Photo via Daily Mail

Democrats will unleash a wave of subpoenas against Trump and his allies on DAY ONE of their new majority, White House correspondent JON MICHAEL RAASCH claims on latest Deep Dive podcast

Read the original at Daily Mail ↗
Cite

Palmer, J. (2026, November 6). Democrats will unleash a wave of subpoenas against Trump and his allies on DAY ONE of their new majority, White House correspondent JON MICHAEL RAASCH claims on latest Deep Dive podcast. Daily Mail. https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16269219/democrats-subpoenas-trump-allies-day-one-majority-jon-michael-raasch-deep-dive-podcast.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Daily Mail · collected 2026-11-06 · by Joseph Palmer

Quick Summary

Jon Michael Raasch, a White House correspondent for the Daily Mail, claims on the latest Deep Dive podcast that Democrats will begin issuing subpoenas to Donald Trump and his allies immediately after taking control of the House in January. This follows Democrats' historic victory in the midterms, where they flipped seven Senate seats, including those in Texas and Kansas. Raasch cites an unnamed source who predicts that anyone associated with the White House could face investigation, with special attention on topics like the Epstein files and tech companies that have donated to Trump's projects.
Written by AI on 2026-11-06, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.45, but 1 quote(s) could not be found in the article and the other 1 are attributed speech rather than the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 133750: no verified evidence · logged 2026-11-06

Story

📰 Democrat's Gain Majority Midterms
Politics · 926 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 8% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Semafor
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 6 claims Outlet record 68/100
The Straits Times
Hedges 7 of 41 claims Outlet record 66/100
Fox News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 15 claims Outlet record 67/100
“Article A discusses Sen. Ed Markey's threat of subpoenas for tech executives following the midterms, while Article B claims Democrats will issue subpoenas against Trump and his allies starting in January.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 0 of 7 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A reports on a warning from Rep. Garcia to Trump about future investigations, while Article B claims Democrats will start issuing subpoenas immediately upon taking control of the House, based on a White House correspondent's source.”
Fox News
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 7 of 25 claims Outlet record 67/100
“While both articles discuss Democrats planning investigations and subpoenas following their midterm victories, Article A describes immediate reactions after election results were known, while Article B discusses future plans based on a White House correspondent's claims.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 26 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles discuss Democrats gaining control of Congress after the midterms, Article B specifies a more narrow and future-oriented action (issuing subpoenas on Day One) which is not detailed in Article A.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 5 of 29 claims Outlet record 70/100
“While both articles discuss plans by Democrats to investigate Trump's family and allies after winning midterm elections, Article A reports a statement from Robert Garcia immediately following election results, while Article B cites a claim about future actions in January on a podcast. The timing and context of the statements are different.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A discusses the preparation for investigations after midterm elections, while Article B specifically mentions the plan to issue subpoenas starting on Day One of the new majority's tenure.”
Fox News
Hedges 2 of 20 claims Outlet record 67/100
“Article A discusses a GOP defense plan against future investigations, while Article B reports on an expected wave of subpoenas by Democrats upon gaining majority power.”
Times of India
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 6 of 26 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A discusses Trump's plans to use executive powers if Democrats take control of Congress, while Article B focuses on Democrats' intentions to issue subpoenas once they gain majority. Although related, these describe different specific actions planned by opposing sides.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
25
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
8%
2 of 25 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
70/100
Daily Mail's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
926
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-06 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Daily Mail · 9667 article(s) · 23 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 23 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Joseph Palmer
13 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 - LISTEN: Trump's Midterm 'Annihilation': Is MAGA Dead? - Listen to the latest Daily Mail Deep Dive podcast Democrats will start firing off subpoenas at Donald Trump and his allies the moment their new House majority is sworn in this January, a well-placed source has told the Daily Mail's White House correspondent Jon Michael Raasch.
🔮 'If we were to get an allegation linked to America or any other country, then we would refer it to the relevant authorities.'
🔮 In Brand's case specifically, he said, prosecutors knew there would be a wealth of material in his books, stand-up shows and podcasts to support the case against him.
🔮 Join now to start listening Hosted by veteran court reporters Caroline Cheetham and Liz Hull, The Brand Breakdown will get you up to speed on all the claims and counter-claims as the case unfolds.
🔮 She claimed that a photograph at the centre of the investigation, which The Sun alleges shows her father on a bed with a young-looking Asian woman, 'may be one of his girlfriends'.
🔮 The allegations drew a swift response from the Duchess, who said she was 'deeply distressed' and that her thoughts were with 'any children who may have been harmed'.
🔮 'If ever you have to choose between the two, duty will always make you happier in the long run.
🔮 The day before the Sussexes arrived, local news website Nottingham Live published a detailed itinerary of their tour, revealing exactly where the couple would be and when.
🔮 - LISTEN: Will Netanyahu Win Again? Israel's Election and Our Exclusive Interview - Listen to the latest Daily Mail Deep Dive podcast
Also by Joseph Palmer
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 13 articles by Joseph Palmer →

