Photo via New York Post

We challenged campus dogma on the ‘Cornell 7’ — and exposed Columbia’s free-speech hypocrisy

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Mohammadi, N., & Ma, C. (2026, November 3). We challenged campus dogma on the ‘Cornell 7’ — and exposed Columbia’s free-speech hypocrisy. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/11/02/opinion/we-challenged-campus-dogma-on-cornell-7-and-exposed-columbias-free-speech-hypocrisy/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-11-03 · by Nikos Mohammadi, Christina Ma

Quick Summary

At Columbia University, students who wrote an essay in the student magazine Columbia Sundial questioning campus dogma about the “Cornell 7” case faced a severe backlash. The essay argued that women have sexual agency and questioned the rush to judgment seen on social media and campuses. This prompted immediate condemnation from various progressive groups like the Columbia Political Review and the Open Discourse Alliance, which accused the authors of promoting rape culture and silencing survivors. Some colleagues within Sundial itself also resigned under pressure, reflecting a campus environment where certain viewpoints are not tolerated.
Written by AI on 2026-11-03, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Nikos Mohammadi and Christina Ma published an essay in the Columbia Sundial questioning campus dogma on the Cornell 7, a group of Cornell University fraternity members accused of sexual assault. The essay, which defended free speech and questioned the hyper-liberal stance on sex, sparked intense backlash from other students at culturally progressive Columbia University. They received hateful messages calling for them to kill themselves. Additionally, Columbia's editorial board criticized their article, claiming it "perpetuates a culture of campus violence," and urged the Sundial to review its publishing guidelines to prioritize public safety.

Written for “Cornell Seven Challenge” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.45, but all 5 of its quote(s) are attributed speech - words the article quotes from someone, not the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 124551: attributed speech only · logged 2026-11-03

Story

📰 Cornell Seven Challenge
Education · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
26
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
8%
2 of 26 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Education
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-03 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 16360 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Nikos Mohammadi
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 As students at culturally progressive Columbia University, we were well aware that the essay we published in our campus magazine questioning campus dogma on the notorious “Cornell 7” would evoke strong reactions.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.
Christina Ma
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 As students at culturally progressive Columbia University, we were well aware that the essay we published in our campus magazine questioning campus dogma on the notorious “Cornell 7” would evoke strong reactions.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Columbia University Cornell 7 Instagram Sundial the Columbia Sundial

Subjects

Sundial ORG · 3× Instagram ORG · 2× Columbia ORG · 1× Columbia Political Review ORG · 1× Columbia University ORG · 1× FIRE ORG · 1× Morningside Heights GPE · 1× The Columbia Open Discourse Alliance ORG · 1× the Columbia Sundial ORG · 1× the Cornell 7 ORG · 1×

Narrative

Its editorial board condemned us within hours of publication, saying our words “perpetuate a culture of campus violence, rape and assault.” It called on the Sundial to “formally re-evaluate their publishing guidelines and their commitment to public safety.” The Columbia Open Discourse Alliance chimed in — oh, but not to defend us.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-03
🔮 As students at culturally progressive Columbia University, we were well aware that the essay we published in our campus magazine questioning campus dogma on the notorious “Cornell 7” would evoke strong reactions.

Claims (26 extracted, 2 hedged)

The hateful messages started pouring in, one after another. asserted
messages → pour → another
“I hope [you] are shown the same cruelty you carry in your heart for someone you don’t even know.” asserted
you → hope → someone
“Brother you gotta kill yourself.” asserted
you → got → yourself
As students at culturally progressive Columbia University, we were well aware that the essay we published in our campus magazine questioning campus dogma on the notorious “Cornell 7” would evoke strong reactions. asserted
we → publish → reactions
But we didn’t foresee the scale and ferocity of the backlash — or how many of our own “allies” in the fight to champion freer discourse and dialogue on campus would join in. asserted
many → foresee → campus
Here’s a taste of what we argued last month in the Columbia Sundial, an independent student magazine expressly founded to present new and even uncomfortable ideas to the general student body: asserted
we → ’ → body
“The sexual revolution created a hyper-liberal, pro-sex culture that insists that ‘women can do whatever they want with their bodies’ . . . we cannot claim to stand for sexual freedom and then recoil in disgust when there’s a possibility that a young woman simply chose to exercise it.” That, apparently, is something you’re just not allowed to say at an Ivy League institution dedicated to “higher learning. uncertain
you → create → learning
Not even if you’re a journal dedicated to “multipartisan ideas, including those that may be controversial,” as the student-run Columbia Political Review claims to be. uncertain
Review → ’re → those
Its editorial board condemned us within hours of publication, saying our words “perpetuate a culture of campus violence, rape and assault.” It called on the Sundial to “formally re-evaluate their publishing guidelines and their commitment to public safety.” The Columbia Open Discourse Alliance chimed in — oh, but not to defend us. asserted
Alliance → condemn → us
Instead its board attacked, well, the very reason for its organization’s existence. asserted
board → attack → existence
“Open discourse requires that every member of our community be able to speak,” the group declared on Instagram. asserted
group → require → Instagram
“This article does the opposite: it promotes rape culture and works to silence survivors of sexual assault. asserted
it → do → assault
Of course, the alliance’s board didn’t care to define “rape culture,” or explain how exactly our essay — containing ideas well within the bounds of the national discourse — was “not a contribution to debate.” asserted
essay → care → debate
No, in Morningside Heights, it seems that having a particular take on the Cornell 7 — one that contends women have agency, calls for exercising reasonable scrutiny, and criticizes the social-media and campus frenzy — can only “promote rape culture” and “silence survivors of sexual assault.” asserted
women → seem → assault
Within the Sundial itself, we watched as some colleagues folded to the peer pressure. asserted
colleagues → watch → pressure
They circulated an Instagram petition demanding that the magazine “cease . . . all organizational operations” until it made amends, leaked their (often less than factually accurate) fury to the campus press on two separate occasions, and finally resigned. asserted
it → circulate → occasions
Perhaps they did so out of sheer conviction. asserted
they → do → conviction
Maybe it’s just that they really, really hated our piece. But it’s also a fact that some of these Sundial staffers had privately expressed support for the essay prior to its publication, or had been neutral on it — and only turned against it once friends and acquaintances began harassing them for their affiliation with us. asserted
friends → hat → us
We can even understand why they’d flip. asserted
they → understand → ?
Columbia’s F grade on FIRE’s annual College Free Speech Rankings report is well earned — and our “allies” in the open-discourse space are now swimming with the tide. asserted
allies → earn → tide
The threat of losing staff, and the overwhelming extent of the vitriol leveled against us, clearly gave them strong incentive to join the campus mob. asserted
threat → lose → mob
All this because we called into question the liberal culture that encourages depraved acts for their own sake — and that turns on a dime when the culture itself produces painful results. asserted
culture → call → results
When that occurs, we’re told that adult women have no agency — and can retroactively hold men responsible for acts which, in hindsight, were traumatic and unwanted. asserted
which → occur → hindsight
The collective “I am Jane Doe” frenzy, we maintained, had “ushered in a climate on campus in which it is difficult to disagree with the maximalist position on what happened on Oct. 19 and Oct. 20, 2024, to one ‘Jane Doe’ at Cornell’s Chi Phi frat house.” asserted
what → maintain → house
Our critics proved us right. We struck a nerve, and it’s now clear where the self-proclaimed free-speech enthusiasts on our campus really stand. asserted
enthusiasts → prove → campus
We’ve come to learn where the boundaries of our university’s “intellectualism” lie — and just how constrained they really are. asserted
they → come → intellectualism
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support