Photo via The Guardian

The new Congress must hold Trump accountable | Claire Finkelstein

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Finkelstein, C. (2026, November 4). The new Congress must hold Trump accountable | Claire Finkelstein. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/nov/04/democrats-congress-trump

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-11-04 · by Claire Finkelstein

Quick Summary

Legal scholar Claire Finkelstein argues that the new Democratic-led Congress must focus on holding President Trump accountable through oversight investigations rather than legislative reform. This approach is motivated by voter discontent with Trump's impact on economic issues like rising prices and his overall leadership, as shown in recent polls where 53% of respondents viewed him as corrupt. Despite Democratic control over both houses of Congress, Finkelstein cautions that the new leaders face significant challenges including Republican filibusters and presidential vetoes, making it difficult to pass laws but easier to conduct investigations aimed at accountability and strengthening congressional oversight.
Written by AI on 2026-11-04, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In Tuesday's midterm elections, voters overwhelmingly favored Democrats for both the US House of Representatives and the US Senate, signaling an end to the Republican party’s strong support for Donald Trump. Polls from September indicated that 53% of those surveyed believed the president was corrupt, while many Republicans expressed disappointment with the economy and rising prices under his leadership.

Leaders of the newly elected Congress must now address the significant damage inflicted on US democracy during Trump's six-year presidency, focusing on badly-needed legislative reforms. However, despite Democrats controlling both houses, they face substantial obstacles such as divisions within their own party and potential Republican filibusters in the Senate. Additionally, negotiating with Trump to avoid vetoes will be necessary for passing any major legislation.

Written for “Holding Trump Accountable” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans left (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans left for article 128497 (high confidence, 3 verified quotes) · logged 2026-11-04

Story

📰 Holding Trump Accountable
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 8% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Los Angeles Times
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 4 of 30 claims Outlet record 95/100
“Article A describes the low approval ratings of Congress before the election, while Article B reports on the results of the midterm elections and their implications.”
Zeteo
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 0 of 6 claims
“The articles discuss different aspects of a broader context around the midterm elections and public opinion towards Trump, rather than describing the exact same incident.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 3 of 22 claims Outlet record 61/100
“While both articles discuss the results of the midterm elections and their implications on Trump's presidency, they refer to different stages: Article A predicts the outcome before it happens, while Article B discusses its aftermath.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 9 of 37 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses legal preparations by Trump's allies in anticipation of Democratic investigations following potential midterm election results, while Article B comments on voter sentiment and poll data indicating disenchantment with Trump leading up to the midterms.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 7 of 61 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A discusses the context and implications of the midterm elections before they occur, while Article B analyzes their outcome a day after the election. Although related, they describe different phases of the event.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A reports on the live developments and closing of polls in the US midterm elections, while Article B discusses the aftermath and results interpretation following the election.”
The Straits Times
Hedges 0 of 12 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the midterm elections' outcomes and implications rather than a single specific incident or speech.”
The Dispatch
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of political sentiment and strategy rather than describing the exact same specific incident.”
Semafor
Hedges 0 of 6 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the political landscape post-midterms but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 6 of 48 claims Outlet record 64/100
“While both articles discuss the impact of President Trump on midterm election results, Article A is an analysis leading up to and during the elections, while Article B discusses the aftermath with specific outcomes.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
39
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
8%
3 of 39 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-04 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 2029 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Claire Finkelstein
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 While it will be tempting to try to press ahead with badly-needed legislative reform, the obstacles to turning bills into law will still be nearly insuperable, despite Democratic control over both houses of Congress.
🔮 California’s submission to the court, joined by twenty-two states and the district of Columbia, asking the court to leave the injunction against the rule change in place, made clear that compliance with the rules in advance of the midterms would not only be difficult; it would be impossible without disenfranchising thousands of voters.
Also by Claire Finkelstein
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Congress Democratic Democrats House Republican

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 11× Congress ORG · 7× Democrats NORP · 4× House ORG · 4× Democratic NORP · 3× Donald Trump PERSON · 2× Republican NORP · 2× Senate ORG · 2× the Republican party ORG · 1× the US House of Representatives ORG · 1×

Narrative

Although the House heard from some two dozen witnesses, impeachment managers largely gave up on forcing the most critical ones to appear, such as the Vice-President Mike Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, National Security Adviser John Bolton, Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Guiliani and Director of the Office of Management and Budget, Mick Mulvaney.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-04
🔮 While it will be tempting to try to press ahead with badly-needed legislative reform, the obstacles to turning bills into law will still be nearly insuperable, despite Democratic control over both houses of Congress.
2026-11-04 · The Guardian
The new Congress must hold Trump accountable | Claire Finkelstein · assertive framing

Claims (39 extracted, 3 hedged)

