Photo via Daily Mail

Trump is 'considering nuclear strike on Iran', former CIA agent claims

Read the original at Daily Mail ↗
Cite

Cotterill, T. (2026, November 3). Trump is 'considering nuclear strike on Iran', former CIA agent claims. Daily Mail. https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16261459/donald-trump-nuclear-weapon-strike-iran-claim.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Daily Mail · collected 2026-11-03 · by Tom Cotterill

Quick Summary

A former CIA agent, John Kiriakou, claims that President Donald Trump is considering launching a nuclear strike against Iran's Pickaxe Mountain facility. Kiriakou asserts that Trump aims to break the "final taboo" around using nuclear weapons and empower future presidents to do the same more freely. The article discusses concerns over the potential use of tactical nuclear weapons in this conflict, highlighting the facility’s underground nature and conventional bombs' limited effectiveness against it.
Written by AI on 2026-11-03, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On November 2, 2026, conservative commentator Tucker Carlson claimed on X that Donald Trump might launch a nuclear strike against Iran within days under pressure from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. This claim, which gained significant attention and over 53 million views, suggests that Washington could take a decision on the use of nuclear weapons soon. However, no official confirmation or denial has been made by the US government regarding this allegation. Some critics, like Christopher Tremoglie from the Washington Examiner, argue that Carlson's assertion is unfounded and unrealistic given Trump’s previous statements rejecting the use of nuclear weapons against Iran.

Written for “Tucker Carlson Claims Trump Considers Nuke Strike Iran” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 6 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it +0.35, but 1 quote(s) could not be found in the article and the other 3 are attributed speech rather than the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 125467: no verified evidence · logged 2026-11-03

Story

📰 Tucker Carlson Claims Trump Considers Nuke Strike Iran
Politics · 7 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 20% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 2 of 4 claims Outlet record 70/100
“Article A discusses Tucker Carlson's claims about an impending U.S. strike on Iran, while Article B reports on a former CIA agent's claim that Donald Trump is considering such action based on comments made by Tucker Carlson.”
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 4 claims
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 1 of 5 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different claims about President Trump's potential actions regarding Iran but do not describe the same specific incident.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 9 of 28 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the potential military actions against Iran; one describes a meeting to brief options and another claims Trump is considering a nuclear strike, which are separate events.”
The Hindu
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 7 of 33 claims Outlet record 77/100
“The articles describe different aspects of the situation with Iran; one reports on President Trump's statements about remaining military targets, while the other claims a former CIA agent is alleging that Trump may be considering a nuclear strike.”
Times of India
Hedges 10 of 35 claims Outlet record 59/100
“While both articles discuss claims about potential US nuclear strikes on Iran, they report different sources making these claims at different times.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 5 of 10 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Hindu
Hedges 6 of 37 claims Outlet record 77/100
“The articles refer to different aspects of potential U.S. actions towards Iran and do not describe the same specific incident.”
The Independent
Hedges 5 of 18 claims Outlet record 59/100
“While both articles discuss potential actions by Donald Trump regarding Iran, they describe different sources making claims (Tucker Carlson and John Kiriakou) with slightly different emphases and contexts.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
54
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
20%
11 of 54 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
69/100
Daily Mail's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
7
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-03 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Daily Mail · 9008 article(s) · 22 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 22 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Tom Cotterill
11 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 His comments come after Tucker Carlson, a former Fox News presenter and Maga whisperer, claimed Trump 'may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran'.
🔮 Some 300 soldiers from the British Army's 7 Brigade are heading to Poland to rehearse how they could one day support Ukraine if and when the war ends.
🔮 Two of his mightiest aircraft carriers, the USS George Washington and USS George W Bush, are already lurking, accompanied by a heavily-armed flotilla of 17 warships, which includes the USS Boxer amphibious readiness group.
🔮 Russia is developing a new nuclear weapon in space that could be detonated in orbit, the Pentagon has warned.
🔮 John Healey's defence spending promises faced fresh doubt tonight after he refused to give a guarantee that he would meet them.
🔮 The Chancellor vowed to spend 3 per cent of GDP on defence by 2030 – when ministers fear Russia could attack Europe – and to hit a Nato target of 3.5 per cent by 2035.
🔮 In a chilling new threat to the West, the Russian tyrant said there would be 'no winners' if he entered a conflict with Nato.
🔮 The platform has been built in a matter of months to counter Vladimir Putin's most advanced jet-powered drones and cruise missiles, which have caused mayhem in Ukraine in recent weeks.
🔮 The veteran commander's intervention came as fears the UK could soon be plunged into a war deepened on Thursday after Britons were told to stockpile three days' worth of food and water.
Also by Tom Cotterill
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 11 articles by Tom Cotterill →

