Photo via Al Jazeera

What is ranked-choice voting and how does it work in US elections?

Read the original at Al Jazeera ↗
Cite

Al Jazeera Staff. (2026, October 31). What is ranked-choice voting and how does it work in US elections? Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/10/31/what-is-ranked-choice-voting-and-how-does-it-work-in-us-elections?traffic_source=rss

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Al Jazeera · collected 2026-10-31 · by Al Jazeera Staff

Quick Summary

The article discusses ranked-choice voting, a system used in Alaska and Maine where voters rank candidates by preference rather than selecting just one choice. If no candidate receives over 50% of first-choice votes, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated, and their supporters' next choices are considered until a winner emerges with a majority. The piece outlines both the benefits—such as increased voter freedom and reduced spoiler effects—and potential downsides like complexity in voting and counting, which could delay results.
Written by AI on 2026-11-01, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In Alaska, a controversy has emerged over whether two Senate candidates with similar names will cancel each other out due to ranked-choice voting. This system, used only by Alaska and Maine among US states, allows voters to rank their preferred candidates in order rather than selecting just one. If no candidate wins a majority of the first-choice votes, subsequent rounds count second choices until a winner emerges. The concern is that this could dilute support for either candidate, affecting the outcome of the closely watched Senate race ahead of the November 3 midterm elections.

Written for “Ranked-Choice Voting Explained” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 120181 · logged 2026-11-01

Story

📰 Ranked-Choice Voting Explained
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 18% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 2 of 7 claims Outlet record 70/100
“Article A discusses a specific cheating incident involving decoy candidates, while Article B provides an overview of ranked choice voting in response to the controversy but does not focus on the same specific occurrence.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
49
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
18%
9 of 49 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
60/100
Al Jazeera's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-01 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Al Jazeera · 4571 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Al Jazeera Staff
797 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 All of them will receive the assistance they need,” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy wrote on X, thanking the United States and the first lady for mediating.
🔮 According to the statement, the assets are expected to be “further laundered” in stages.
2026-11-01 · assertive framing · FBI blames North Korea for record $6.3bn crypto heist
🔮 Protesters at Saturday’s rally told the AFP news agency this may be the “last chance for real change” and that Netanyahu, Israel’s longest-serving prime minister, is a “great manipulator”.
🔮 In 2019, he faced federal charges related to sex trafficking, but he was found dead in his New York City jail cell before he could be brought to trial.
🔮 Dutch authorities will open an investigation into the case on Sunday.
🔮 The lawsuit is unfolding in the final days before Tuesday’s pivotal midterm elections, which will decide which party controls the US Congress, as well as key state and local offices.
🔮 The current outbreak emerged in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) in May.
🔮 Otherwise, the lawsuit warns, Trump could claim that pausing construction already under way would pose a national security risk, as he has done with other controversial projects in the past.
🔮 In Alaska, a controversy is unfolding over whether two Senate candidates with roughly the same name will cancel each other out.
🔮 Demonstrators in both London and Edinburgh could be seen holding placards reading “I oppose genocide.
Wire or desk byline, not an individual reporter.
Also by Al Jazeera Staff
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 797 articles by Al Jazeera Staff →

Topics

3Iranians Alaska Israeli Senate the United States

Subjects

Alaska GPE · 7× Senate ORG · 4× Maine GPE · 3× the United States GPE · 2× 3Iranians NORP · 1× Dan Sullivan PERSON · 1× Israeli NORP · 1× New York GPE · 1× Political Behavior ORG · 1× Trump PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Recommended Stories list of 3 items- list 1 of 3Iranians brace for renewed attacks after Israeli, US elections - list 2 of 3‘If they’re honest’: Trump casts latest suspicion on US midterm elections - list 3 of 3Hackers target US campaign finance system days before midterm elections
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-01
🔮 In Alaska, a controversy is unfolding over whether two Senate candidates with roughly the same name will cancel each other out.
2026-11-01 · Al Jazeera
What is ranked-choice voting and how does it work in US elections? · assertive framing

Claims (49 extracted, 9 hedged)

