'We Are Not Into Bestiality,' FBI Director Kash Patel Tells Members of Congress

Reason · collected 2026-09-16 · by Elizabeth Nolan Brown
Read the original at Reason ↗

Summary

FBI Director Kash Patel addressed recent policy changes regarding applicant qualifications during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. In response to questions about bestiality being no longer an automatic disqualification for applicants, Patel joked, "We are not into bestiality," clarifying that the policy aims to accommodate individuals who were forced into such acts as children rather than condoning human-canine relationships. The article highlights the complexity and nuance required in interpreting these changes, which also relax restrictions on hiring those with past involvement in prostitution under certain conditions.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-16, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
57
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
11%
6 of 57 hedged
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject
Correction & hedging signals
92.6
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
15
Crime & Law
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-16 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

On September 15, FBI Director Kash Patel testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Democrats criticized Patel for his leadership and use of FBI resources, including travel expenses, while Republicans aimed to highlight his efforts in combating violent crime and drug trafficking. The committee questioned Patel about recent controversies involving firings within the bureau, allegations of excessive drinking, and a revision of hiring policies that considered victims of bestiality. Violent crimes in the U.S. had their largest one-year drop on record, according to recent FBI reports.

Written for “FBI Director Testimony” on 2026-09-17, grounded in this article and the 14 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score -0.35 Confidence high
Leaning score -0.35 for article 13907 (high confidence, 2 verified quotes) · logged 2026-09-16

Story

📰 FBI Director Testimony
Crime & Law · 15 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 11% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 7% hedged 6 of 90 📰 publisher trust 59
“Both articles describe the same Senate hearing on the same day where FBI Director Kash Patel testified and discussions about bestiality occurred.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 29 📰 publisher trust 58
“Both articles describe the same exchange between FBI Director Patel and members of Congress regarding the FBI's hiring policies on bestiality during a Senate hearing.”
CBS News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 10% hedged 3 of 30 📰 publisher trust 77
“Both articles describe FBI Director Kash Patel defending changes to hiring standards related to bestiality during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the same day.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 9% hedged 3 of 33 📰 publisher trust 59
“Both articles describe the same Senate Judiciary Committee hearing where Kash Patel was questioned about allegations of bestiality and other misconduct.”
The Hindu
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 10 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles describe different parts of the same hearing; Article A discusses the general context and expected topics, while Article B reports on a specific incident during the hearing about bestiality involving FBI canines.”
NBC News
⚖️ Leans right further right than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 17 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles describe different parts of the same hearing, but the specific incidents mentioned (clashes with Democrats and the bestiality comment) are not the same single occurrence.”

Publisher

Reason · 181 article(s) · 1 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 1 correction(s)
2026-09-05
Lawyers' Responsibility for Hallucinations in Briefs That They Sign

Who wrote this

Elizabeth Nolan Brown
5 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 In August, the Associated Press reported that the FBI would no longer bar the hiring of agents who had paid for sex—with a human, I guess I should clarify—in the past.
🔮 If the web boosted young people's psychological health in its infancy, today's turbocharged tech access could theoretically make things even better.
🔮 Hating data centers might be misguided, but it's also ubiquitous, at least in the U.S.
2026-09-14 · mixed framing · Should Data Centers Go Seasteading?
🔮 Cars will warn drivers whose gaze drifts for more than three to six seconds, depending on their speed.
🔮 Even if you can put aside the ick-factor of HHS trying to sneak political content to viewers like some parents might hide broccoli in muffins, this just makes it a worse show.
Also by Elizabeth Nolan Brown
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

A.P. Congress FBI Senate Judiciary Committee the Associated Press

Subjects

FBI ORG · 12× Patel PERSON · 11× Kennedy PERSON · 6× A.P. ORG · 2× Aaron Ruper PERSON · 1× Congress ORG · 1× Elizabeth PERSON · 1× Elizabeth Nolan Brown PERSON · 1× Kash Patel PERSON · 1× the Associated Press ORG · 1×

Narrative

The back-and-forth was actually fairly typical for congressional hearings, during which whoever is in the hot seat hardly ever gets the time or space to adequately explain themselves and members of Congress usually seem more interested in hearing themselves grandstand than in gaining a genuine understanding.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-16
🔮 In August, the Associated Press reported that the FBI would no longer bar the hiring of agents who had paid for sex—with a human, I guess I should clarify—in the past.