Topics

America CIA Iran Iranians the Central Intelligence Agency

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 9× Iran GPE · 8× America GPE · 3× Iranians NORP · 3× Tehran GPE · 3× CIA ORG · 2× Donald Trump PERSON · 2× John Kiriakou PERSON · 2× the Central Intelligence Agency ORG · 2× Tucker Carlson PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Pictured: A destroyed building on the island from September Iranians stand in front of an anti-US and anti-Israel billboard during a gathering in Tehran's Enghelab Square on Nov 3 The strikes appeared to be limited as opposed to a return to full hostilities but followed President Trump previously saying the US would not launch new strikes on Iran before Tuesday's midterms.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-03
🔮 His comments come after Tucker Carlson, a former Fox News presenter and Maga whisperer, claimed Trump 'may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran'.

Claims (54 extracted, 11 hedged)

Donald Trump is 'considering' launching a nuclear strike on Iran to destroy its Pickaxe Mountain lair, a former CIA agent has claimed. asserted
agent → consider → lair
John Kiriakou, who worked at the Central Intelligence Agency from 1990 to 2004, warned the US President was seeking to 'break' the 'final taboo' around dropping nuclear bombs. asserted
President → work → bombs
The former spy claimed Mr Trump wanted to ensure future presidents 'feel empowered' to use America's arsenal of ultimate weapons more liberally. asserted
presidents → claim → weapons
His comments come after Tucker Carlson, a former Fox News presenter and Maga whisperer, claimed Trump 'may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran'. uncertain
Trump → come → Iran
'I've heard the same thing from my own contacts at the White House, that the President is considering the use of a tactical nuclear weapon against Pickaxe Mountain so it will penetrate to the point that it will destroy everything that's underground,' Mr Kiriakou told Piers Morgan Uncensored. asserted
Kiriakou → hear → Morgan
'But more than that, he wants to break that final taboo - and I'm told that's the word he is using: "the final taboo" - so that future presidents would feel empowered to use a nuclear weapon. asserted
presidents → want → weapon
I think it's crazy.' asserted
it → think → ?
Such weapons have not been used in anger since the end of the Second World War, when America used nuclear bombs to level the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. asserted
America → use → 1945
In the past, Iran has openly discussed plans to build centrifuges to support its nuclear enrichment efforts at Pickaxe Mountain. asserted
Iran → discuss → Mountain
The complex is also estimated to be large enough to house an enrichment plant. asserted
complex → estimate → plant
Although its true purpose remains shrouded in mystery. asserted
purpose → remain → mystery
Donald Trump is allegedly considering using nuclear weapons, a former CIA agent has claimed The Pickaxe Mountain nuclear facility is hidden deep in central Iran (pictured in June 2026) Conventional bunker-buster bombs have so far struggled to cause enough damage to Iran's mountain facility, which is deep underground. uncertain
which → consider → facility
The deployment of a smaller tactical nuke, like the air-launched 400 kiloton B61-11, could pack enough punch to destroy the facility. uncertain
deployment → launch → facility
Fears the US was about to nuke Iran deepened overnight after a nuclear strike warning was broadcast by Iranian state TV. asserted
warning → nuke → TV
In the broadcast, Iranians were warned that in the event of a nuclear blast to 'take shelter behind a barrier, lie on the ground and cover your head and face' and not to look at 'intense flash'. asserted
Iranians → warn → flash
Once the blast wave passed, the public was urged to 'enter the nearest building' and to not 'stay to watch or take photos' of the blast's aftermath, Saudi Arabian news agency Al Arabiya, reported. asserted
agency → pass → aftermath
It added people should take shelter for 24 hours and wait for official announcements giving the all clear. asserted
people → add → clear
