Photo via NBC News

Slotkin lawyer warns Blanche not to obey Trump’s ‘frivolous’ demand to investigate her

Read the original at NBC News ↗
Cite

Reilly, R. J. (2026, November 9). Slotkin lawyer warns Blanche not to obey Trump’s ‘frivolous’ demand to investigate her. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/slotkin-lawyer-warns-blanche-not-obey-trumps-frivolous-demand-investig-rcna608311

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

NBC News · collected 2026-11-09 · by Ryan J. Reilly

Quick Summary

An attorney representing Democratic Senator Elissa Slotkin has warned Attorney General Todd Blanche against complying with President Trump's demand to investigate Slotkin over her recent comments about deterring young people from joining the administration. In a letter, former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara argued that such an investigation would be illegal and violate Slotkin’s First Amendment rights. The Justice Department has not commented on Trump’s public directive to launch the probe, which is highly unusual for the department to handle in this manner.
Written by AI on 2026-11-09, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

An attorney for Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin, Preet Bharara, warned Attorney General Todd Blanche against investigating Slotkin at President Donald Trump's request. Over the weekend, Trump demanded that the Justice Department investigate Slotkin's recent comments about how Democratic investigations could deter young people from joining his administration in its final two years. Bharara argued that pursuing such an investigation would suggest a move toward authoritarianism and emphasized that criticism of those in power should not result in legal consequences. The Justice Department did not comment on Trump’s post, leaving the status of any potential investigation unclear.

Written for “Trump's Demand for Investigation Contested” on 2026-11-09, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.45, but all 3 of its quote(s) are attributed speech - words the article quotes from someone, not the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 139245: attributed speech only · logged 2026-11-09

Story

Trump's Demand for Investigation Contested
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 17% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Straits Times
Leans right Hedges 3 of 18 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles involve Trump ordering an investigation into Democrats, they describe different specific incidents: Article A is about a general order to investigate Democrats for threatening people, while Article B specifically mentions an attorney warning against investigating Senator Slotkin over her comments.”
November 5, 2026 Different event
Letters from an American
Leans strongly left Hedges 3 of 69 claims
“The articles describe different events: Article A discusses Jamie Raskin's plans to investigate Attorney General Todd Blanche and subpoena law firms, while Article B focuses on an attorney warning Blanche not to comply with Trump's demand to investigate Senator Slotkin.”
The Bulwark
Leans left Hedges 2 of 7 claims
“Article A discusses Todd Blanche's defense of Trump's threats and promises during a CNN interview, while Article B focuses on an attorney warning Blanche not to comply with Trump's demand for a criminal investigation into Senator Slotkin.”
Dawn
Leans right Hedges 3 of 20 claims Outlet record 72/100
“While both articles mention Trump's demand for an investigation into Democrats, Article A refers to a general call targeting all Democrats while Article B focuses on a specific lawyer's response regarding Senator Slotkin.”
The Hindu
Leans left Hedges 3 of 40 claims Outlet record 78/100
“Article A describes a general standoff between Trump's Justice Department and Democrats regarding investigations, while Article B focuses on a specific demand for an investigation into Senator Slotkin made by Trump.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
23
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
17%
4 of 23 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
72/100
NBC News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-09 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

NBC News · 2301 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Ryan J. Reilly
11 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
Over the weekend, Trump posted on his social media platform that he was demanding the Justice Department look into the Michigan senator’s recent comments about how Democratic investigations into the Trump administration could send a “deterrence message” to young people thinking about joining the administration in its final two years.
Stacey Young, a former Justice Department lawyer who heads the group Justice Connection, said that “Jason Reding Quñiones will forever be known as this president’s Don Quixote for tilting at the windmill of the so-called grand conspiracy,” and that his “departure follows the well-tread path of others who signed up for this impossible dream.” Whoever replaces Reding Quñiones “should heed the great Attorney General Robert Jackson’s wise counsel that prosecutors should select those cases in which ‘the offense is the most flagrant, the public harm the greatest, and the proof the most certain,’” she added.
Attorneys for former FBI Director James Comey will be in court Friday seeking to toss out the third federal criminal case the Trump administration has brought against him in the past 13 months.
A person whose name is redacted in the complaint told Fields that an investigation would be opened because “the President wants this investigation,” Fields’ whistleblower complaint says.
Former special counsel Jack Smith, who brought two since-dismissed federal criminal cases against Donald Trump, is expected to face questions on Tuesday from the president’s allies in the Senate about his handling of his investigation into Trump’s efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss in the lead-up to the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.
The FBI said he confessed after his arrest, but his legal team has noted that he was diagnosed with autism and is expected to seek to have the confession tossed based on his disability or argue he was coerced.
Comey, who has not entered a plea yet in the case, had been set to be arraigned on Wednesday at a federal courthouse in New Bern, North Carolina, but Flanagan pushed the arraignment until January.
2026-09-25 · assertive framing · James Comey seashells case delayed until early 2027
Following several heated exchanges with Senate Democrats, Patel told Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, that he “would appreciate it if you concluded this hearing.”
After Wainstein reached out to diGenova after he accepted the subpoena Thursday, diGenova wrote that he would “arrange counsel” to speak with them.
Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday are expected to advance Todd Blanche’s attorney general nomination after it had been delayed over concerns from two Republican senators on the panel.
Also by Ryan J. Reilly
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 11 articles by Ryan J. Reilly →

