Warner Bros killed Coyote vs. Acme, but now it's back

ABC News (AU) · collected 2026-09-15 · by Matt Neal
Read the original at ABC News (AU) ↗

Summary

Warner Bros originally planned to release the animated comedy film "Coyote vs. Acme" in July 2023 but scrapped it without screening despite its completion and positive test screenings. This decision, made by executives who had not seen the finished product, was part of a trend where Warner Bros shelved completed films like Batgirl and Scoob! Holiday Haunt to avoid additional marketing costs, turning them into tax write-offs. The article explores why such decisions are made in Hollywood despite audience reception and artistic merit.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-16, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
32
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
19%
6 of 32 hedged
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Correction & hedging signals
60.1
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
1
Entertainment
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-16 · source text last changed 2026-09-16 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

Warner Bros. initially shelved Coyote vs. Acme, a Looney Tunes spin-off film featuring Wile E. Coyote's legal battle against Acme Corporation. Despite Warner Bros.' decision to cancel it, the filmmakers persisted and garnered public support online and through social media efforts by the cast and crew. On March 31, 2025, indie distributor Ketchup Entertainment acquired the rights to release the film, aiming for a 2026 debut in Australian cinemas. The movie combines animated characters with live actors like Will Forte and John Cena, blending comedy and legal drama similar to "Who Framed Roger Rabbit?" This resurrection of the film is significant as it represents a rare comeback for an abandoned project, making its release highly anticipated.

Written for “Looney Tunes Project Cancellation Rev…” on 2026-09-17, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 11993 · logged 2026-09-16

Story

📰 Looney Tunes Project Cancellation Rev…
Entertainment · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.

Publisher

ABC News (AU) · 453 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)
2026-09-15
Canberra man posed as teenage girl to obtain child abuse material
2026-09-07
'Her career's finished': Fugitive Sydney developer's daughter avoids jail

Who wrote this

Matt Neal
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 This week, Coyote vs. Acme will conclude its long journey to Aussie cinemas, having previously looked deader than a cartoon coyote trapped under a comically oversized boulder. So how did this Looney Tunes spin-off finally make it to the big screen, and why is its resurrection such a big deal?
2026-09-15 · assertive framing · Warner Bros killed Coyote vs. Acme, but now it's back
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Acme Aussie Hollywood Warner Bros Warner Bros.

Subjects

Coyote PERSON · 5× Acme ORG · 4× Warner Bros ORG · 3× Warner Bros. ORG · 3× Hollywood GPE · 2× Wile E. Coyote PERSON · 2× Aussie NORP · 1× John Cena PERSON · 1× New Yorker ORG · 1× Will Forte PERSON · 1×

Narrative

The implication from The Wrap was that if they didn't make a deal, the studio would "unceremoniously delete (Coyote vs. Acme) … never to be seen again". But somehow, the filmmakers persevered, and the film endured, spurred on by the continuous online burblings, public statements by the cast and crew, and a growing mystique around this "lost" movie. Finally, on March 31, 2025, Deadline reported that indie distributor Ketchup Entertainment had bought Coyote vs. Acme, with the aim of a 2026 release.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-16
🔮 This week, Coyote vs. Acme will conclude its long journey to Aussie cinemas, having previously looked deader than a cartoon coyote trapped under a comically oversized boulder. So how did this Looney Tunes spin-off finally make it to the big screen, and why is its resurrection such a big deal?
2026-09-16 · ABC News (AU)
Warner Bros killed Coyote vs. Acme, but now it's back · assertive framing

Claims (32 extracted, 6 hedged)