As concerns continue to grow, there was a palpable sense of fury in Tehran, with Iranians taking to the streets of the capital on Tuesday morning, holding signs declaring: 'Trump must die'. asserted
Trump → continue → signs
A large billboard in Enghelab Square also showed a mocked-up image of Trump behind bars, with the words 'We will kill Trump' emblazoned upon it. asserted
We → show → it
Dropping nuclear bombs on Iran would be an extraordinary step by America, with the claims widely derided. uncertain
claims → drop → America
The radioactive fallout could spread hundreds of miles across the Middle East. uncertain
fallout → spread → East
John Kiriakou, who worked at the Central Intelligence Agency from 1990 to 2004, is pictured on Piers Morgan Uncensored A large billboard in Enghelab Square also showed a mocked-up image of Trump behind bars, with the words 'We will kill Trump' emblazoned upon it. asserted
We → work → it
Iranians were seen holding signs saying 'Trump must be killed' on Tuesday in Tehran President Trump previously suggested he had no intention of dropping nuclear bombs on Iran. 'We don't need it. uncertain
We → see → it
Why do I need it?' he said in April, when asked about the prospect of nuking Tehran. asserted
he → need → Tehran
'Why would a stupid question like that be asked? asserted
question → ask → that
Why would I use a nuclear weapon where we've totally in a very conventional way decimated them without it. asserted
we → use → it
' 'A nuclear weapon should never be allowed to be used by anybody,' he added. asserted
he → allow → anybody
The American leader repeated the stance at the end of August, saying: 'They're totally defeated militarily, so I defeat them, and now I should use a nuclear weapon on top of them? What a stupid question.' The Pentagon has not said if America is considering the use of tactical nuclear strikes - and Trump has yet to address the latest rumour. asserted
Trump → repeat → rumour
However, on Monday night, the President did not shy away from the prospect of resuming some form of strike against the underground facility at Pickaxe Mountain, which the US believes Iran might be using to produce weapons-grade uranium. uncertain
Iran → shy → uranium
'We might have to go after Pickaxe, but that's not a big deal,' he told Fox News. uncertain
he → have → News
'We can do it in literally one hour.' asserted
We → do → hour
Experts have downplayed the chances that Trump would order a nuclear strike on the mountain complex - but they could not rule it out entirely. uncertain
they → downplay → it
No,' Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control Association (ACA) told TWZ. asserted
Kimball → tell → TWZ
Is it possible that an unstable desperate president who has sole authority to authorise nuclear weapons use, would do so, yes. asserted
who → have → use
Given the situation, it is crucial that responsible US voices and international leaders speak out against a massive US strike on Iran of any kind.' asserted
voices → give → kind
Analysts have claimed it is likely that the US is preparing to launch a third wave of military strikes against Iran. asserted
US → claim → Iran
In recent weeks, Washington has massed a massive naval strike force in the Arabian Sea, with two heavily-armed carrier strike groups and amphibious assault ships in the region. asserted
Washington → mass → region
A third carrier strike group, led by the USS Theodore Roosevelt, is also steaming towards the Middle East from the Philippine Sea, accompanied by the 13th Marine Expeditionary Unit amphibious assault force. asserted
group → lead → force
The battle group is expected to arrive in a matter of days, bringing the total number of American sailors and marines in the region to more than 20,000, with more than 20 warships deployed to the region. President Trump overnight green-lit a limited series of defensive strikes on Iranian targets on Qeshm Island in the Strait of Hormuz. asserted
Trump → expect → Hormuz
And American F-35C is seen preparing to launch from USS George Washington on Oct 30 US sailors departing an E-2D Hawkeye on the flight deck aircraft carrier USS George Washington on Oct 29 The island is strategically important. asserted
island → see → Oct
…and 14 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support