In Tuesday’s midterm elections, voters sent the Republican party an unmistakable message: their love affair with Trumpism is coming to an end. asserted
affair → send → end
The overwhelming victory for Democrats in both the US House of Representatives and the US Senate, was foreshadowed by a number of polls showing growing disenchantment with Donald Trump – and it was personal. asserted
it → foreshadow → Trump
One poll in September of this year found that 53% of those surveyed believe the president is corrupt. asserted
president → find → those
Another identified growing disappointment among Republican voters relating to the economy. asserted
Another → identify → economy
Voters held Trump responsible for rising prices, particularly for pain at the pump. asserted
Trump → hold → pump
Leaders of the 120th Congress must not squander this opportunity to make real headway on the monumental task of repairing the damage to US democracy inflicted by six years of Trump. asserted
Leaders → squander → Trump
While it will be tempting to try to press ahead with badly-needed legislative reform, the obstacles to turning bills into law will still be nearly insuperable, despite Democratic control over both houses of Congress. asserted
obstacles → try → Congress
Managing divisions among Democrats themselves; avoiding derailment from a Republican filibuster in the Senate; negotiating with Trump to head off the inevitable veto on most, if not all, Democratic-led law reform effort, and other road bumps along the way will have congressional leaders spinning their wheels while real change remains elusive. asserted
change → manage → wheels
Democrats are more likely to achieve lasting gains through sustained oversight investigations directed towards two goals: providing accountability in the executive branch and strengthening the institution of Congress itself. asserted
Democrats → achieve → Congress
Effective investigations will require Congress to force members of Trump’s inner circle to participate in public testimony on highly incriminating subjects, and that will require the patience to issue subpoenas and methodically seek their enforcement. asserted
that → require → enforcement
Lessons from two failed bids to impeach Trump should prove instructive here. asserted
Lessons → fail → Trump
House Democrats tried to call key witnesses in the administration who likely had firsthand knowledge of the illegal scheme, but Trump blocked their appearance by asserting executive privilege and testimonial immunity. asserted
Trump → try → privilege
Although the House heard from some two dozen witnesses, impeachment managers largely gave up on forcing the most critical ones to appear, such as the Vice-President Mike Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, National Security Adviser John Bolton, Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Guiliani and Director of the Office of Management and Budget, Mick Mulvaney. asserted
managers → hear → Management
The only subpoena House impeachment leaders decided to pursue was against the White House lawyer Don McGahn, but the ensuing two-year court battle meant the resulting negotiated testimony was too little too late. asserted
testimony → decide → lawyer
As I argued in an opinion piece in 2020, the first impeachment of Donald Trump displayed a lamentable circularity. asserted
impeachment → argue → circularity
Congress was stymied in its ability to investigate the second article of impeachment – “obstruction of Congress” – by the very same sort of obstruction at issue in the proceedings. asserted
Congress → stymie → proceedings
In the face of Trump’s interference, speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, along with other Democratic congressional leaders, believed the political costs of a protracted battle over witnesses was not worth the candle. asserted
costs → believe → witnesses
But what was lost in the shuffle was the importance of asserting Congress’ role as a check on the executive branch – and that meant the power to issue and enforce subpoenas. asserted
that → lose → subpoenas
The error was repeated during the second Trump impeachment in 2021, when the Senate reversed itself on a vote to call witnesses during the trial and ended up calling none. asserted
Senate → repeat → none
Forcing those nearest to the president to testify on the events of 6 January 2021 could have provided critical fodder for the special counsel Jack Smith’s criminal indictment of Trump during the Biden administration. uncertain
those → force → administration
But even more critically: it would also have strengthened Congress’s oversight authority. asserted
it → strengthen → authority
From the standpoint of democratic repair, the impeachments reinforced congressional ineffectiveness and made the impeachments largely counterproductive. asserted
impeachments → reinforce → ineffectiveness
Undertaking a serious and systematic attempt to restore congressional authority would not be easy. asserted
Undertaking → undertake → authority
As the US supreme court reminded Congress in the 2020 case of United States v Mazars, separation of powers objections may outweigh congressional oversight authority in the absence of a “clear legislative aim”. uncertain
objections → remind → aim
But there’s a crucial lesson buried here: had Congress not been in such a hurry to wrap up the first impeachment investigation, House subpoenas for Trump’s tax returns and other financial records would have been issued incident to an impeachment inquiry, and the Mazars case would have come out differently. asserted
case → ’ → inquiry
Congress will now face this choice again. asserted
Congress → face → choice
Impeachment investigations against several members of the current administration would protect congressional subpoenas from Mazars-type objections, along with the inevitable assertions of presidential privilege Trump will make. asserted
Trump → protect → privilege
The iconoclastic Republican congressman from Kentucky, Thomas Massie, has already filed articles of impeachment against the secretary of defense Pete Hegseth. asserted
congressman → file → defense
Starting with a member of Trump’s cabinet, rather than Trump himself, is a smart strategy for forcing cooperation, one that prosecutors know all too well from prosecuting organized crime. asserted
prosecutors → start → crime
It will also help minimize presidential interference in the push for transparency. asserted
It → help → transparency
Although Democratic leaders have refused to support efforts to impeach Trump for a third time, the House minority leader, Hakeem Jeffries, made clear that impeachment would be on the menu if the House changed hands. asserted
House → refuse → hands
Now leaders of the 120th Congress must weigh the costs and benefits of a third impeachment highly unlikely to result in removal. asserted
leaders → weigh → removal
But in the plus column belong the oversight benefits of conducting a long, slow investigation that enhances transparency while enabling Congress to reassert its authority. asserted
that → belong → authority
Repair of democratic institutions will be a lengthy process, and a critical interim goal will be strengthening the oversight powers of the new Congress and every Congress thereafter. asserted
goal → strengthen → Congress
Simultaneously with this effort, Congress must put its own house in order by passing internal ethics measures designed to eliminate congressional conflicts of interest and enhance internal integrity, or newly strengthened congressional oversight powers could be weaponized against a law-abiding occupant of the Oval Office. uncertain
powers → put → Office
But right now an overly powerful Congress presents a distant and unlikely threat. asserted
Congress → present → threat
If past attempts to hold Trump accountable have taught us anything, it is that allowing presidents to control the very processes by which their own conduct is judged poses an even graver danger to democracy than straightforward presidential law-breaking. asserted
conduct → hold → breaking
The new Congress should be singularly focused on reversing this breakdown in the democratic process and restoring the role of Congress as a true check on presidential authority. asserted
Congress → focus → authority
Claire Finkelstein, a contributing opinion writer for the Guardian, is the Algernon Biddle professor of law and professor of philosophy at the University of Pennsylvania. asserted
Finkelstein → contribute → Pennsylvania
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support