Topics

Democrat Democrats House Senate White House

Subjects

Raasch PERSON · 7× Trump PERSON · 7× Democrats NORP · 6× House ORG · 4× Senate ORG · 4× Democrat NORP · 3× Donald Trump PERSON · 3× Georgia GPE · 3× Jon Michael Raasch PERSON · 2× White House ORG · 2×

Narrative

- LISTEN: Trump's Midterm 'Annihilation': Is MAGA Dead? - Listen to the latest Daily Mail Deep Dive podcast Democrats will start firing off subpoenas at Donald Trump and his allies the moment their new House majority is sworn in this January, a well-placed source has told the Daily Mail's White House correspondent Jon Michael Raasch.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-06
🔮 - LISTEN: Trump's Midterm 'Annihilation': Is MAGA Dead? - Listen to the latest Daily Mail Deep Dive podcast Democrats will start firing off subpoenas at Donald Trump and his allies the moment their new House majority is sworn in this January, a well-placed source has told the Daily Mail's White House correspondent Jon Michael Raasch.

Claims (25 extracted, 2 hedged)

- LISTEN: Trump's Midterm 'Annihilation': Is MAGA Dead? - Listen to the latest Daily Mail Deep Dive podcast Democrats will start firing off subpoenas at Donald Trump and his allies the moment their new House majority is sworn in this January, a well-placed source has told the Daily Mail's White House correspondent Jon Michael Raasch. asserted
source → listen → correspondent
The party seized both the House and the Senate in a historic rout on Tuesday, flipping seven Senate seats, including the Republican strongholds of Texas and Kansas. asserted
party → seize → Texas
As the results rolled in, Democrat Robert Garcia, who is expected to chair the powerful House Oversight Committee, posted a two-word warning to the Trump camp on social media: 'LAWYER UP'. asserted
who → roll → media
Speaking on the latest episode of Deep Dive, Raasch claimed that while the President will be the 'number one' target of the incoming majority, anyone with 'any relationship to the White House' who has cut a deal with the administration could also find themselves under investigation. uncertain
themselves → speak → investigation
He pointed to tech giants who have donated to Trump's new White House ballroom, including Mark Zuckerberg's Meta, which reportedly gave $5million to the project. uncertain
which → point → project
Raasch also highlighted Jared Kushner, the President's son-in-law, who has served as an unpaid envoy in talks over Gaza, Ukraine and Iran while running Affinity Partners, a private equity firm largely backed by Gulf money. asserted
who → highlight → money
Kushner has denied any conflict of interest and insists he has never taken a diplomatic action to benefit his firm. asserted
he → deny → firm
Democrats will start firing off subpoenas at Donald Trump and his allies the moment their new House majority is sworn in this January, a well-placed source has told Jon Michael Raasch asserted
source → start → Raasch
Democrats seized both the House and the Senate in a historic rout on Tuesday, flipping seven Senate seats He added that the Epstein files will be 'a top priority', with Democrats keen to establish whether more documents exist and whether anything is being 'covered up' about the late paedophile financier. asserted
anything → seize → financier
'The subpoenas are supposed to fly on day one,' Raasch said. ' asserted
Raasch → suppose → day
That is what a well-placed Democratic source on Capitol Hill told me just as the tally was coming in. ' asserted
tally → place → me
Congressional committees are now going to be controlled by Democrats. asserted
committees → go → Democrats
Those Democrats then get to say exactly what's going to happen. asserted
what → get → ?
They get to schedule who's going to come up and testify. asserted
who → get → ?
They get to schedule what hearings they're going to have, on what topics and what their priorities are going to be. asserted
priorities → get → what
He's their top priority, and he's going to be the guy that's going to be investigated.' asserted
that → go → ?
Elsewhere in the podcast, Raasch tipped Georgia senator Jon Ossoff, who comfortably won re-election on Tuesday, as the Democrat to watch in the 2028 presidential race. asserted
who → tip → race
Ossoff, 39, a former documentary maker, made headlines in August when he told a campaign rally that Trump would rather 'travel with Natalie' than do his job, a jibe aimed at the President's executive assistant Natalie Harp. asserted
Trump → make → assistant
The remark sparked weeks of coverage and drew Trump's ire, with the President branding the senator 'Pee-wee Herman'. asserted
President → spark → senator
Raasch tipped Georgia senator Jon Ossoff, who comfortably won re-election on Tuesday, as the Democrat to watch in the 2028 presidential race 'He's young, he's got a chiselled jawline, he looks the part of a politician,' Raasch said. asserted
Raasch → tip → politician
'He's been one to really take on Trump, calling out the President by name… asserted
He → take → name
he knows how to strike at the President and how to get him riled up. asserted
him → know → President
'If you look at the odds in the polls, he is one of the top guys to watch.' asserted
he → look → guys
Raasch added that coming from Georgia, a key battleground state, only strengthens Ossoff's hand. asserted
coming → add → hand
Search for Deep Dive wherever you get your podcasts to hear the full episode. asserted
you → search → episode
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support