Photo via New York Post

Giants stand pat at NFL trade deadline after Jonathan Taylor pursuit

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Dunleavy, R. (2026, November 10). Giants stand pat at NFL trade deadline after Jonathan Taylor pursuit. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/11/10/sports/giants-stand-pat-at-nfl-trade-deadline-after-jonathan-taylor-pursuit/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-11-10 · by Ryan Dunleavy

Quick Summary

The New York Giants did not make any significant trades before the NFL trade deadline on Tuesday afternoon, despite reportedly pursuing Indianapolis Colts running back Jonathan Taylor earlier in the week. The Colts declined a proposed deal that included a second- and fifth-round pick from the Giants along with an unnamed player. Instead of making a costly trade, the Giants are betting on their current roster to secure a playoff spot in the weak NFC East division.
Written by AI on 2026-11-10, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The New York Giants remained inactive at the NFL trade deadline on November 10, 2026, choosing not to make any significant roster changes despite pursuing star running back Jonathan Taylor of the Indianapolis Colts. The Giants had offered a second- and fifth-round draft pick plus an unnamed player for Taylor but were rebuffed by the Colts, who held onto Taylor as part of their ongoing fire sale that included trading All-Pro players Quenton Nelson and DeForest Buckner.

The Giants’ inactivity stems from their reluctance to deplete their limited draft capital, especially after a previous trade strategy under general manager Joe Schoen resulted in a two-year setback. Despite the current three-game lead in the loss column in the NFC East, the team’s approach highlights their caution with resources and belief in their existing roster.

The decision not to engage in substantial trades also reflects a strategic gamble by the Giants that their current lineup can compete effectively without external reinforcements.

Written for “Giants Stand Pat At NFL Trade Deadline” on 2026-11-11, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 142980 · logged 2026-11-10

Story

Giants Stand Pat At NFL Trade Deadline
Sports · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 18% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Fox News
Hedges 4 of 28 claims Outlet record 67/100
“While both articles discuss the NFL trade deadline involving Jonathan Taylor, they describe different aspects of the situation: Article A discusses potential trades, while Article B reports on a decision by the Giants not to trade for him.”
New York Post
Hedges 3 of 22 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles discuss potential trade talks involving Jonathan Taylor and the Giants, they refer to different points in time regarding the NFL trade deadline.”
The Guardian
Hedges 3 of 43 claims Outlet record 65/100
“Article A covers various trades and moves by different teams, including the Eagles and Colts, while Article B focuses specifically on the Giants' inaction at the trade deadline.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
11
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
18%
2 of 11 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Sports
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-10 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 18601 article(s) · 39 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 39 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Ryan Dunleavy
75 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
The Giants were steadfast about not subtracting from their limited draft capital for a rental, though there is an argument to be made that surrendering a fifth- or sixth-round pick for a defensive tackle who could help the NFL’s No. 28-ranked rushing defense would have sent a message of belief in the team to the locker room and fan base.
The Giants will have one full practice Tuesday.
Winston’s game-saving cameo was important because the Giants were completely unable to run the ball without the injured duo of Cam Skattebo and Tyrone Tracy Jr. Will that prompt John Harbaugh and Joe Schoen to meet the Colts’ asking price of a first-round pick (or the multi-pick equivalent) for Jonathan Taylor before Tuesday?
“I got hit on one of the touchdowns and didn’t know that Jalen [Nailor] scored, but I could hear our Raiders fans,” Cousins added.
Under different circumstances, the career-best performances by Braelon Allen and Adonai Mitchell could be celebrated as the Jets developing playmakers to complement Garrett Wilson.
Tanking would make sense — if the Colts hadn’t previously traded their first-round pick to the Jets.
If John Harbaugh were picking between two Michigan-bred quarterbacks this week, the Giants would start J.J. McCarthy over Tom Brady.
Edmunds will go from logging every defensive snap in the first six games to missing every snap in the final 11, The Post confirmed, after he was injured late in last week’s game against the Saints.
Maybe it’s time for the NFL to change its logo to include a player’s hand punching at the football that sits atop the shield.
“Maybe now 20 percent of that 30 that was gone is back,” Nagy said before Thursday’s practice.
Also by Ryan Dunleavy
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 75 articles by Ryan Dunleavy →

Topics

Colts Giants NFL Sports+ Super Bowl

Subjects

Giants ORG · 9× Colts ORG · 2× NFL ORG · 2× DeForest Buckner PERSON · 1× Jonathan Taylor PERSON · 1× Keenan Allen PERSON · 1× Paul Schwartz PERSON · 1× Quenton Nelson PERSON · 1× Sports+ ORG · 1× Taylor PERSON · 1×

Narrative

It happened in 2023 — and general manager Joe Schoen admits that breaking from his original vision created about a two-year setback — when they paid Daniel Jones, franchise-tagged Saquon Barkley and traded for Darren Waller to take the next step after winning one playoff game.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-10
The Giants were steadfast about not subtracting from their limited draft capital for a rental, though there is an argument to be made that surrendering a fifth- or sixth-round pick for a defensive tackle who could help the NFL’s No. 28-ranked rushing defense would have sent a message of belief in the team to the locker room and fan base.
2026-11-10 · New York Post
Giants stand pat at NFL trade deadline after Jonathan Taylor pursuit · assertive framing

Claims (11 extracted, 2 hedged)

It won’t be long now until the Giants locker room adopts the popular rallying cry, “We’re all we’ve got.” asserted
we → adopt → cry
After weeks of effort to make a big splash ahead of the NFL trade deadline, the Giants let 4 p.m. Tuesday quietly pass without bolstering a roster that has a three-game lead in the loss column in the NFC East. asserted
that → make → East
Colts held onto running back Jonathan Taylor amid a fire sale that began two weeks ago with All-Pros Quenton Nelson and DeForest Buckner and continued through Tuesday’s exporting of Keenan Allen. asserted
that → hold → Allen
Taylor had been the apple of the Giants’ eye, but the Colts reportedly declined an offer of a second- and fifth-round picks and an unnamed player. uncertain
Colts → decline → picks
The Giants were steadfast about not subtracting from their limited draft capital for a rental, though there is an argument to be made that surrendering a fifth- or sixth-round pick for a defensive tackle who could help the NFL’s No. 28-ranked rushing defense would have sent a message of belief in the team to the locker room and fan base. uncertain
who → subtract → room
Instead, the Giants are betting that they have enough internally to win the NFC East despite season-ending injuries to Jaxson Dart, Brian Burns, Tremaine Edmunds, Chauncey Golston, Calvin Austin and Braxton Berrios. asserted
they → bet → Dart
The Giants have allowed the first taste of success in the past to speed up their process. asserted
taste → allow → process
It happened in 2017 when there were internal Super Bowl expectations after an 11-5 season under first-year head coach Ben McAdoo. asserted
It → happen → McAdoo
It happened in 2021 when they signed Kenny Golladay to a monster contract after nearly winning a bad NFC East with a 6-10 record and grossly overestimating their in-house talent. asserted
they → happen → talent
It happened in 2023 — and general manager Joe Schoen admits that breaking from his original vision created about a two-year setback — when they paid Daniel Jones, franchise-tagged Saquon Barkley and traded for Darren Waller to take the next step after winning one playoff game. asserted
they → happen → game
So, now the Giants are rolling with Cam Skattebo (due back from injury Thursday), Tyrone Tracy Jr. (out at least three more games) and Devin Singletary in the backfield. asserted
Giants → roll → backfield
Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

History Support