Topics

Democratic Michigan Republican WASHINGTON the Justice Department

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 11× Slotkin PERSON · 7× Bharara PERSON · 4× the Justice Department ORG · 4× Blanche PERSON · 3× Department ORG · 3× Congress ORG · 2× Democratic NORP · 2× Republican NORP · 2× WASHINGTON GPE · 1×

Narrative

Bharara’s letter noted that it had been less than a year since the administration failed to indict Slotkin and five other members of Congress over a social media video that reminded members of the military and intelligence communities of their duties not to follow unlawful orders.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-09
Over the weekend, Trump posted on his social media platform that he was demanding the Justice Department look into the Michigan senator’s recent comments about how Democratic investigations into the Trump administration could send a “deterrence message” to young people thinking about joining the administration in its final two years.

Claims (23 extracted, 4 hedged)

An attorney for Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin is warning Attorney General Todd Blanche not to bow to President Donald Trump’s demand for a criminal investigation into her political speech. asserted
attorney → warn → speech
Over the weekend, Trump posted on his social media platform that he was demanding the Justice Department look into the Michigan senator’s recent comments about how Democratic investigations into the Trump administration could send a “deterrence message” to young people thinking about joining the administration in its final two years. uncertain
investigations → post → years
“By copy of this statement, I am ordering the Department of Justice to look into this criminal act, immediately!” Trump wrote. asserted
Trump → order → act
In a letter to Blanche made public Monday, Preet Bharara, the former U.S. attorney in the Southern District of New York, wrote that it “should not be hard to make clear that we do not live in an authoritarian regime where mere criticism of the powerful can land anyone in legal peril and possibly prison.” “That requires a clear and public statement confirming that the Department will not pursue this investigation against Senator Slotkin,” he wrote. uncertain
he → make → Slotkin
The Justice Department didn’t comment on Trump’s post. asserted
Department → comment → post
The attorney general is appointed by the president and is a member of his Cabinet, but it’s still highly unusual for the White House to publicly demand an investigation. asserted
House → appoint → investigation
The Justice Department has long sought to separate politics from the law. asserted
Department → seek → law
But under Blanche, Trump’s former personal attorney, the department has investigated many of the president’s perceived political enemies. asserted
department → investigate → enemies
Slotkin, a former CIA and Defense Department official, was also one of a group of lawmakers the Trump administration tried and failed to indict earlier this year over a social media video. asserted
administration → try → video
A few weeks before the midterm elections, where the GOP saw massive losses, she spoke at the University of Chicago, arguing that Democrats should focus investigative efforts on those who enable Trump. asserted
who → see → Trump
She said she hoped to deter young people coming out of school from joining the administration. asserted
she → say → administration
“I want them to be like, ‘Lord, that might be buying myself a ton of problems that I don’t want, and so let me avoid participating in that,’” Slotkin said. uncertain
Slotkin → want → that
“I want that deterrence message sent.” asserted
message → want → ?
In his post on Truth Social over the weekend, Trump accused Slotkin of “going to go after all young people that believe in Republican Values, and that give even the slightest inclination to be a Republican.” asserted
that → accuse → inclination
Trump’s demand came weeks after Trump ally Mike Davis requested that Harmeet Dhillon — who has since resigned as head of the Civil Rights Division — launch an investigation of Slotkin. asserted
who → come → Slotkin
Bharara wrote that Slotkin’s comments were “entirely lawful” and protected by the First Amendment as well as the “speech and debate” clause of the Constitution, which protects members of Congress. asserted
which → write → Congress
“There is no conceivable basis to investigate the Senator for reminding members of the executive branch who aid the President’s law breaking that there will be accountability for their actions, or expressing the hope that Americans decline to serve in an administration where leaders may ask them to violate the law or misuse taxpayer dollars,” Bharara wrote. uncertain
Bharara → be → dollars
“Indeed, the Senator’s statement reinforces the rule of law.” asserted
statement → reinforce → law
Bharara asked Blanche to publicly decline to follow Trump’s command. asserted
Bharara → ask → command
“The Department should stop threatening our constitutional freedoms and make clear that you will not again launch another frivolous investigation at the taxpayers’ expense,” he wrote. asserted
he → stop → expense
The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. asserted
Department → respond → comment
Bharara’s letter noted that it had been less than a year since the administration failed to indict Slotkin and five other members of Congress over a social media video that reminded members of the military and intelligence communities of their duties not to follow unlawful orders. asserted
that → note → orders
“Thankfully, the anonymous citizens of a Washington D.C. grand jury unanimously rejected the Department’s attempt to punish a perceived political adversary for her lawful — indeed, constitutionally privileged — speech,” Bharara wrote. asserted
Bharara → reject → speech
Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

History Support