Photo via Just The News

Democrats did it for Biden. Now Trump wants the same lame-duck judicial blitz

Read the original at Just The News ↗
Cite

Head, A. (2026, November 11). Democrats did it for Biden. Now Trump wants the same lame-duck judicial blitz. Just The News. https://justthenews.com/government/white-house/democrats-did-it-biden-now-trump-wants-same-lame-duck-judicial-blitz?utm_source=justthenews.com&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=external-news-aggregators

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Just The News · collected 2026-11-12 · by Amanda Head

Quick Summary

President Trump is urging Republicans to speed up the confirmation process for his remaining 161 judicial nominations before Democrats take control of Congress in January. This move mirrors what Democrats did for Joe Biden's nominees two years ago when they controlled the Senate near the end of Obama’s term. Current Majority Leader John Thune has agreed with the GOP conference to maximize their time, but Democrats like Chuck Schumer are already signaling resistance, stating they will not confirm "crappy nominees."
Written by AI on 2026-11-12, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).
See how they differ ↓

AI analysis

Story summary

President Donald Trump is urging the Republican-led Senate to confirm his 161 outstanding nominees, including 25 federal judges, before the end of the year. Democrats won control of both chambers of Congress last week, flipping the Senate after winning seven seats with two races still undecided in Alaska and Mississippi. Trump made the request in a Truth Social post, emphasizing the importance of confirming the nominees before the Democrats take over in January. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has vowed to block any conservative-leaning Supreme Court justice nominee if a vacancy occurs under Trump's presidency. Senate Republicans are considering a resolution to maximize their remaining 54 days in power before the Democrats take control, with the Judiciary Committee already advancing four of Trump's District Court candidates and holding confirmation hearings for four others.

Written for “Trump Pushes For Judicial Confirmations” on 2026-11-13, grounded in this article and the 2 other(s) covering the same event.

How they differ

2 outlets covered “Trump Pushes For Judicial Confirmations”.

What each outlet says

One AI summary per outlet of its latest article on this story, written from that article alone and checked against it. Open the article for the outlet's own words.

Just the NewsThis outlet12 Nov

President Trump is urging Republicans to speed up the confirmation process for his remaining 161 judicial nominations before Democrats take control of Congress in January. This move mirrors what Democrats did for Joe Biden's nominees two years ago when they controlled the Senate near the end of Obama’s term. Current Majority Leader John Thune has agreed with the GOP conference to maximize their time, but Democrats…

Democrats did it for Biden. Now Trump wants the same lame-duck judicial blitz (this article)2 articles from Just the News on this story
Washington Examiner10 Nov

President Donald Trump is urging the Senate to confirm 25 pending federal judge nominees before Republicans lose their majority in January. This push faces resistance from Arkansas’s senators over one particular nominee, which if confirmed would give Trump appointees a majority on a federal appeals court for the first time. Trump emphasized this priority by posting about it on Truth Social.

Trump calls on Senate to confirm remaining 25 judges amid Arkansas senator friction →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 22% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Just The News
Hedges 0 of 11 claims Outlet record 94/100
Fox News
Hedges 6 of 21 claims Outlet record 67/100
“The articles discuss related strategies and outcomes regarding judicial confirmations but describe different timeframes and contexts: one focuses on consequences after a Democratic Senate takeover, while the other discusses Trump's current efforts to rush through judicial appointments before that happens.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 68/100
CBS News
Leans left Hedges 6 of 43 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss different timeframes and outcomes: Article A refers to potential future confirmations before Democrats take control, while Article B discusses past successes and current status of Trump's judicial appointments.”
Washington Examiner
Leans left Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss similar political strategies regarding judicial appointments but refer to different times and contexts - one focuses on current holdouts complicating Trump's efforts, while the other discusses a potential upcoming blitz of confirmations before Democrats take control.”

Story

Trump Pushes For Judicial Confirmations
Politics · 3 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↑
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
32
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
22%
7 of 32 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
94/100
Just The News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
3
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-12 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Just The News · 405 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Amanda Head
5 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
Now Trump wants the same lame-duck judicial blitz With fewer than 60 days remaining until Democrats take control of Congress, outstanding judicial appointments may be treated to a blitz of confirmations.
Leavitt's successor didn't last a week On Aug. 12, Trump announced Leavitt would leave at month's end to spend more time with her young children.
Tuesday's GOP carnage is undeniable, but there are a few holes in the storm cloud cover that could offer some solace for the party.
Tuesday's GOP carnage is undeniable, but there are a few holes in the storm cloud cover that could offer some solace for the party.
Tuesday's GOP carnage is undeniable, but there are a few holes in the storm cloud cover that could offer some solace for the party.
Also by Amanda Head
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Congress Democrats Republicans Senate the US Senate

Subjects

Senate ORG · 10× Trump PERSON · 10× Democrats NORP · 9× Biden PERSON · 6× Republicans NORP · 4× CBS News ORG · 2× The Associated Press ORG · 2× Thune PERSON · 2× Congress ORG · 1× Joe Biden's PERSON · 1×

Narrative

What comes next The Judiciary Committee already voted to advance four of the president's U.S. District Court candidates and held confirmation hearings for four other judicial nominees Tuesday, and it is expected to hold more hearings next week, breaking from its usual every-other-week schedule.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-12
Now Trump wants the same lame-duck judicial blitz With fewer than 60 days remaining until Democrats take control of Congress, outstanding judicial appointments may be treated to a blitz of confirmations.

