasin →

Topics

BGT Guardian ITV News Standard The Mail

Subjects

Walliams PERSON · 12× BGT ORG · 5× Cowell PERSON · 3× David PERSON · 2× David Walliams PERSON · 1× Guardian ORG · 1× Simon PERSON · 1× Simon Cowell PERSON · 1× Standard ORG · 1× The Mail ORG · 1×

Narrative

The injunction bid was dismissed and, after Walliams failed to appeal, he was named in the three-year Guardian and ITV News investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct dating back to 2003.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-12
This is not something that I would ever condone.”

Claims (27 extracted, 1 hedged)

Simon Cowell ‘feared David Walliams was not a good person’ as his reaction to sex claims ‘revealed’ uncertain
reaction → fear → claims
One women alleged that Walliams used his position as a BGT judge to contact young female fans privately, invite them to his dressing room or home and make unwanted advances. asserted
Walliams → allege → advances
An employee said he saw very young female guests in Walliams’ dressing room while he was wearing only a towel. asserted
he → say → towel
Cowell seemingly distanced himself from Walliams four years ago after his BGT exit, with sources telling The Mail that he had harboured suspicions about the entertainer. asserted
he → distance → entertainer
As for the current allegations, an insider said: “Simon hasn’t had anything to do with David for a long time now and he won’t ever again. asserted
he → say → time
“He is pleased that David went from BGT and that it has now moved on without him.” asserted
it → go → him
The Standard has contacted Cowell’s representative for comment. asserted
Standard → contact → comment
Walliams left BGT after he was caught making sexual remarks about a female contestant and describing an elderly contestant as a “c***”. asserted
he → leave → *
Cowell later said that Walliams was “very respectful and emotional” about other contestants for much of his time on BGT. asserted
Walliams → say → BGT
But he continued: “We had a conversation. asserted
We → continue → conversation
But you know, he owned what he said, he wasn't proud of what he said. asserted
he → know → what
This is not something that I would ever condone.” asserted
I → condone → that
He added that, while he is an executive producer on the show, he wasn’t “really involved” in the decision for Walliams to leave, saying two other producers were “more hands on”. asserted
producers → add → decision
Read More Earlier this week, multiple women came forward with allegations about Walliams. asserted
women → read → Walliams
Walliams said in a statement: “Looking back, I realise that at times I behaved thoughtlessly towards other people I had casual sexual relationships with. asserted
I → say → relationships
“I realise I did not always take people’s feelings properly into account. asserted
I → realise → account
That is something I regret. asserted
I → regret → ?
And whilst a power imbalance is inevitable when one party is famous, abusing that power is something else entirely and it is something that I never did.” asserted
I → abuse → that
He added: “I am not a sexual predator. asserted
I → add → ?
I have not broken the law, but I am devastated that some of the women I met 10 to 20 years ago have now expressed hurt or anger towards me.” asserted
I → break → me
The injunction bid was dismissed and, after Walliams failed to appeal, he was named in the three-year Guardian and ITV News investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct dating back to 2003. asserted
he → dismiss → 2003
One woman alleged Walliams began contacting her, then 15, after meeting her at a Little Britain fan event, before starting a sexual relationship with her at the age of 17. asserted
Walliams → allege → 17
Another said she was 18 when the then 31-year-old Walliams first contacted her in 2003. asserted
Walliams → say → 2003
She told the investigation: “He groomed me as a young adult, I was vulnerable. asserted
I → tell → adult
He made me feel special, plying me with gifts. asserted
me → make → gifts
Then disregarding me when he didn’t get what he wanted.” asserted
he → disregard → what
Walliams is also accused of inappropriate conduct and sexual harassment at Britain’s Got Talent and at the publisher, HarperCollins. asserted
Walliams → accuse → publisher
Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

History Support