Photo via Washington Examiner

Get ready for Democrats to plot their power grabs for 2028

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Faria, Z. (2026, November 4). Get ready for Democrats to plot their power grabs for 2028. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/beltway-confidential/4792637/democrats-plot-power-grabs-2028-electoral-college-supreme-court/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-11-04 · by Zachary Faria

Quick Summary

No summary of this article yet; the story summary below covers the event.

Story

📰 Democrat's Gain Majority Midterms
Politics · 926 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 33% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Semafor
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 3 of 25 claims Outlet record 68/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 5 of 13 claims Outlet record 69/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 1 of 3 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different time periods and outcomes: ARTICLE A focuses on potential changes to voting laws following an expected blue wave in the upcoming election, while ARTICLE B discusses the actual results of the recent midterm elections.”
Dawn
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 6 of 71 claims Outlet record 72/100
“The articles describe different phases of the political situation; Article A discusses final polls leading up to the midterms on November 2, while Article B analyzes the aftermath and implications of the midterm results on November 4.”
Fox News
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 0 of 17 claims Outlet record 67/100
“While both articles discuss the outcome of the 2026 midterm elections for Democrats, Article A focuses on the immediate results and hanging races, while Article B discusses the strategic implications for future elections based on those results.”
Blue Wave Different event
Mother Jones
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 3 of 40 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different aspects of the same election results; Article A focuses on overall control and notable victories in Congress, while Article B emphasizes future planning by Democrats based on their victory.”
ABC News (US)
Hedges 0 of 1 claims Outlet record 67/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the Democrats' victory in the 2026 midterm elections; one focuses on Sen. Cory Booker's comments about a 'big realignment,' while the other discusses the strategic implications for future elections.”
Fox News
Hedges 1 of 23 claims Outlet record 67/100
“While both articles discuss Democrats' strategy following their victory in the 2026 midterm elections, they describe different aspects of the aftermath: Article A focuses on planning for future power grabs and control of Senate, while Article B covers specific calls to action from Kamala Harris.”
CBS News
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 7 of 73 claims Outlet record 69/100
“While both articles discuss the Democratic Party's victory in the 2026 midterm elections, they describe different aspects and outcomes of that event.”
Semafor
Hedges 3 of 3 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss different timeframes for potential Democratic gains in power, one focusing on immediate post-election scenarios (2026) and the other on planning for future elections (2028).”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
3
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
33%
1 of 3 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
69/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
926
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-05 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 4342 article(s) · 8 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 8 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Zachary Faria
31 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Los Angeles voters chose to dump Mayor Karen Bass, herself a sympathizer of Cuba’s communist regime, in favor of Democratic Socialists of America member Nithya Raman.
🔮 The Democratic Party’s sweep into power in the 2026 midterm elections means Democrats will spend the next two years planning the extreme power grabs they have been agitating for, to be carried out if they retake the White House in 2028.
🔮 Cornyn was not a perfect senator, but the decision to uproot him came primarily from his unwillingness to tell Republican voters exactly what they wanted to hear when reality did not reflect it.
🔮 Newsom, who will leave office in January as the state’s term-limited governor (and will almost certainly run for president in 2028), announced he was “proposing the expansion of California’s current Film and Television Tax Credit Program from $750 million to at least $1 billion, and expanding the program as the nation’s largest capped film and TV tax credit.”
🔮 You may think that Chicago is a haven of violent crime.
🔮 If only the Democratic politicians who have continued to pour money into the project would do the same.
🔮 How will Xavier Becerra differ from Gavin Newsom as governor of California?
2026-10-30 · assertive framing · Becerra will be Newsom, but worse for California
🔮 Next week’s midterm elections will give voters in a couple of Democrat-run states the opportunity to roll back transgender ideology and protect children from the injustice and medical malpractice Democrats are allowing to be inflicted upon them.
🔮 Further complicating matters is that Proposition 40 could pass and still be voided by Propositions 41 and 42 if either one passes with more support than Proposition 40.
🔮 Like, that sounds fun, I might get an opportunity.’
Also by Zachary Faria
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 31 articles by Zachary Faria →

Topics

Democrats Mississippi Senate The Democratic Party’s the White House

Subjects

Senate ORG · 3× Democrats NORP · 2× Mississippi GPE · 2× Alaska GPE · 1× Democratic NORP · 1× GOP ORG · 1× Texas GPE · 1× The Democratic Party’s ORG · 1× the Republican Party ORG · 1× the White House ORG · 1×

Narrative

The Democratic Party’s sweep into power in the 2026 midterm elections means Democrats will spend the next two years planning the extreme power grabs they have been agitating for, to be carried out if they retake the White House in 2028.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-05
🔮 The Democratic Party’s sweep into power in the 2026 midterm elections means Democrats will spend the next two years planning the extreme power grabs they have been agitating for, to be carried out if they retake the White House in 2028.
2026-11-05 · Washington Examiner
Get ready for Democrats to plot their power grabs for 2028 · mixed framing

Claims (3 extracted, 1 hedged)

The Democratic Party’s sweep into power in the 2026 midterm elections means Democrats will spend the next two years planning the extreme power grabs they have been agitating for, to be carried out if they retake the White House in 2028. asserted
they → mean → 2028
Democrats have secured 54 Senate seats and could add two more in Alaska and Mississippi, cementing a wipeout victory that could see them hold the Senate for at least four years. uncertain
them → secure → years
That includes adding Democratic senators from traditional GOP strongholds Texas, Kansas, and Iowa, along with the possible victory in Mississippi and the win in Ohio, which more recently became a “solid” red state. asserted
which → include → Ohio
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support