Photo via Fox News

Democrats ‘divorced from voters’ as 5 states back citizen-only voting, bolstering GOP push

Read the original at Fox News ↗
Cite

Mallon, E. (2026, November 5). Democrats ‘divorced from voters’ as 5 states back citizen-only voting, bolstering GOP push. Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democrats-divorced-voters-5-states-back-citizen-only-voting-bolstering-gop-push

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Fox News · collected 2026-11-05 · by Elaine Mallon

Quick Summary

Voters in five states—Kansas, Alaska, Arkansas, South Dakota, and West Virginia—overwhelmingly approved measures to prohibit noncitizens from voting in state and local elections, with support exceeding 60% in each state. This comes as part of a broader push by Republicans and President Trump to require proof of citizenship for voter registration, which they argue has bipartisan backing based on polls showing that 83% of Americans, including 66% of Democrats, support such requirements. The article highlights the contrast with measures failing in California and Arizona, where there was significant opposition and funding against these proposals, illustrating a divergence between state-level initiatives and national sentiment on election integrity issues.
Written by AI on 2026-11-06, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Voters in five states—Kansas, Alaska, Arkansas, South Dakota, and West Virginia—overwhelmingly approved measures barring noncitizens from voting, with support exceeding 60% in each state. This outcome bolsters Republicans' argument that their push for stricter voter ID laws has "overwhelming bipartisan support." According to a 2024 Gallup poll, 83% of Americans, including 66% of Democrats, favor requiring first-time voters to provide proof of citizenship when registering to vote. The measures clarify or explicitly codify citizenship requirements for voting in state and local elections, reinforcing the GOP's stance on election integrity despite criticism from some Democrats who argue these laws are "divorced from voters."

Written for “Citizen-only Voting Gains Ground” on 2026-11-06, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans strongly right (beta estimate) Confidence high 1 quote(s) discarded as not found in the article
Leaning: leans strongly right for article 132707 (high confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-11-06

Story

📰 Citizen-only Voting Gains Ground
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 16% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 2 of 18 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different events related to election fraud and voting rights, with Article A focusing on California's resistance to federal efforts against noncitizen voting and Article B reporting on voter-approved measures in five states.”
Dawn
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 4 of 28 claims Outlet record 72/100
“The articles discuss different topics: one about voter attitudes towards a potential Democratic manipulation in Alaska's Senate race, and another about ballot measures passed in five states regarding citizen-only voting.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 4 of 22 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A reports on federal court rulings limiting Trump's efforts to pressure election officials before midterms, while Article B discusses voter-approved measures in five states clarifying citizenship voting requirements.”
NPR
Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 60/100
“While both articles discuss voter ID measures, they cover different aspects of voting legislation in various states on election day. Article A broadly covers multiple ballot measures including redistricting and voter ID, while Article B specifically focuses on the outcome of citizen-only voting measures in five states.”
NBC News
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 0 of 26 claims Outlet record 72/100
“While both articles discuss voter-approved measures regarding citizenship requirements for voting, Article A provides a broad overview of multiple ballot measures across several states on various issues, while Article B focuses specifically on the outcome in five particular states regarding citizen-only voting.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
32
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
16%
5 of 32 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
67/100
Fox News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-06 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Fox News · 6785 article(s) · 14 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 14 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Elaine Mallon
51 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 I don't know why they would have pushed him to be the candidate there.
🔮 "I would absolutely agree that noncitizen voting bans are overwhelmingly popular," Jason Snead, executive director of Honest Elections Project, told Fox News Digital.
🔮 May we never have to see the likes of you in this state again."
🔮 Democrat Johnny Garcia is projected to win Texas' newly redrawn 35th Congressional District on Tuesday, overcoming a Republican-favored map designed to flip the seat after redistricting pushed Democratic Rep. Greg Casar into another district.
🔮 The Fox News Decision Desk projects that Democrat Josh Turek will win Iowa's open U.S. Senate seat, flipping a Republican-held seat as the GOP fights to retain control of the chamber.
🔮 Abdul El-Sayed, who became the veritable face of this midterm cycle acting as the GOP’s boogeyman for Democratic policies across the country, is projected to topple former Rep. Mike Rogers in what was one of the most-watched contests of the election.
🔮 Jackson's victory will end Collins’ nearly three-decade career in the Senate.
🔮 The Fox News Decision Desk projects that Democratic Rep. Chris Pappas of New Hampshire will defeat former Republican Sen. John E. Sununu in a competitive and expensive swing state race.
🔮 His administration previously filed a lawsuit against Alaska officials to prevent them from certifying election results if it was deemed Daniel J. Sullivan may have cost Sen. Sullivan the election.
🔮 Sen. Elissa Slotkin's warning to young Americans not to join the Trump administration could backfire by handing Trump officials legal ammunition to derail the investigations Democrats hope to launch if they retake Congress, a former federal prosecutor warned.
Also by Elaine Mallon
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 51 articles by Elaine Mallon →

Topics

Arizona California Democrats Republicans Senate

Subjects

Democrats NORP · 5× Snead PERSON · 4× Arizona GPE · 3× California GPE · 3× Republicans NORP · 3× Senate ORG · 3× Spakovsky PERSON · 3× Alaska GPE · 2× Fox News Digital ORG · 2× Kansas GPE · 2×

Narrative

However, Spakovsky said a ruling in favor of Arizona would only go so far, arguing that proof of citizenship would only apply to future voter registrations. "The only way for them to try to check the citizenship of people who are already registered is by using the SAVE database at the Department of Homeland Security, and with complete control of Congress, I have no doubt that one of the first things Democrats will do is try to defund the database so that states can't use it," Spakovsky said.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-06
🔮 "I would absolutely agree that noncitizen voting bans are overwhelmingly popular," Jason Snead, executive director of Honest Elections Project, told Fox News Digital.

