Photo via New York Post

Gavin Newsom shown up by judge for secret order to ban key energy resource in California

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Swaim, W. (2026, October 31). Gavin Newsom shown up by judge for secret order to ban key energy resource in California. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/10/30/opinion/gavin-newsom-shown-up-by-judge-for-secret-order-to-ban-fracking/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-10-31 · by Will Swaim

Quick Summary

Judge Bernard Barmann Jr. invalidated Governor Gavin Newsom’s secret statewide fracking ban in California, ruling against both the informal prohibition implemented in 2021 and the formal regulation adopted in 2024. The court found that Newsom's administration had bypassed legal procedures by imposing a de facto ban without public rulemaking as required by state law. This decision highlights the controversial and secretive methods used by the California government to restrict oil production, leading to higher gasoline prices for residents.
Written by AI on 2026-10-31, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of October 31, 2026, Superior Court Judge Bernard Barmann Jr. invalidated a secret statewide fracking ban imposed by California Governor Gavin Newsom's administration in 2021 and a formal regulation adopted in 2024, in an Oct. 8 tentative ruling. This ruling rebukes Newsom’s anti-energy efforts that had been criticized for being secretive and contradicting earlier environmental justifications provided by the state. The ban initially faced legislative opposition but was implemented despite the governor's previous public statements that he lacked legal authority to impose a fracking moratorium unilaterally. The judge's decision underscores the arbitrary nature of California's energy policy and highlights the administration’s controversial approach to regulating oil production in the state, impacting Kern County significantly.

Written for “Gavin Newsom Upstaged By Judge Over Energy Ban” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans right (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans right for article 118742 (high confidence, 3 verified quotes) · logged 2026-10-31

Story

📰 Gavin Newsom Upstaged By Judge Over Energy Ban
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 9% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Los Angeles Times
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 10 of 55 claims Outlet record 95/100
“The articles discuss different topics related to California politics and energy policy but do not describe the same specific incident.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
46
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
9%
4 of 46 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-31 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 15490 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Will Swaim
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 In his whistleblower lawsuit, he said he would have approved most of the fracking applications but for direction originating with the governor’s office.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

CalGEM California Kern County Newsom Superior Court

Subjects

Newsom PERSON · 7× CalGEM ORG · 5× California GPE · 3× Aera Energy ORG · 2× Barmann PERSON · 2× Californians NORP · 2× Chevron ORG · 2× Kern County GPE · 2× Ntuk PERSON · 2× Superior Court ORG · 2×

Narrative

Now a Kern County judge has delivered a rebuke to one of his administration’s most brazen anti-energy schemes: It secretly imposed a statewide fracking ban, denied its existence for years, then invoked environmental justifications contradicted by its own earlier findings.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-31
🔮 In his whistleblower lawsuit, he said he would have approved most of the fracking applications but for direction originating with the governor’s office.

Claims (46 extracted, 4 hedged)

