The Aporia
Beinart, P. (2026, November 5). Abdul El-Sayed’s victory has laid bare a truth about America's view on Israel | Peter Beinart. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/nov/05/abdul-el-sayeds-victory-has-laid-bare-a-truth-about-americas-view-on-israel
Beinart, Peter. “Abdul El-Sayed’s victory has laid bare a truth about America's view on Israel | Peter Beinart.” The Guardian, 5 Nov. 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/nov/05/abdul-el-sayeds-victory-has-laid-bare-a-truth-about-americas-view-on-israel.
Beinart, Peter. “Abdul El-Sayed’s victory has laid bare a truth about America's view on Israel | Peter Beinart.” The Guardian, November 5, 2026. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/nov/05/abdul-el-sayeds-victory-has-laid-bare-a-truth-about-americas-view-on-israel.
Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.
In the 2026 Michigan Senate race, Abdul El-Sayed emerged victorious, highlighting a significant shift in American public opinion regarding US policy towards Israel. The election revealed that widespread grassroots support for maintaining military aid and weapons sales to Israel was absent in Michigan, with ordinary Republicans also distancing themselves from this stance. Instead, the campaign saw substantial financial backing from wealthy individuals advocating for pro-Israel policies. El-Sayed's opponents, Haley Stevens and Mike Rogers, were largely seen as proxies for these corporate interests, which diminished their grassroots appeal compared to El-Sayed. Despite media portrayals suggesting criticism of Israel could harm candidates, polls showed that El-Sayed won voters concerned about the issue by an even larger margin than his overall victory margin. This outcome underscores a growing disconnect between elite perceptions and broader public opinion on US-Israel relations in key electoral contexts like Michigan.
the debate over US policy toward Israel does not primarily pit the left versus the right. It pits the top versus the bottom.
There was no grassroots enthusiasm in the state for maintaining US military aid and weapons sales to Israel.
That view no longer commands support even among ordinary Republicans.
There was instead a massive infusion of pro-Israel money, mostly from extremely wealthy people.
El-Sayed poked fun at how few people attended Rogers’ rallies because it illustrated the lack of popular energy in his campaign.
support for Israel was a kind of political hologram. But the media often made it seem real.
While many journalists support Palestinian rights or at least recognize that most Americans no longer favor Israel, networks like CBS and now CNN are owned by pro-Israel billionaires who share the same perspective as Stevens’ and Rogers’ donors.
Students organized encampments to protest the destruction of Gaza; university presidents called in the police to break them up.
Support for Israel is concentrated among the older, the wealthier and the more institutionally affiliated, among the people who populate synagogue boards and fund the local Federations and Jewish Community Centers.
It’s at the bottom – among younger people, who have fewer resources, that anti-Zionism has become a rising force.