Photo via Daily Mail

Russell Brand's lawyer questions why victims did not 'scream more' when they were attacked as his father-in-law Bernard Gallacher accompanies him to court

Read the original at Daily Mail ↗
Cite

Camber, R. (2026, November 3). Russell Brand's lawyer questions why victims did not 'scream more' when they were attacked as his father-in-law Bernard Gallacher accompanies him to court. Daily Mail. https://www.dailymail.com/crime-desk/article-16259527/Russell-Brand-lawyer-attacked-father-Bernard-Gallacher-court.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Daily Mail · collected 2026-11-03 · by Rebecca Camber
Content note This article describes sexual violence.

Quick Summary

Russell Brand's lawyer, Ian Winter, KC, questioned why the accusers did not scream or resist during alleged rape incidents as he delivered his closing speech at Southwark Crown Court. The barrister suggested that it is implausible for a highly promiscuous individual like Brand to have raped just three women out of many voluntary sexual encounters over ten years and argued that the victims' delayed reporting indicates a lack of credibility. Bernard Gallacher, Brand's father-in-law and a Ryder Cup-winning golfer, supported Brand along with his wife Laura during the trial proceedings.
Written by AI on 2026-11-03, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On October 12, 2026, Russell Brand arrived at Southwark Crown Court in London for his trial on charges of rape and sexual assault. The comedian faces seven charges related to six women, with incidents alleged to have occurred between 1999 and 2009. Prosecutors described him as a "ruthless" sexual predator during the opening statements on October 14, detailing assaults in various locations including hotel rooms, workplaces, and public restrooms. Brand's defense team argues that reporting from 2023 about similar allegations poisoned the well of justice and led women to come forward years later, complicating the case against him.

Written for “Russell Brand Rape Trial Developments” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 102 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans strongly right (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans strongly right for article 124779 (high confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-11-03

Story

📰 Russell Brand Rape Trial Developments
Crime & Law · 103 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 30% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Guardian
Hedges 2 of 31 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different parts of Russell Brand's trial; Article A is about the prosecution's closing arguments, while Article B covers the defense's closing arguments.”
The Guardian
Hedges 2 of 33 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Guardian
Hedges 0 of 44 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A describes Russell Brand's wife giving testimony about their relationship and his previous promiscuity during his rape trial, while Article B reports on the defense lawyer questioning victims' behavior during alleged attacks in a different part of the same ongoing trial.”
Global News
Hedges 2 of 23 claims Outlet record 63/100
“Article A describes Russell Brand's wife testifying about his character during the trial, while Article B discusses Brand's lawyer's closing arguments questioning the credibility of the accusers' claims.”
Evening Standard
Hedges 3 of 28 claims Outlet record 64/100
Evening Standard
Hedges 4 of 33 claims Outlet record 64/100
BBC News
Hedges 3 of 26 claims Outlet record 68/100
Evening Standard
Hedges 2 of 14 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A discusses allegations poisoning the wells of justice, while Article B focuses on the defense lawyer's closing arguments questioning victims' actions during alleged attacks.”
BBC News
Hedges 1 of 27 claims Outlet record 68/100
“While both articles refer to Russell Brand's court case and the defense barrister Ian Winter KC, they describe different parts of the legal proceedings — one about how media coverage affected complaints, and another questioning victims' behavior during alleged attacks.”
Fox News
Hedges 4 of 36 claims Outlet record 69/100
“While both articles cover Russell Brand's rape trial, ARTICLE A describes Laura Brand's testimony as a defense witness, while ARTICLE B discusses the defense lawyer's closing arguments and questions to the jury.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
27
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
30%
8 of 27 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
69/100
Daily Mail's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
103
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-03 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Daily Mail · 8954 article(s) · 22 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 22 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Rebecca Camber
21 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 He obviously genuinely believed that they were consenting because that's the only thing that would explain why his behaviour was normal.'
🔮 She highlighted evidence from the entertainer's former personal assistant, Helen Berger, who said Brand was 'always in his underwear', and added: 'We suggest this demonstrates a disregard for professional boundaries.' Ms Karmy-Jones told jurors: 'We suggest you will be satisfied so you are sure that the six complainants told you the truth, not an invented truth, not a reimagined truth, but the real truth of what happened to them.
🔮 The 51-year-old comedian said it was 'wrong' that he had used his celebrity to 'facilitate sexual access', saying I 'dedicated a lot of my life to what seems now beyond reckless philandering and idiocy.' Giving evidence in his trial, the actor told Southwark Crown Court that he once enjoyed 'staggering fame', but allegations of rape and sexual assault meant no one would now 'touch him with a barge pole'. In an extraordinary appearance on the witness stand, the comedian once known for his verbosity appeared lost for words at times, stumbling in his explanations, his lips moving wordlessly before he haltingly answered questions about alleged attacks on six women.
🔮 Brand claimed he could not remember his accusers, but said it was possible they had 'consensual sexual activity or physical contact that has since been reimagined'.
🔮 Last night, the Sussexes said they still had a copy and offered to share it with police if officers could not locate it.
🔮 Brand then allegedly began texting and calling her, promising: 'I will hold you and help you'.
🔮 Describing Brand as 'average- not that well-endowed', she said: 'I thought if I did this, maybe he won't rape me.
🔮 Ms Karmy-Jones said: 'She remembers the weight of him on top of her, she couldn't move.
🔮 He could be nice when he wanted to be, funny, undoubtedly charming, likeable even when he wanted something in return.
🔮 The security alert, which comes weeks after a suspected terror plot at RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire, has raised suspicions that a hostile state may be seeking to exploit security concerns around bases used by the US.
Also by Rebecca Camber
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 21 articles by Rebecca Camber →

