Photo via The Guardian

It’s impeachment season! After the attempt on Pete Hegseth, will Donald Trump be next? | Arwa Mahdawi

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Mahdawi, A. (2026, November 11). It’s impeachment season! After the attempt on Pete Hegseth, will Donald Trump be next? | Arwa Mahdawi. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/nov/11/impeachment-pete-hegseth-donald-trump

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-11-11 · by Arwa Mahdawi

Quick Summary

Arwa Mahdawi discusses the current political climate in the US, noting that Republicans are feeling anxious as impeachment talk resurfaces following recent attempts to impeach Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. The article highlights Donald Trump's concern about potential impeachment proceedings given his party’s poor performance in the midterms and his repeated warnings that losing control of Congress could lead to such actions against him. Mahdawi explains the process of impeachment, noting that while Trump has been impeached twice before, he was never removed from office due to Senate acquittals. Despite Democrats now controlling government bodies, Mahdawi argues that actual impeachment remains unlikely because of procedural difficulties and a lack of political will among Democratic leaders like Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders who prioritize other legislative goals over pursuing Trump's removal.
Written by AI on 2026-11-11, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of November 11, 2026, Republicans are facing the prospect of impeachment after a failed attempt to impeach Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. President Donald Trump warned Republicans that failing to win the midterm elections would lead to his own impeachment. Despite losing the midterms in a significant defeat, Trump has shifted focus to other issues but remains concerned about potential impeachment proceedings against him. Kamala Harris stated recently that pursuing impeachment is not a good idea due to limited resources and suggests focusing on accountability and investigations instead. The impeachment pressure is intensifying as Republicans feel nervous about their political future following the election results.

Written for “Impeachment Threats Loom” on 2026-11-11, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans left (beta estimate) Confidence medium 1 quote(s) discarded as not found in the article
Leaning: leans left for article 145444 (medium confidence, 4 verified quotes) · logged 2026-11-11

Story

Impeachment Threats Loom
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 19% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss impeachment efforts against Pete Hegseth and potential future threats to Donald Trump, but they describe different stages or contexts of political events rather than a single specific incident.”
CBS News
Leans left Hedges 3 of 35 claims Outlet record 68/100
“Article A discusses the potential impeachment vote for Pete Hegseth this week, while Article B mentions that an attempt to impeach Hegseth failed the day before and shifts focus towards speculation about Donald Trump's future.”
TIME
Hedges 2 of 39 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A reports on Trump's defense of Pete Hegseth as a Republican-led impeachment effort looms, while Article B discusses potential future impeachment risks for Trump after attempts to impeach others have failed.”
The Guardian
Hedges 3 of 44 claims Outlet record 65/100
“While both articles mention the impeachment effort against Pete Hegseth, Article B is more about broader implications and potential future actions rather than the specific failed attempt described in Article A.”
Impeach Pete Hegseth Different event
Reason
Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 1 of 47 claims Outlet record 67/100
“Article A discusses Rep. Massie's planned impeachment resolution against Pete Hegseth and potential actions by Democrats after winning control of Congress, while Article B mentions an attempt to impeach Hegseth that failed the previous day.”
The Independent
Hedges 4 of 47 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A discusses the expected vote on Pete Hegseth's impeachment as Congress reconvenes, while Article B talks about the aftermath of the failed attempt to impeach Hegseth and mentions potential future threats against Donald Trump.”
The Bulwark
Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 11 of 88 claims
“The articles discuss impeachment attempts against Pete Hegseth but describe different aspects and stages of events occurring at separate times.”
Global News
Leans left Hedges 5 of 42 claims Outlet record 63/100
“Article A describes Rep. Thomas Massie's introduction of impeachment articles against Pete Hegseth on a specific date, while Article B discusses the broader context and outcome of an attempt to impeach Hegseth, indicating that it failed.”
Euronews
Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A reports on Republican Representative Thomas Massie's push to impeach Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth for alleged constitutional violations, while Article B discusses broader impeachment concerns targeting both Hegseth and Donald Trump. The specific event described in Article A is focused solely on the effort to impeach Hegseth, not Trump.”
Reason
Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 3 of 11 claims Outlet record 67/100
“Article A covers the immediate voting and aftermath of blocking Pete Hegseth's impeachment, while Article B discusses a broader context including potential future impeachments involving Donald Trump.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
36
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
19%
7 of 36 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
65/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-11 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 2314 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Arwa Mahdawi
19 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
While the attempt to impeach the defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, failed yesterday, Donald Trump may be worried he’s next.
His hardline deportation policy might have gone too far, he admitted to 60 Minutes correspondent Ross Douthat.
Instead, he stood at the construction site where the new White House ballroom will be built and waxed lyrical about how incredible the building will be.
Jesus may have turned water into wine, but Donald Trump has done one better: he turned Lake Ontario into Lake America and the Gulf of Mexico into the Gulf of America.
Some people would be thrilled for their spouse to be in the spotlight, but I’m not sure that’s the case with Donald.
Imagine if a female athlete said changing diapers wasn’t her job: the rightwing pitchforks would be instantly out for her.
As all that was happening, Usha picked up Death Comes for the Archbishop by Willa Cather.
You may be familiar with rule 34 of the internet, which states that if something exists or can be imagined, there will almost certainly be online porn of it.
“If you had a trigger-happy cop, or somebody had done the wrong thing, somebody could have ended up dead,” Giuffra said.
While the president may hawk bibles as a side hustle, he is not exactly devout; he serves only mammon.
Also by Arwa Mahdawi
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 19 articles by Arwa Mahdawi →

