Photo via The Independent

Who takes the fall? Hegseth, Rubio and Wiles caught up in White House civil war after midterms wipeout

Read the original at The Independent ↗
Cite

Rascius, B. (2026, November 5). Who takes the fall? Hegseth, Rubio and Wiles caught up in White House civil war after midterms wipeout. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/midterms-hegseth-rubio-vance-white-house-b3079854.html

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Independent · collected 2026-11-05 · by Brendan Rascius

Quick Summary

After Republicans' midterm losses, tension is rising inside the Trump administration as officials seek to deflect blame and protect themselves from potential purges. Key figures like Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth are under scrutiny; he's seen as responsible for the Iran war that exit polls suggest was a significant issue among voters. Sources indicate President Trump may be considering dismissing Hegseth despite claiming full support for him publicly, while others believe General Dan Caine might face removal instead.
Written by AI on 2026-11-05, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In the 2026 U.S. midterm elections held on November 3, Democrats won control of both the House and Senate, marking a significant shift after years of Republican dominance. Despite President Donald Trump's unpopularity, Republicans had hoped to maintain their majority in Congress. However, factors such as Trump’s unconstitutional actions, notably his unilateral declaration of war against Iran, contributed to voter backlash. The election saw Democrats winning in traditionally red states like Texas and South Carolina, leading many analysts to describe it as a "Blue Tsunami." Post-election, there was internal blame-sharing within the Trump administration, with some insiders suggesting that certain cabinet members might face consequences for their roles during the midterm defeats.

Written for “Midterm Elections Results” on 2026-11-05, grounded in this article and the 754 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans right (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans right for article 131935 (high confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-11-05

Story

📰 Midterm Elections Results
Politics · 755 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 15% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Semafor
Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 59/100
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 3 of 28 claims Outlet record 66/100
Fox News
Hedges 0 of 26 claims Outlet record 68/100
Dawn
Hedges 6 of 28 claims Outlet record 72/100
“While both articles discuss Trump's stance on Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth following midterm election results, they focus on different aspects of the situation.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 59/100
“While both articles discuss Trump's response to Republican losses in the midterm elections and his efforts to deflect blame, they describe different aspects of the aftermath, with Article A focusing on Andrew Feinberg's analysis and Article B detailing internal conflicts within the administration.”
BBC News
Hedges 1 of 67 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles discuss reactions within the Republican Party and blame directed at Trump following the midterm election results on November 4th, they describe different aspects of the aftermath: Article A focuses on initial public anger from party insiders, while Article B discusses internal conflicts and potential blame-shifting within the White House.”
The Independent
Hedges 3 of 33 claims Outlet record 59/100
“While both articles discuss political fallout and blame-shifting after Republican losses in midterm elections, they describe different stages or aspects of this broader situation rather than the exact same incident.”
Semafor
Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A describes the midterm election results and their implications, while Article B discusses internal blame-shifting within the Trump administration following those results.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 3 of 50 claims Outlet record 69/100
“While both articles discuss reactions to Republican midterm election losses and blame being placed on President Trump for his Iran war policy, they describe different aspects of the aftermath. Article A focuses specifically on VP JD Vance blaming the president while Republicans criticize him, whereas Article B describes a broader civil war scenario within the administration with insiders scrambling to assign blame.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 4 of 55 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles discuss the aftermath of Republican losses in midterm elections, they describe different aspects and timeframes within that broader context.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
39
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
15%
6 of 39 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
59/100
The Independent's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
755
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-05 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Independent · 3810 article(s) · 10 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 10 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Brendan Rascius
106 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Some said they believe Hegseth will depart the Pentagon before January, when the new Congress is sworn in.
🔮 Americans delivered a resounding rebuke to President Donald Trump in Tuesday’s midterm elections, with Democrats projected to capture both chambers of Congress and usher in two years of divided government.
🔮 Trump’s praise came during a late-night Fox News interview after Democrats were projected to take control of both the House and Senate, dealing the GOP a sweeping rebuke and setting up two years of divided government.
🔮 President Donald Trump sought to distance himself from Republicans’ bruising midterm election losses Tuesday night, claiming his party would have fared better had he been up for reelection.
🔮 As millions of Americans headed to the polls on Election Day, President Donald Trump announced he was switching off Fox News because he could not bear to hear a female host’s voice.
🔮 Her attorney, Peter Ticktin, separately told MSNOW that Trump should be ready to “enter an emergency order that basically would be tantamount to martial law.”
🔮 “As you may have seen, our Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate, Abdul, said I was no longer welcome in his campaign and that I should stay away, and he's right,” Stevens said.
🔮 “If there were, he or she would denounce this racism.
🔮 “Why would you ask such a stupid question?” Trump snapped back, indicating that the reporter was from The New York Times.
🔮 “That is the most intelligent group on Earth, the ‘about 1 percent,’ the one percent that will not answer polls.”
Also by Brendan Rascius
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 106 articles by Brendan Rascius →

Topics

Defense Democrats Pentagon Republicans White House

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 11× Hegseth PERSON · 6× White House ORG · 4× Democrats NORP · 3× Iran GPE · 3× The Daily Mail ORG · 3× Vance PERSON · 3× Cabinet ORG · 2× Defense ORG · 2× Republicans NORP · 2×

Narrative

President Donald Trump has publicly said he has no plans to make Cabinet changes in the wake of Tuesday’s disastrous elections, which saw Democrats romp to victory in once-reliable red states, clawing back control of both the House and Senate.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-05
🔮 Some said they believe Hegseth will depart the Pentagon before January, when the new Congress is sworn in.