Claims (57 extracted, 6 hedged)

"We are not into bestiality," FBI Director Kash Patel told members of Congress yesterday, moments after assuring them that they were "not going to disqualify" any of the agency's "great canines" for engaging in sexual activity with FBI agents. asserted
they → tell → agents
You are reading Sex & Tech, from Elizabeth Nolan Brown. asserted
You → read → Brown
After watching this exchange from the hearing, I wondered for a moment if journalist Aaron Ruper, who had shared the clip, hadn't been taken in somehow by a deepfake. asserted
who → watch → deepfake
And as far as I can tell, it's not actually a defense of human-to-canine coupling, thank goodness. asserted
it → tell → coupling
It's just Patel handling questions about recent FBI policy changes in pretty much the worst way possible. asserted
It → handle → way
Let's back up a moment. asserted
's → let → ?
In August, the Associated Press reported that the FBI would no longer bar the hiring of agents who had paid for sex—with a human, I guess I should clarify—in the past. asserted
I → report → past
"The move away from an automatic disqualification falls along a continuum of evolving recruitment standards within federal law enforcement and at the buttoned-up bureau, which several years ago relaxed its approach to candidates' past marijuana use," noted the A.P. asserted
A.P. → fall → use
"The bureau still intends to dismiss applicants who are revealed during the vetting process to have engaged in prostitution within the last 10 years, three or more times overall or while in a position of trust such as public safety," according to an A.P. source who "spoke on condition of anonymity." uncertain
who → intend → anonymity
The FBI has a long history of arresting people who pay for sexual activity and people who sell it, so I greeted the policy change with a hearty eye roll. asserted
I → have → roll
The agency isn't saying it will hire someone with a history of solicitation, merely that it won't treat this as automatically disqualifying in all circumstances. asserted
it → say → circumstances
Flash forward to Tuesday's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, which was aimed at FBI oversight generally. asserted
which → flash → oversight
Sen. John Kennedy (R–La.) questioned Patel about recent hiring policy changes, which also removed automatic disqualification for applicants who had engaged in bestiality. asserted
who → question → bestiality
According to Patel, the change has a serious and sad rationale: accommodating applicants who had been forced to engage in heinous acts like bestiality in their youth. uncertain
who → accord → youth
I can't imagine that this is a common hindrance to FBI employment. asserted
this → imagine → employment
(I hope not.) asserted
I → hope → ?
But if the FBI has to change its policy to accommodate even one such person—OK, fine. asserted
FBI → have → person
Patel also said that under the recent policy change, people who had been forced into prostitution could now be considered for FBI roles. uncertain
who → say → roles
What I took his answers to mean was that the policy change simply says it's not automatically disqualifying to have prior experience with prostitution, and the FBI will consider individual circumstances when deciding whether it's actually disqualifying. asserted
it → take → circumstances
This could allow the FBI, at its discretion, to hire people who had been forced into prostitution but to reject some people who had a history of sex work or of paying sex workers. uncertain
who → allow → workers
In general, Patel was pretty abysmal at handling Kennedy's questions about hiring policy changes. asserted
Patel → handle → changes
Because the regs wrote it up in a fashion—before I arrived—that addressed prostitution, bestiality, and trafficking. asserted
that → write → prostitution
They were there before I got there—" Kennedy: "Yeah, but tell me what it said before." Patel: "It automatically disqualified any individual who participated on either side of it. asserted
who → get → it
Obviously, we are never going to hire the criminals—" Kennedy: "Each side of what, the bestiality?" asserted
we → go → what
Kennedy: "So you disqualified the animal?" asserted
you → disqualify → animal
I don't think we… asserted
I → think → ?
We have great canines, but we're not going to disqualify—" Kennedy: "I understand." asserted
I → have → Kennedy
I don't understand. asserted
I → understand → ?
Was Patel trying to make a joke there, with the "great canines" bit? asserted
Patel → try → bit
If so, it seems in poor taste, and it falls flat. asserted
it → seem → taste
It also obfuscates what I think Patel was starting to actually say: that the previous policy punished people who forced others into things like prostitution or bestiality and people who were forced into these things (both sides). asserted
who → obfuscate → things
The exchange goes on: asserted
exchange → go → ?
Kennedy: "Why would you even get into bestiality?" asserted
you → get → bestiality
But a lot of these individuals—" Kennedy: "I know you're not! asserted
you → know → individuals
But you changed—" Patel: "But I'm trying to explain it, hang on—" Kennedy: "You changed the qualifications and mentioned bestiality." asserted
You → change → bestiality
The back-and-forth was actually fairly typical for congressional hearings, during which whoever is in the hot seat hardly ever gets the time or space to adequately explain themselves and members of Congress usually seem more interested in hearing themselves grandstand than in gaining a genuine understanding. asserted
themselves → get → understanding
It's really kind of beautiful and hilarious to see a high-ranking official like Patel subject to the same sort of show-trial nonsense that private individuals hauled into congressional hearings are subjected to. asserted
individuals → see → hearings
I was almost starting to feel sorry for Patel here—until he reminded me that he's the head of the FBI by doing one of the most FBI things possible: wildly exaggerating about human trafficking. asserted
he → start → trafficking
Asked by Kennedy how someone could unintentionally participate in bestiality, Patel replied: "In a lot of these cases, when human traffickers—who are some of the worst individuals on planet earth—they don't just traffic you for prostitution, they traffic you for degrading acts of all kind, and they force you into that kind of conduct." uncertain
they → ask → conduct
Patel is claiming that human traffickers frequently force their victims into having sex with animals. asserted
traffickers → claim → animals
…and 17 more, not listed.
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support