Photo via New York Post

Record set straight on Maxx Crosby Rams trade rumors

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Bonsignore, V. (2026, September 16). Record set straight on Maxx Crosby Rams trade rumors. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/09/16/sports/record-set-straight-on-maxx-crosby-rams-trade-rumors/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-09-16 · by Vincent Bonsignore

Quick Summary

The article clarifies rumors about the possibility of trading Raiders defensive end Maxx Crosby to the Los Angeles Rams. Despite initial reports suggesting Crosby turned down the Rams, the piece explains that no formal trade offer ever materialized; the Raiders simply informed the Rams they would keep Crosby. The article also notes positive developments for the Raiders under new coaching, potentially alleviating some of Crosby's concerns about playing on a rebuilding team.
Written by AI on 2026-09-16, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The New York Post reported on rumors surrounding NFL player Maxx Crosby, who was linked to potential trade discussions between the Raiders and the Los Angeles Rams. The article clarifies that while the Rams inquired about trading for Crosby after their interest in signing Myles Garrett, no formal offer was ever made. Sources indicated that when the Rams contacted the Raiders, they were informed that Las Vegas intended to keep Crosby. Thus, it was not Crosby rejecting an offer from the Rams but rather that the trade discussions never progressed beyond the initial inquiry phase. The article suggests that this outcome might ultimately be beneficial for both Crosby and the Raiders, given their recent positive performance in a game against the Miami Dolphins.

Written for “Maxx Crosby Trade Rumors” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Maxx Crosby Trade Rumors
Sports · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
51
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
25%
13 of 51 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Sports
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-16 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 15761 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Vincent Bonsignore
65 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Thirty-nine carries for 198 yards will do that.
🔮 Sensing the crossroads they stood at, they thrashed the Raiders 35-21 with the urgency of a team unwilling to let an opportunity to climb back into the division race, and nudge their season back on track.
🔮 Finding even modest consistency on the ground would help.
🔮 They might have gotten something better.
2026-10-25 · assertive framing · Raiders’ LA rejection turned into a Vegas jackpot
🔮 Yet Thornton remains on the outside looking in. “He will not be activated for this game,” Kubiak said Friday.
🔮 That leaves the Rams trying to rescue their season while waiting to learn whether their path will become even more difficult.
🔮 Although the Raiders owner might appreciate someone explaining how he became a supporting actor in his own burger joint and wardrobe.
🔮 But when owners gather Tuesday and Wednesday in New York for their fall meetings, some of the most important questions will involve accountability in the present.
🔮 If you were measuring the distance, it might be a yard.
🔮 So did a defense that could not produce the stop the Raiders needed on Buffalo’s game-decising possession.
Also by Vincent Bonsignore
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 65 articles by Vincent Bonsignore →

Topics

Las Vegas Los Angeles Raider Raiders Rams

Subjects

Crosby PERSON · 14× Raiders ORG · 11× Rams ORG · 8× Las Vegas GPE · 6× Baltimore GPE · 2× Los Angeles GPE · 2× Raider ORG · 2× Maxx Crosby PERSON · 1× Myles Garrett PERSON · 1× Ravens ORG · 1×

Narrative

So while the situation has been characterized as Crosby saying no to the Rams, the more precise explanation is that he wanted to remain a Raider — and the Rams’ inquiry never advanced beyond that initial conversation.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-16
🔮 And after one week, there is reason to believe the way things unfolded might have worked out pretty well for Crosby and the Raiders.
2026-09-16 · New York Post
Record set straight on Maxx Crosby Rams trade rumors · mixed framing

Claims (51 extracted, 13 hedged)

