The Aporia
Visontay, E. (2026, November 4). Blow for gig economy as Uber loses $81m High Court battle. The Sydney Morning Herald. https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/blow-for-gig-economy-as-uber-loses-81m-high-court-battle-20261104-p61baf.html?ref=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_source=rss_feed
Visontay, Elias. “Blow for gig economy as Uber loses $81m High Court battle.” The Sydney Morning Herald, 4 Nov. 2026, https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/blow-for-gig-economy-as-uber-loses-81m-high-court-battle-20261104-p61baf.html?ref=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_source=rss_feed.
Visontay, Elias. “Blow for gig economy as Uber loses $81m High Court battle.” The Sydney Morning Herald, November 4, 2026. https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/blow-for-gig-economy-as-uber-loses-81m-high-court-battle-20261104-p61baf.html?ref=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_source=rss_feed.
Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.
The High Court of Australia ruled on November 3, 2026, that Uber must pay $81 million in payroll tax for the financial years from 2015 to 2020 in New South Wales. The court dismissed Uber's argument that it was merely a "payment collection agent" and found that its drivers were employees under contracts, making payments to them wages for payroll tax purposes. This decision is expected to have broader implications for the gig economy. Initially successful in challenging the NSW Chief Commissioner of State Revenue’s assessment, Uber lost its appeal with six out of seven justices ruling against it. The company will also be required to cover the legal costs incurred by the state revenue authority.