Topics

Channel 4's Ryder Cup Southwark Crown Court

Subjects

Brand PERSON · 10× Winter PERSON · 8× Bernard Gallacher PERSON · 2× Laura PERSON · 2× Channel 4's ORG · 1× Ian Winter PERSON · 1× Laura Brand PERSON · 1× Russell Brand PERSON · 1× Russell Brand's PERSON · 1× Southwark Crown Court ORG · 1×

Narrative

The comedian was accompanied to court by his wife Laura and father-in-law Bernard Gallacher, the Ryder Cup-winning golfer, in a show of support Russell Brand, accompanied by his wife Laura Brand, leaves Southwark Crown Court during the fourth week of his trial on charges of three counts of rape, three counts of sexual assault and one count of attempted indecent assault 'Not one person made a complaint of rape to him.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-03
🔮 He obviously genuinely believed that they were consenting because that's the only thing that would explain why his behaviour was normal.'

Claims (27 extracted, 8 hedged)

Russell Brand's barrister has asked his accusers why they did not 'kick and scream' more when they were allegedly raped by the actor. uncertain
they → ask → actor
Ian Winter, KC, today claimed Brand is not a 'psychopath that rapes people and thinks that is normal'. asserted
that → claim → people
He asked jurors to consider whether it was credible that the 'highly promiscuous' 51-year-old only attacked three women over ten years when he had 'an immense amount of sex'. asserted
he → ask → sex
In his defence closing speech, Mr Winter told jurors: 'The question for you is can you possibly be sure in this case that out of the many, many women who voluntarily had sex with Mr Brand between 1999 and 2009, he raped just three of them?' uncertain
he → close → them
He added: 'The prosecution do not have a case thesis as to why he raped these ones and none of the other ones?' asserted
he → add → ones
Mr Winter questioned why alleged victims did not come forward during the MeToo movement in 2017, suggesting the six women only reported the attacks after the public view of Brand was 'poisoned' by Channel 4's Dispatches programme, which broadcast claims of sexual misconduct in 2023. uncertain
which → question → 2023
Brand has been accused of three counts of rape, three sexual assaults and one count of attempted indecent assault, which he denies. asserted
he → accuse → which
On Monday, the comedian was accompanied to court by his wife Laura and father-in-law Bernard Gallacher, the Ryder Cup-winning golfer, in a show of support. asserted
comedian → accompany → support
The family sat quietly as Mr Winter told jurors they should disregard Brand's accusers because they didn't scream, kick, slap him or accuse him of rape. asserted
they → sit → rape
The comedian was accompanied to court by his wife Laura and father-in-law Bernard Gallacher, the Ryder Cup-winning golfer, in a show of support Russell Brand, accompanied by his wife Laura Brand, leaves Southwark Crown Court during the fourth week of his trial on charges of three counts of rape, three counts of sexual assault and one count of attempted indecent assault 'Not one person made a complaint of rape to him. asserted
person → accompany → him
There does not seem to be a credible reason why not,' he told jurors. asserted
he → seem → jurors