Topics

Democrats Oklahoma Republicans Senate White House

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 12× Republicans NORP · 3× Democrats NORP · 2× Senate ORG · 2× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× House ORG · 1× Kamala Harris PERSON · 1× Oklahoma GPE · 1× Pete Hegseth PERSON · 1× White House ORG · 1×

Narrative

Kamala Harris said recently: “Going in the direction of impeachment is not a good idea … we have limited resources and I think the energy and the resources need to be put into accountability, need to be put into investigations.”
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-11
While the attempt to impeach the defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, failed yesterday, Donald Trump may be worried he’s next.

Claims (36 extracted, 7 hedged)

The days are getting shorter, the nights are getting longer and some Republicans are getting nervous. asserted
Republicans → get → ?
After a long stretch of impunity, it’s impeachment season in the US. asserted
it → ’ → US
While the attempt to impeach the defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, failed yesterday, Donald Trump may be worried he’s next. uncertain
he → impeach → secretary
In January, the president warned Republicans that they had better win the November elections or he would be in big trouble. asserted
he → warn → trouble
“If we don’t win the midterms … they’ll find a reason to impeach me,” Trump said. asserted
Trump → win → me
He repeated this plea to voters during an October rally in Oklahoma: “Pretend I’m running, please. asserted
I → repeat → Oklahoma
And if we don’t win, they’ll end up impeaching me. asserted
they → win → me
I don’t need to tell you what happened with the midterms, do I? asserted
I → need → midterms
The Republicans didn’t just lose – they were given a thrashing so thorough that, for a while, Trump seemed to avoid talking about it. asserted
Trump → lose → it
Indeed, in his first public appearance after the election, Trump largely avoided the issue for a full 20 minutes while talking about his beloved White House ballroom project, rhapsodising about its “magnificent” columns. asserted
Trump → avoid → columns
This week, Trump seems to have moved on to another obsession: he is now making baseless claims that the election was rigged. uncertain
election → seem → claims
Still, while Trump may be in la-la land half the time, in his moments of lucidity you have to imagine he’s worried a comeuppance is coming. uncertain
comeuppance → have → lucidity
There are various ways Trump could be held accountable for any alleged crimes, but what he seems most worried about right now is potential impeachment. uncertain
seems → be → what
It’s a multistep process used to charge a public official with serious misconduct and remove them from office. asserted
It → ’ → office
First, articles of impeachment are brought, then the House votes on whether to adopt these articles via a majority vote. asserted
House → bring → vote
If that happens, the person is impeached. asserted
person → happen → ?
But this is where things get tricky. asserted
things → get → ?
For the official to get removed, the Senate has to hold an impeachment trial and two-thirds of members (67 senators) have to find them guilty; a tough hurdle to clear. asserted
them → remove → members
There have only been eight cases where this has happened and all the officials removed have been judges. asserted
officials → happen → ?
Trump has already made history by being the only president to have been impeached twice: in 2019 and 2021. asserted
Trump → make → 2019
In both cases the Senate acquitted him. asserted
Senate → acquit → him
But now that Democrats have control of government, could Trump become the first president to be removed from office through impeachment? uncertain
Trump → have → impeachment
The short answer is that, while it’s not impossible, it’s unlikely. asserted
it → ’ → ?
The Democrats have a majority, but they still only have 54 seats. asserted
they → have → seats
Attempting to remove Trump would be a gruelling process that many don’t have the appetite for. asserted
many → attempt → appetite
Kamala Harris said recently: “Going in the direction of impeachment is not a good idea … we have limited resources and I think the energy and the resources need to be put into accountability, need to be put into investigations.” asserted
energy → say → investigations
In an interview with NBC News on Sunday, Senator Bernie Sanders went even further. asserted
Sanders → go → Sunday
“We cannot spend all of our time investigating Trump,” Sanders said. asserted
Sanders → spend → Trump
“We have to stand up for working-class families, make a real difference in their lives.” asserted
We → have → lives
Hear me out: how about we do both? asserted
we → hear → both
And look, if impeachment is unrealistic, we can get a little creative and come up with other ways to give Trump and his lackeys a small taste of the misery they have inflicted on the rest of us. asserted
they → look → us
I would suggest exiling the president to an island and forcing him to listen to his incoherent speeches on a nonstop loop, but I suspect he’d quite enjoy that. asserted
he → suggest → that
Although we could fill the place with wind turbines, which enrage him, and make sure the water is filled with sharks. uncertain
water → fill → sharks
Trump is weirdly obsessed with the fish; according to Stormy Daniels he once said: “I hope all the sharks die.” uncertain
sharks → obsess → Daniels
Oh dear, I think I’d better stop there before I have the FBI knocking on my door. asserted
FBI → think → door
If the legal system fails us, let’s just focus on replacing him at the next election. asserted
’s → fail → election
Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

History Support