In Alaska, a controversy is unfolding over whether two Senate candidates with roughly the same name will cancel each other out. asserted
candidates → unfold → other
The debate has shone a spotlight on a relatively uncommon style of voting in the United States: a system known as “ranked choice”. asserted
debate → shine → choice
Recommended Stories list of 3 items- list 1 of 3Iranians brace for renewed attacks after Israeli, US elections - list 2 of 3‘If they’re honest’: Trump casts latest suspicion on US midterm elections - list 3 of 3Hackers target US campaign finance system days before midterm elections asserted
Trump → brace → elections
Only two states in the United States — Alaska and Maine — employ ranked-choice voting throughout their territory, though major cities like New York have also embraced the practice. asserted
cities → employ → practice
Ranked-choice ballots allow voters to rank candidates in order of preference, rather than choosing just one. asserted
voters → rank → one
If a voter’s first choice does not win a majority, their vote can be transferred to their second pick. asserted
vote → win → pick
With US midterm elections set for November 3, ranked-choice voting could play a role in closely watched races, including the Alaska Senate battle. uncertain
voting → set → battle
Here’s a guide on how ranked-choice voting works in the US: asserted
voting → ’ → US
What are the benefits of ranked-choice voting? asserted
benefits → rank → voting
Proponents of ranked-choice voting believe the practice frees voters from the pressure of having to vote pragmatically. asserted
practice → rank → pressure
They no longer have to cast their ballot based on the candidate most likely to win. asserted
They → have → candidate
Instead, supporters say that ranked-choice voting allows people to support the candidate they prefer the most, without the fear of “wasting” their vote should that candidate prove to be unpopular. asserted
candidate → say → vote
Advocates for ranked-choice voting also argue that the system reduces the spoiler effect, whereby a third-party or lesser-known candidate draws votes from a similar major-party candidate. asserted
candidate → rank → candidate
They also frame the system as a boon for democracy, by encouraging more diverse viewpoints to compete in elections and offering an incentive for candidates to work together. asserted
candidates → frame → incentive
Critics argue that ranked-choice ballots make voting and vote-counting more complicated. asserted
voting → argue → ?
They also fear it could slow down the tallying of election results, undermining confidence in the outcome. uncertain
it → fear → outcome
A 2025 study published in the journal Political Behavior cited data suggesting that 4.8 percent of ranked-choice ballots are “improperly marked” — though it clarified that not all of those ballots are invalidated as a result. asserted
all → publish → result
How does ranked-choice voting work? asserted
voting → rank → ?
On a ranked-choice ballot, voters get to number their candidates in order of preference. asserted
voters → rank → preference
If their first choice doesn’t win, their vote automatically counts for their next choice instead. asserted
vote → win → choice
If one candidate receives more than 50 percent of first-choice votes, that candidate wins. asserted
candidate → receive → votes
If no candidate secures a majority, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated. asserted
candidate → secure → votes
Ballots for that candidate are redistributed to voters’ next-ranked choices, and the votes are tallied again. asserted
votes → redistribute → choices
This continues until a candidate wins a majority of votes still counted in the final round. asserted
candidate → continue → round
If a voter ranks only one candidate and that candidate is eliminated, their ballot cannot transfer to another candidate. asserted
ballot → rank → candidate
Unlike a traditional runoff election, which requires voters to return to the polls, ranked-choice voting can determine a winner through successive rounds of counting in a single election. asserted
voting → require → election
Why do Alaska and Maine use ranked-choice voting? asserted
Alaska → use → voting
Maine adopted ranked-choice voting in 2016 after concerns emerged about candidates winning elections without majority support. asserted
candidates → adopt → support
It first used the system in congressional elections in 2018. asserted
It → use → 2018
Alaska voters approved the system through a 2020 ballot initiative. asserted
voters → approve → initiative
The state uses open primaries in which all candidates compete, with the top four advancing to a general election decided by ranked-choice voting. asserted
four → use → voting
Will ranked-choice voting affect Alaska’s Senate race? asserted
voting → rank → race
Alaska’s ranked-choice voting system could come under scrutiny in this year’s Senate race, where two candidates named Dan Sullivan appear on the ballot. uncertain
candidates → rank → ballot
The potential for voter confusion raises questions about whether some voters could accidentally rank the wrong candidate, potentially affecting how votes are distributed in successive rounds of ballot-counting. uncertain
votes → raise → counting
State officials have taken steps to differentiate the two Sullivans on the ballot. asserted
officials → take → ballot
The incumbent, Senator Dan S Sullivan, is listed as a registered Republican and the incumbent, while his challenger, retired teacher Daniel J Sullivan Jr, has no party identification next to his name. asserted
challenger → list → name
Still, the teacher’s inclusion has been the source of ongoing controversy, particularly in the wake of a New York Times report signalling he may have been recruited by Democrats as a spoiler candidate. uncertain
he → signal → candidate
Republicans have raised concerns that having two Sullivans on the ballot could confuse voters and draw support away from the senator. uncertain
having → raise → senator
The teacher, meanwhile, has said his candidacy is genuine. asserted
candidacy → say → ?
In June, the Alaska Supreme Court allowed the vote to proceed with the participation of both Sullivans. asserted
vote → allow → Sullivans
…and 9 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support