Claims (32 extracted, 7 hedged)

Democrats did it for Biden. asserted
Democrats → do → Biden
Now Trump wants the same lame-duck judicial blitz With fewer than 60 days remaining until Democrats take control of Congress, outstanding judicial appointments may be treated to a blitz of confirmations. uncertain
appointments → want → confirmations
Two years after Democrats raced to confirm Joe Biden's judges before losing the Senate, President Donald Trump is pressing Republicans to run the same play before Democrats take the gavel in January. asserted
Democrats → race → January
The president made the stakes plain in a recent social media post, saying: "Very important for the US Senate to confirm all of our pending 161 Nominations, including 25 Federal Judges. asserted
Senate → make → Judges
Senate Republicans appear to be listening. asserted
Republicans → appear → ?
Current Majority Leader John Thune, R- S.D., and the GOP conference agreed on a resolution to maximize their remaining 54 days in power. asserted
Thune → agree → power
As of Wednesday, 24 of Trump's judicial nominations were pending in the Senate, according to Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley's Judiciary Committee, which says it has moved at the fastest pace since the Reagan administration uncertain
it → pende → administration
Democrats, meanwhile, are signaling they intend to slam the window shut. asserted
they → signal → window
Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., the current Senate Minority Leader, told The Associated Press that Democrats will not fill the bench with "crappy nominees." asserted
Democrats → tell → nominees
How Trump's record stacks up against modern presidents Trump's first-term record remains one of the most judicially consequential in modern history. asserted
record → stack → history
His first-term total of 234 judges trails Barack Obama's 329 and George W. Bush's 340 judges successfully nominated and confirmed to the federal bench, but both of those presidents had eight years to reach their numbers, and Trump did it in four. asserted
Trump → trail → four
That first-term haul included 54 judges on the 13 federal appellate courts, one step below the Supreme Court, along with three high court justices. asserted
haul → include → justices
Joe Biden edged past that mark only at the very end of his term. asserted
Biden → edge → term
The Senate confirmed his 235th judicial nominee, surpassing the record of 234 confirmed during Trump's first term, according to The Hill. uncertain
Senate → confirm → Hill
In his second term, the Senate has confirmed 57 Trump judges, including 10 appeals court judges, 46 district judges and one member of the Court of International Trade. asserted
Senate → confirm → Trade
That pace is slower, partly because Trump has had comparatively few vacancies to fill in his second term, according to a Pew Research analysis. uncertain
Trump → have → analysis
Even so, Trump nominees make up about one-third of active federal judges, CBS News reported. asserted
News → make → judges
Both parties have run this play before The lame-duck judicial sprint is hardly a Trump invention. asserted
sprint → run → play
Two years ago, Democrats did the same thing for Biden. asserted
Democrats → do → Biden
As Senate Democrats worked to push through Biden's remaining nominees before he left office and control of the chamber flipped, then-Minority Whip Thune pushed back. asserted
Thune → work → chamber
"If Sen. Schumer thought Senate Republicans would just roll over and allow him to quickly confirm multiple Biden-appointed judges to lifetime jobs in the final weeks of the Democrat majority, he thought wrong," Thune said at the time, according to CBS News. uncertain
Thune → think → News
The parties eventually struck a deal. asserted
parties → strike → deal
An agreement between Senate Republicans and Democrats gave Biden the chance to outdo Trump's 234 confirmations, a race Biden ultimately won by a single judge, the Associated Press reported. asserted
Press → give → judge
Republican allies outside Washington are now demanding the same urgency. asserted
allies → demand → urgency
"Every single federal judicial vacancy needs to be filled in the lame duck session," Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis posted on X. "The Senate should pull all-nighters for as long as it takes. asserted
it → need → nighters
What comes next The Judiciary Committee already voted to advance four of the president's U.S. District Court candidates and held confirmation hearings for four other judicial nominees Tuesday, and it is expected to hold more hearings next week, breaking from its usual every-other-week schedule. asserted
it → come → schedule
There are currently 28 vacancies on the federal courts and another 15 seats that will open in the coming weeks and months. asserted
that → be → weeks
The confirmations also have to compete for floor time with a crowded year-end agenda. asserted
confirmations → have → agenda
Other high-priority items punted to the lame duck body include the National Defense Authorization Act, a bipartisan permitting reform package and keeping the government funded. asserted
government → punt → Act
Whatever the Senate finishes by January could be the last word for a while. uncertain
finishes → finish → while
Once Democrats take control, Trump could struggle to secure another judicial confirmation. uncertain
Trump → take → confirmation
You can follow her here. asserted
You → follow → her
Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

History Support