Gov. Gavin Newsom has spent years making it harder to produce oil in his state, and Californians are picking up the tab in the form of America’s highest gasoline prices. asserted
Californians → spend → prices
Now a Kern County judge has delivered a rebuke to one of his administration’s most brazen anti-energy schemes: It secretly imposed a statewide fracking ban, denied its existence for years, then invoked environmental justifications contradicted by its own earlier findings. asserted
It → deliver → findings
In an Oct. 8 tentative ruling, Superior Court Judge Bernard Barmann Jr. invalidated both the administration’s secret prohibition on fracking, imposed in 2021, and the formal regulation adopted in 2024. asserted
Jr. → invalidate → 2024
The story begins in 2019, when Newsom told disappointed supporters that he lacked authority to impose a fracking moratorium. asserted
he → begin → moratorium
“You can’t do that unilaterally,” he said. asserted
he → do → that
The governor of California cannot do that.” asserted
governor → do → that
Apparently, he reconsidered. asserted
he → reconsider → ?
In 2021, after legislation to ban fracking failed in a Democrat-controlled Senate committee, Newsom’s office quietly directed the California Geologic Energy Management Division, or CalGEM, to stop approving well-stimulation permits. asserted
office → ban → permits
But getting his regulators to carry out his order was another matter. asserted
regulators → get → order
In 2019, Newsom fired state oil and gas supervisor Ken Harris amid complaints that his agency had approved too many fracking permits. asserted
agency → fire → permits
Harris’ replacement, Uduak-Joe Ntuk, continued evaluating applications, approving 83 well-stimulation permits in 2020 while denying 57. asserted
replacement → continue → 57
Even after Newsom announced plans to ban fracking, Ntuk’s agency approved another 12 permits in 2021. asserted
agency → announce → 2021
That changed in July 2021, when CalGEM began categorically denying applications rather than evaluating each on its merits. asserted
CalGEM → change → merits
Ntuk departed in 2023 and alleged that the Newsom administration had forced him out. asserted
administration → depart → him
In his whistleblower lawsuit, he said he would have approved most of the fracking applications but for direction originating with the governor’s office. asserted
he → say → office
He claimed the administration had forced him out for resisting the governor’s order on fracking and other state regulations limiting oil recovery. asserted
administration → claim → recovery
His lawsuit was dismissed, and he has appealed. asserted
he → dismiss → ?
Chevron and Aera Energy filed suit in Kern County Superior Court in March 2022, challenging CalGEM’s rejection of their well-stimulation applications. asserted
Chevron → file → applications
According to Chevron and Aera Energy’s suit, the agency had stopped making the legally mandated review of individual applications, instead relying on an unlawful blanket protection. uncertain
agency → accord → protection
This was imposed without the public rulemaking process demanded by the state’s Administrative Procedure Act. asserted
This → impose → Act
For two years, the administration denied the existence of any such prohibition. asserted
administration → deny → prohibition
Its lawyers asserted that allegations of a ban were “hyperbole and speculation.” asserted
allegations → assert → ban
An extraordinary admission followed. asserted
admission → follow → ?
In October 2024, CalGEM admitted that it had imposed a shadow ban to avoid the legally required rulemaking process. asserted
it → admit → process
Judge Barmann found that the explanations given to applicants weren’t the actual basis for rejecting their permits. asserted
explanations → find → permits
As grounds for denying individual applications, the administration had invoked climate change and public health. asserted
administration → deny → change
At the same time, the decision was to deny all applications, regardless of their merits. asserted
decision → deny → merits
As Barmann concluded, the permit denials were “arbitrary and unsupported” because they rested on a climate-change rationale that wasn’t the actual basis for the ban. asserted
that → conclude → ban
The administration’s subsequent attempt to legalize its prohibition proved little more defensible. asserted
attempt → legalize → prohibition
In 2024, CalGEM formally banned well stimulation, claiming the measure was necessary to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions. asserted
measure → ban → emissions
For Newsom, its conclusions would prove inconvenient. asserted
conclusions → prove → Newsom
A statewide moratorium would reduce oil production in California, the agency determined, but it wouldn’t eliminate Californians’ need for petroleum in the first place. asserted
it → reduce → place
Instead, the state would need to buy more oil from foreign producers and out-of-state suppliers — and many of these imported oil came from countries or states that much less stringent environmental controls. asserted
many → need → controls
One scenario modeled by the report suggested that roughly 57 million barrels would have to be replaced every year. uncertain
barrels → model → report
Much of that oil would have to be transported by tankers or rail, adding further costs and environmental impacts to those associated with extraction elsewhere. asserted
Much → have → extraction
Unlike an oil-industry study that Newsom’s regulators could dismiss, this was the state government’s own environmental analysis. uncertain
this → dismiss → that
As Judge Barmann put it, CalGEM’s determination that a categorical ban was reasonably necessary to reduce greenhouse gases “is not supported by substantial evidence and lacks a rational connection to that purpose.” asserted
ban → put → purpose
He therefore vacated the regulation. asserted
He → vacate → regulation
Toward the end of September, as gasoline prices skyrocketed, Newsom temporarily suspended California’s summer-blend gas requirement, allowing the cheaper winter blend to enter the market early. asserted
blend → skyrocket → market
His administration touted the decision as relief — a welcome reprieve from President Trump’s gasoline-price crisis. asserted
administration → tout → crisis
…and 6 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support