Before landing Myles Garrett to terrorize opposing quarterbacks, the Rams inquired about another player capable of doing the same. asserted
Rams → land → same
But there is an important distinction between Crosby wanting to remain in Las Vegas and turning down a trade to Los Angeles. asserted
Crosby → be → Angeles
According to multiple sources with knowledge of the situation, Crosby communicated his desire to stay with the Raiders after the Ravens trade fell through. uncertain
trade → accord → Raiders
When the Rams contacted the Raiders to ask about his availability, they were told Las Vegas was keeping him. asserted
Vegas → contact → him
No offer followed. asserted
offer → follow → ?
No trade parameters were agreed upon. asserted
parameters → agree → ?
And no deal was presented to Crosby for him to accept or reject. asserted
him → present → Crosby
So while the situation has been characterized as Crosby saying no to the Rams, the more precise explanation is that he wanted to remain a Raider — and the Rams’ inquiry never advanced beyond that initial conversation. asserted
inquiry → characterize → conversation
And after one week, there is reason to believe the way things unfolded might have worked out pretty well for Crosby and the Raiders. uncertain
things → be → Crosby
One win over the Dolphins will not erase years of frustration. asserted
win → erase → frustration
But the Raiders looked like a team with a plan, players capable of executing it and a coaching staff that knows how to bring it together. asserted
that → look → it
For Crosby, that matters. asserted
that → matter → Crosby
His desire to be traded grew out of dwindling patience with rebuilding programs that kept promising a better future without ever delivering one. asserted
that → trade → one
There are only so many fresh starts an elite player can embrace while the prime of his career ticks away. asserted
prime → be → career
The early indication under new head coach Klint Kubiak is that this version might actually be going somewhere. uncertain
version → go → Kubiak
Crosby has more help. asserted
Crosby → have → help
The defense showed signs of functioning as a connected unit. asserted
defense → show → unit
And the Raiders gave him something more substantial than another offseason sales pitch. asserted
Raiders → give → pitch
They put evidence on the field. asserted
They → put → field
It is a start, with plenty still to prove. asserted
It → prove → plenty
But it helps explain why remaining in Las Vegas could become a positive outcome for a player whose frustration was rooted in wanting to win. uncertain
frustration → help → player
As for how he remained a Raider, the sequence is fairly straightforward. asserted
sequence → remain → ?
According to multiple sources with knowledge of the situation, the Rams contacted the Raiders soon after the Baltimore trade unraveled. uncertain
trade → accord → Raiders
They wanted to understand whether Crosby might still be available and whether there was reason to pursue a discussion. uncertain
Crosby → want → discussion
Were the Raiders still considering moving him? asserted
Raiders → consider → him
Were they open to hearing from another interested team? asserted
they → hear → team
Or had they decided to move forward with Crosby in Las Vegas? For the Rams, it was a logical call. asserted
it → decide → Rams
When a player of Crosby’s caliber appears potentially available, there is every reason to check. asserted
player → appear → caliber
The collapse of one trade created an obvious question about whether another could follow. uncertain
another → create → question
But the answer the Rams received, according to sources, was that the Raiders were standing pat. uncertain
Raiders → receive → sources
The inquiry did not develop into an offer. asserted
inquiry → develop → offer
The teams did not agree to compensation. asserted
teams → agree → compensation
And the process never reached a stage at which Crosby was presented with a potential Rams deal that he then brought to a halt. asserted
he → reach → halt
His remaining in Las Vegas was more straightforward than it has sometimes been represented. asserted
it → remain → Vegas
According to sources familiar with the circumstances, the Raiders represented familiarity and stability for Crosby after the jolt of the Baltimore deal falling through. uncertain
Raiders → accord → deal
There was comfort in the team he knew and the place where he had built his career. asserted
he → be → career
But finding reassurance in Las Vegas and turning down Los Angeles are separate things. asserted
finding → find → Angeles
There is no way to know how Crosby would have responded had the teams negotiated a deal. asserted
teams → be → deal
Perhaps he would have welcomed the possibility. asserted
he → welcome → possibility
Perhaps he would have preferred to stay. asserted
he → prefer → ?
…and 11 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support