The Aporia
Peng, D. (2026, October 31). Mao vs Rao: Cell Press probe clears editor but Chinese biologist keeps up pressure. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3372707/mao-vs-rao-cell-press-probe-clears-editor-chinese-biologist-keeps-pressure
Peng, Dannie. “Mao vs Rao: Cell Press probe clears editor but Chinese biologist keeps up pressure.” South China Morning Post, 31 Oct. 2026, https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3372707/mao-vs-rao-cell-press-probe-clears-editor-chinese-biologist-keeps-pressure.
Peng, Dannie. “Mao vs Rao: Cell Press probe clears editor but Chinese biologist keeps up pressure.” South China Morning Post, October 31, 2026. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3372707/mao-vs-rao-cell-press-probe-clears-editor-chinese-biologist-keeps-pressure.
Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.
As of October 31, 2026, Cell Press has concluded its investigation into allegations against the editor-in-chief of its journal Cancer Cell, finding no evidence to support claims of bribery or misconduct. The publisher, owned by Elsevier, stated that their probe had "largely concluded" with no supporting evidence for the accusations made by Chinese biologist Rao from Peking University. Despite this outcome, Rao continues to pressure for the editor's resignation, threatening legal action if his demands are not met. Rao stepped down as president of Capital Medical University last year but remains a tenured chair professor at Peking University.