'Not one of them resisted or screamed or even tried to leave.' Mr Winter dismissed the account of one woman who claims she was dragged into the toilets of a bar in 2004, asking why a woman 'raped in the mouth' 'did not slap him in the face' after Brand leapt on a toilet seat and grabbed her head. uncertain
Brand → resist → head
The barrister also questioned why a 21-year-old fan allegedly raped in 2009 by the then 33-year-old star 'didn't just roll over and kick out'. uncertain
fan → question → star
Mr Winter said there was a 'problem' with the account of the first alleged rape victim who invited Brand to her room for a cup of tea after meeting him at a theatre show in 1999, mistakenly thinking he was gay and did not pose a threat. asserted
he → say → threat
'There is a real problem with her having invited him back to her bedroom. asserted
her → be → bedroom
She invited a stranger back to her bedroom. asserted
She → invite → bedroom
She fancied him. asserted
She → fancy → him
He is highly fanciable,' he said. asserted
he → say → ?
Mr Winter suggested the 28-year-old was not a 'naive and wilting flower' and Brand, then 24, was merely unsuccessful in pleasing her, adding: 'No person who has been raped can say their rapist was not trying to please them much.' The lawyer went on to advise jurors that it was 'inexplicable' that a fourth woman allegedly groped at a radio station in 2005 kept silent, adding: 'How is it remotely possible that in all the years of this incredible fame, his marriage to Katy Perry, that you never mentioned he jumped on you like a maniac behind the bins?' The family sat quietly as Mr Winter told jurors they should disregard Brand's accusers because they didn't scream, kick, slap him or accuse him of rape During their evidence alleged victims have described how 'normal' Brand seemed after the alleged attacks, but Mr Winter said: 'It's impossible for you to be raped and for you to think it is normal.' uncertain
it → suggest → attacks
He told jurors: 'There is no evidence that he is a psychopath that rapes people and thinks that is normal. asserted
that → tell → people
He obviously genuinely believed that they were consenting because that's the only thing that would explain why his behaviour was normal.' asserted
behaviour → believe → ?
He suggested his client may have been a 'crazy idiot' and treated women 'unkindly', leaving them with a phone number or email address shortly after sex. uncertain
client → suggest → sex
But he said Brand was only looking for 'approbation and adoration'. asserted
Brand → say → approbation
'Rapists do not leave their email address,' Mr Winter said. asserted
Winter → leave → address
'A rapist does not seek to exchange a phone number with a victim.' asserted
rapist → seek → victim
More than 30 times Mr Winter claimed the Dispatches programme had 'poisoned the well' of justice in Brand's case, suggesting that the victims had consented to Brand's advances, but the programme had 'corrupted' their views. asserted
programme → claim → views
He said jurors should acquit Brand adding: 'Living a highly promiscuous life is entirely lawful, however morally distasteful you may find it.' The trial continues. uncertain
trial → say → it
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support