Claims (39 extracted, 6 hedged)

A civil war is brewing inside the Trump administration after Republicans suffered crippling midterm losses, with insiders scrambling to assign blame and find someone to take the fall. asserted
insiders → brew → fall
President Donald Trump has publicly said he has no plans to make Cabinet changes in the wake of Tuesday’s disastrous elections, which saw Democrats romp to victory in once-reliable red states, clawing back control of both the House and Senate. asserted
Democrats → say → House
Instead, Trump faulted GOP candidates, congratulated Democrats and appeared eager to move on to other issues, like his White House ballroom. asserted
Trump → fault → ballroom
Offensive and defensive maneuvers are being made: officials are searching for a suitable scalp, while seeking to insulate themselves from a potential purge. asserted
officials → make → purge
Among the key players reportedly caught up in the turmoil are Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles. uncertain
Hegseth → catch → Staff
Staffing changes are not uncommon following bruising midterm elections. asserted
changes → follow → elections
After the 2006 midterms, which saw Republicans suffer heavy losses amid opposition to the Iraq war, George W. Bush dismissed Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. asserted
Bush → see → Rumsfeld
After the Democratic Party’s shellacking in 2010, Barack Obama replaced senior adviser David Axelrod. asserted
Obama → replace → Axelrod
Hegseth is seen by many as the leading contender to take the fall for Tuesday’s bloodbath given his role in prosecuting the Iran war, which was a major concern for voters, according to exit polls. uncertain
which → see → polls
Trump himself has called close advisers, asking them whether the defense secretary should be axed, sources told The Daily Mail. asserted
sources → call → Mail
Some said they believe Hegseth will depart the Pentagon before January, when the new Congress is sworn in. asserted
Congress → say → January
“Trump is making phone calls, contemplating it,” a senior Republican told the outlet. asserted
Republican → make → outlet
If the president doesn’t dismiss Hegseth, the defense secretary is likely to be targeted for impeachment by Democrats. asserted
secretary → dismiss → Democrats
Outgoing Rep. Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, has also vowed to seek Hegseth’s ouster when Congress returns. asserted
Congress → vow → ouster
Over at the Pentagon, the situation feels “very dynamic” with “knives out,” a source familiar with the matter told The Washington Post. asserted
source → feel → Post
However, some close to the administration believe Hegseth may be safe, and that Trump could instead choose to fire General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who has overseen the Iran war. uncertain
who → believe → war
The White House has said Hegseth has the president’s full support, and the defense secretary has said he wishes to remain on until the end of Trump’s term. asserted
he → say → term
Vance, meanwhile, has already made clear he views the Iran war — now in its eighth month with no end in sight — as the proximate cause for his party’s midterm trouncing. asserted
views → make → trouncing
“The reason we lost is the war. asserted
we → lose → ?
The president himself said so last night,” he wrote in a lengthy Wednesday X post. asserted
he → say → post
Trump, who told Fox News that war was one of many factors that influenced Tuesday’s election results, was reportedly caught off guard by the post. uncertain
that → tell → post
“The President was blindsided by the tweet,” a White House official told The Daily Mail. asserted
official → blindside → Mail
Sources described the vice president’s statement as a “calculated effort to distance himself” from the conflict — and to pin the blame on more hawkish officials in the administration, like Rubio. asserted
Sources → describe → Rubio
In the lead-up to the war, Vance was the sole Cabinet official who tried talking Trump out of an all-out assault, The New York Times previously reported. asserted
Times → try → assault
Still, the vice president’s post was mocked by at least one White House insider. asserted
post → mock → insider
“It's too little, too late,” a top Trump official told The Daily Mail. asserted
official → tell → Mail
'He didn't even have the guts to really say the Iran war was a mistake, just that it's the reason we lost… asserted
we → have → guts
He needs to be willing to gamble with Trump's wrath to even have a chance at 2028. asserted
He → need → 2028
At the same time, Wiles, dubbed the “ice maiden” by Trump, is reportedly moving to pit key players — particularly Vance and Rubio — against each other in order to save her own skin. uncertain
Wiles → dub → skin
“Shifting the blame to Hegseth, putting Rubio in the firing line, and giving JD a headache guarantees her survival post-midterm but also protects Trump's legacy,” one source told the outlet. asserted
source → shift → outlet
Vance, who is more closely aligned with the GOP’s America First faction, can argue that he opposed the Iran war from the outset. asserted
he → align → outset
Rubio, seen as a more traditional Republican, could counter that Vance nonetheless played a central role in the conflict, including participating in diplomatic talks that ultimately failed. uncertain
that → see → talks
“It sets up a situation in which Rubio or his allies will say, well no, Mr. President, you had JD negotiate in Iran not me,” the source said. asserted
source → set → Iran
“And that then sets up Vance and Rubio on a collision course.” asserted
that → set → course
Vance and Rubio are friends, and the latter has said he will back the vice president if he decides to run for the White House in 2028. asserted
he → say → 2028
Polls conducted earlier this year showed them both as leading contenders for the party’s nomination. asserted
Polls → conduct → nomination
The Independent has contacted the White House for comment. asserted
Independent → contact → comment
Exit polls indicate that the Iran war was just one of many concerns among midterm voters. asserted
war → indicate → voters
The cost of living, government corruption, artificial intelligence and immigration enforcement also factored heavily into many voters’ minds. asserted
cost → factor → minds
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support