Films can be left unfinished or unreleased for a variety of reasons, but it's rare for one to come back from the dead. asserted
one → leave → dead
This week, Coyote vs. Acme will conclude its long journey to Aussie cinemas, having previously looked deader than a cartoon coyote trapped under a comically oversized boulder. So how did this Looney Tunes spin-off finally make it to the big screen, and why is its resurrection such a big deal? asserted
resurrection → conclude → screen
The film tells the story of the down-on-his-luck animated carnivore Wile E. Coyote and his legal battle with Acme, whose products have repeatedly failed him in his quest to catch his nemesis, the Road Runner. asserted
products → tell → nemesis
The comedy combines its Looney Tunes stars with a flesh-and-blood cast, including Will Forte and John Cena, in a style reminiscent of the semi-animated film noir classic Who Framed Roger Rabbit? asserted
Who → combine → Rabbit
The real-world spin on the failures of Wile E. Coyote stems from a spoof New Yorker article from 1990 by Ian Frazier, in which he imagines Mr Coyote launching a civil suit against Acme seeking just over $US38 million in damages and compensation for "personal injuries, loss of business income, and mental suffering caused as a direct result of the actions and/or gross negligence of said company". asserted
Coyote → stem → company
So, what happened to the film? asserted
what → happen → film
Dave Green (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Out of the Shadows) signed on as director in late 2019, and Coyote vs. Acme began filming the live-action scenes in early 2022. asserted
Coyote → sign → 2022
British special effects house DNEG, which also worked on Denis Villeneuve's Dune trilogy, began work on the film's hybrid 2D and 3D animation effects, and the film was set for a July 21, 2023, release. asserted
film → work → release
The film studio Warner Bros quietly handed that release date off to Barbie instead, and Coyote vs. Acme languished on the shelf. asserted
Acme → hand → shelf
Then on November 9, 2023, Warner Bros announced that even though the film was finished, it had no plans ever to release it. asserted
it → announce → it
According to a Deadline.com article from the time, Warner Bros. execs decided that rather than shell out another $US40 million ($55.7 million) to promote the $US70 million film, they'd cut their losses and ditch it as a $US30 million tax write-off. uncertain
they → accord → off
What was most perplexing, aside from the fact the movie was scrapped despite already being finished, was that it had been shown at test screenings where audiences had responded positively to it. asserted
audiences → scrap → it
It was the third time Warner Bros. had done this, having also shelved the DC superhero outing Batgirl and the animated Scooby-Doo prequel Scoob! Holiday Haunt in August 2022, although both those films were unfinished. asserted
films → do → August
Perhaps most damningly, according to Hollywood industry website The Wrap, the four Warner executives responsible for axing Coyote vs. Acme "hadn't even seen the finished version of the movie", noting the film had been "greenlit by a previous regime". uncertain
film → accord → regime
Burying films made by a studio's former heads is a classic Hollywood move. asserted
Burying → bury → heads
Back in 1988, Terry Gilliam's underrated The Adventures of Baron Munchausen scored glowing reviews and four Oscar nominations but became the biggest box office bomb of all time, purely because the new heads at Columbia Studios buried and under-promoted the film's release as revenge against their predecessors (and Gilliam). asserted
heads → score → predecessors
But axing a completed film as a tax write-off was something totally new. asserted
axing → ax → off
The cast and crew of Coyote vs. Acme were blindsided and outraged by the decision to ditch the film. asserted
cast → blindside → film
Composer Steven Price called the move "bizarre anti-art studio financial shenanigans I will never understand", while another crew member described it to Rolling Stone as "deflating and frustrating". asserted
member → call → Stone
Other creatives suggested they would think twice about working with Warner Bros., with some reportedly cancelling meetings with the studio. uncertain
some → suggest → studio
The internet, as usual, was angry — cue the obligatory hashtags (#ReleaseCoyoteVsAcme and #SaveCoyoteVsAcme). asserted
internet → cue → hashtags
The outrage was short and sharp, and within four days, Warner Bros had relented somewhat, instead agreeing to let the filmmakers shop the film around to find a new distributor. asserted
filmmakers → relent → distributor
After several months of Warner Bros rejecting suitors (including Netflix, Paramount and Amazon), there were fears the studio's backflip was a ruse. asserted
backflip → reject → Netflix
The Wrap reported Warner Bros had called the film's producers and suggested they better find a buyer soon (despite Warner being in charge of the price and the rejections). uncertain
Warner → report → price
The implication from The Wrap was that if they didn't make a deal, the studio would "unceremoniously delete (Coyote vs. Acme) … never to be seen again". But somehow, the filmmakers persevered, and the film endured, spurred on by the continuous online burblings, public statements by the cast and crew, and a growing mystique around this "lost" movie. Finally, on March 31, 2025, Deadline reported that indie distributor Ketchup Entertainment had bought Coyote vs. Acme, with the aim of a 2026 release. asserted
Entertainment → make → release
That's all, folks The saga has proven to be a monumental PR misfire for Warner Bros., and better publicity than money could buy. While far from a runaway blockbuster, it's already made more money than Warner Bros intended to recoup from its tax write-off manoeuvre. The film has grossed $US65 million worldwide, including close to $50 million in the US, and has yet to roll out in many countries. Ahead of its US opening, critic aggregator Rotten Tomatoes has the film at a remarkable 96 per cent "Fresh" rating from 264 reviews (for comparison, Toy Story 5 is 93 per cent "Fresh" from about 320 reviews). uncertain
Story → prove → reviews
Australian audiences will get their opportunity to see what all the fuss is about this week. asserted
fuss → get → what
But in the end, it seems Wile E. Coyote has finally achieved something he never could in the old Looney Tunes cartoons — a win. uncertain
he → seem → cartoons
And perhaps the film has extra resonance now, because of its struggles. asserted
film → have → struggles
As the film's editor, Carsten Kurpanek, put it, maybe Warner Bros. weren't worried about the film bombing, but about its message. asserted
Bros. → put → message
"#CoyoteVsAcme is about a giant corporation choosing stock over empathy, doing nothing 'illegal' but morally shady stuff for profit," Kurpanek tweeted. asserted
Kurpanek → choose → profit
"No wonder Warner (didn't) want to #releasecoyoteVsACME." asserted
Warner → want → ?
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support