Claims (32 extracted, 5 hedged)

Voters in five states overwhelmingly approved ballot measures barring noncitizens from voting, including Kansas, where Democrats scored a major Senate upset, and Alaska, where the Senate race remains uncalled. asserted
race → approve → upset
Federal law already prohibits noncitizens from voting in federal elections, but measures approved in Kansas, Alaska, Arkansas, South Dakota and West Virginia clarify or explicitly codify citizenship requirements for voting in state and local elections, with support exceeding 60% in each state. asserted
measures → prohibit → state
Election integrity advocates pointed to the results as evidence supporting President Donald Trump and Republicans’ argument that their push to require proof of citizenship for federal voter registration has "overwhelming bipartisan support." asserted
push → point → support
"I would absolutely agree that noncitizen voting bans are overwhelmingly popular," Jason Snead, executive director of Honest Elections Project, told Fox News Digital. asserted
Snead → agree → Digital
"They enjoy bipartisan support." asserted
They → enjoy → support
A 2024 Gallup poll found that 83% of Americans, including 66% of Democrats, support requiring first-time voters to provide proof of citizenship when registering to vote. asserted
% → find → citizenship
The ballot measure wins also come as the conservative-majority Supreme Court prepares to consider a related dispute over whether Arizona can require proof of citizenship on its state voter registration form and remove suspected noncitizens from the rolls before an election, a ruling that could affect how states enforce citizenship requirements. uncertain
states → come → requirements
Related election measures failed in California and Arizona. asserted
measures → fail → California
California’s Proposition 39 was defeated 58.5% to 41.4%, a margin of roughly 17 percentage points; the measure would have required voter ID and additional citizenship-verification procedures. asserted
measure → defeat → ID
"I would note that the unique thing there is not only that California is openly hostile to the idea of trying to prevent noncitizen voting in terms of its elected leadership, but also the left poured more than $30 million into the ballot measure campaign to defeat that asserted
left → note → that
," Snead told Fox News Digital. asserted
Snead → tell → Digital
Snead said Arizona’s measure was broader legislation that included several provisions beyond noncitizen voting, which may have contributed to its defeat. uncertain
which → say → defeat
The victories for the measures barring noncitizens from voting follow the Trump administration and congressional Republicans’ failed efforts to pass the SAVE America Act, which would require proof of citizenship to register to vote. asserted
which → bar → citizenship
The SAVE America Act also became a flashpoint in Congress, with Republicans and Democrats sparring over whether to attach it to a budget reconciliation package. asserted
Republicans → become → package
Trump’s effort to tie the bill to Department of Homeland Security funding contributed to a prolonged standoff during the department’s shutdown. asserted
effort → tie → shutdown
Senate Majority Leader John Thune said Republicans lacked the votes to pass it, while Democrats argued it would disenfranchise eligible voters. asserted
it → say → voters
Hans von Spakovsky, a former member of the Federal Election Commission and senior legal fellow of Advancing American Freedom, said the Democratic Party is completely "divorced" from its voters. asserted
Party → say → voters
Snead agreed, saying Democrats took a "90-10 issue" and turned it into a highly politicized fight. asserted
Democrats → agree → fight
"The left is far out of step with the American public, and they really should be answering the question, 'Why are you opposed to something that 90% of the public is in favor of?" Snead said. "Only citizens should vote in our elections. asserted
citizens → answer → elections
And if you believe, as the left claims to, in democracy, well then, we should start by making sure that we have free and fair elections that are decided only by American citizens. uncertain
that → believe → citizens
" But while Spakovsky applauded the passage of the ballot measures, he warned they could prove ineffective unless states are allowed to verify voters’ citizenship. uncertain
states → applaud → citizenship
"Look, I'm glad those states passed that referendum, but those provisions aren't going to be much good unless states are able to do two things," Spakovsky said. asserted
Spakovsky → look → things
Spakovsky pointed to Republican National Committee v. Mi Familia Vota, a case in which the Supreme Court will decide whether federal law prevents Arizona from requiring documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote in federal elections and from removing suspected noncitizens from its voter rolls. asserted
law → point → rolls
He said the ruling could affect how effectively states can enforce citizenship requirements. uncertain
states → say → requirements
Snead said simply checking a box attesting to citizenship on a federal form has not been sufficient. asserted
checking → say → form
"As we have seen in a number of recent arrests by the Justice Department, with indictments going out against noncitizens, and with the failures of the automatic voter registration system in New Jersey, which added 6,600 noncitizens to the rolls, with almost 400 of them voting, we clearly have been let down by that check-a-box system," Snead said. asserted
Snead → see → system
However, Spakovsky said a ruling in favor of Arizona would only go so far, arguing that proof of citizenship would only apply to future voter registrations. "The only way for them to try to check the citizenship of people who are already registered is by using the SAVE database at the Department of Homeland Security, and with complete control of Congress, I have no doubt that one of the first things Democrats will do is try to defund the database so that states can't use it," Spakovsky said. asserted
Spakovsky → say → it
Snead applauded the Trump administration's efforts to expand states’ access to the SAVE database to clean up their voter rolls, arguing the previous process of tracking down ineligible voters was "cumbersome." asserted
process → applaud → voters
He also voiced concerns that Democrats will gut the database. asserted
Democrats → voice → database
"I would not be surprised if they try to defund the entire safe system or pass legislation to prevent its use for cleaning up voter rolls," Snead said. asserted
Snead → try → rolls
"I think that we are fast approaching the point where it is fair to say, 'Why are Democrats actively pushing for noncitizen voting?'" Snead continued. asserted
Snead → think → voting
"I think that's the direction that we are going." asserted
we → think → ?
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support