Short Circuit: An inexhaustive weekly compendium of rulings from the federal courts of appeal

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Ross, J. (2026, October 30). Short Circuit: An inexhaustive weekly compendium of rulings from the federal courts of appeal. Reason. https://reason.com/volokh/2026/10/30/short-circuit-an-inexhaustive-weekly-compendium-of-rulings-from-the-federal-courts-of-appeal-83/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Reason · collected 2026-10-30 · by John Ross analysis

Quick Summary

Short Circuit is a weekly feature by the Institute for Justice that compiles rulings from federal courts of appeal. This edition covers topics such as election law issues, challenges against data privacy practices like automated license plate readers, and cases involving false arrest claims against officers after sobriety tests. It also includes decisions on qualified immunity in various contexts, restrictions on address disclosure for public officials to protect them from harassment, and constitutional questions regarding the detention of undocumented immigrants during deportation proceedings.
Written by AI on 2026-10-30, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In a recent court case involving Steven Bailey, DEA and CBP agents seized nearly $1.4 million in cash from him and his small currency wholesaling business last year during two separate airport seizures. The Institute for Justice (IJ) is representing Bailey, who claims that the transactions were legitimate and compliant with regulations, including buying U.S. dollars in Mexico and bringing them back to the United States. Reason Magazine reported on this case as part of its "Short Circuit" feature covering federal court rulings.

Written for “Federal Court Rulings Compendium” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 118318 · logged 2026-10-30

Story

📰 Federal Court Rulings Compendium
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
47
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
4%
2 of 47 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
67/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-30 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 1036 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

John Ross
8 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 So maybe he was telling the truth about pulling over for a nap while business was slow?
🔮 - One response to our embittered, social-media-coarsened discourse might be to take a deep breath and focus on the important things.
🔮 Many would consider that just a difference of opinion; but for litigious lobstermen, it's supposedly defamation.
🔮 The first two trains will be built in Germany with American workers on hand for training—and then eight more Made in America.
🔮 "Technology may make surveillance more convenient, but it does not make the Fourth Amendment's protections any less important."
🔮 Might be a Fourth Amendment violation if the officials searched the home based only on a vague unsubstantiated complaint, but qualified immunity for substantive and procedural due process claims.
🔮 A former mayor even scrapped planned upgrades.
🔮 - In which the Third Circuit holds that restrictions on out-of-state doctors' telemedicine practice are content-based restrictions on speech that would be subject to strict scrutiny … if not for the Founding-era history of gov't licensing of physician speech, which is hard cheese for the plaintiff physicians.
Also by John Ross
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 8 articles by John Ross →

Topics

D.C. Circuit DHS First Circuit Short Circuit the Institute for Justice

Subjects

Rooker PERSON · 2× Short Circuit ORG · 2× Supreme Court ORG · 2× Brookhaven GPE · 1× D.C. Circuit ORG · 1× DHS ORG · 1× First Circuit ORG · 1× J. Walker PERSON · 1× Uber ORG · 1× the Institute for Justice ORG · 1×

Narrative

Last year, in two separate airport seizures, DEA and CBP agents seized a total of nearly $1.4 mil in cash from IJ client Steven Bailey and his small currency wholesaling business, which, among other things, buys U.S. dollars in Mexico and brings them back to the states—all above board and in compliance with numerous federal rules and reporting requirements.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-30
🔮 So maybe he was telling the truth about pulling over for a nap while business was slow?

Claims (47 extracted, 2 hedged)

New on the Beyond the Brief podcast: Automated license plate readers are a lot of things, but one thing they definitely are is great tool for stalking. asserted
they → automate → stalking
J. Walker, concurring: I have comments. asserted
I → concur → comments
- Rather than provide documents through discovery, the feds now direct people in DHS proceedings to file FOIA requests. asserted
feds → provide → requests
Their lawyers sue, claiming that this procedure is too slow and the responses often incomplete. asserted
responses → sue → ?
If the first thing we do is kill all the lawyers, the second is deny standing to those who remain. asserted
who → do → those
- Uber driver passes six field sobriety tests, and, after he's arrested anyway, his blood tests come back negative for intoxicants. asserted
tests → pass → intoxicants
So maybe he was telling the truth about pulling over for a nap while business was slow? asserted
business → tell → nap
Brookhaven, Penn. officer (weeks later): No, I'm filing charges for DUI. asserted
I → file → DUI
To a jury this must go. asserted
this → go → jury
- In 2020, a disgruntled lawyer murdered the son of a federal district judge. asserted
lawyer → murder → judge
Most states responded with laws that restrict addresses disclosure for certain public officials. asserted
that → respond → officials
But only West Virginia's law goes straight to liability (for, e.g., data brokers) without first requiring a takedown request. asserted
law → go → request
- Your summarist is not sure exactly how to implement this practice tip (New Orleans voodoo dolls?), but if you are going to ask the Fifth Circuit to extend qualified immunity to a statute where it has never gone before (here, the Fair Labor Standards Act), you really should avoid having Judge Willett write the opinion. asserted
Willett → implement → opinion
- Undocumented immigrants—who have lived here over a decade, don't have criminal records, and have close relatives who are citizens—ask: Can they be imprisoned for the duration of the deportation process or does the Constitution require an inquiry into whether they're a flight risk or danger to the community? asserted
they → live → community
- In which the Sixth Circuit holds that the federal prohibition on firearm possession by anyone "adjudicated as a mental defective" does not violate the Second Amendment on its face because it can sometimes be applied constitutionally—like to this defendant, who could have petitioned to have his rights restored under Missouri law but "[i]nstead, he drove to Fort Knox wearing body armor and possessing eight guns." uncertain
he → hold → guns
- Now-former Perry Twp., Ohio police chief attempts to intimidate auditor hired to look into his practices, culminating in his filing misdemeanor charges against her—and then pursuing them as if they were felony charges, i.e., having her arrested outside his jurisdiction and ensuring she spends 36 hours in jail instead of just receiving a summons. asserted
she → attempt → summons
To a jury this must go. asserted
this → go → jury
Lower courts, it's almost never Rooker-Feldman; stop dismissing cases. asserted
it → stop → cases
OK, sometimes it's Rooker-Feldman, but don't go nuts. asserted
it → go → ?
We are holding the line; the district court was wrong to invoke Rooker-Feldman where the plaintiffs are challenging administrative action that predated any court decision. asserted
that → hold → decision
We're glad you asked. asserted
you → ask → ?
] - The Durbin Amendment to the Dodd-Frank Act authorized the Federal Reserve to regulate debit-card interchange fees (the per-swipe fee that banks charge merchants when you use a debit card). asserted
you → authorize → card
But it instructed the Fed to limit those fees to only the "incremental cost incurred" in the transaction. asserted
it → instruct → transaction
Let's just call it 21 cents. asserted
's → let → it
You might have gotten away with that sort of thing in the Chevron era, but nowadays, "We say 'what the law is.'" uncertain
law → get → era
The 21-cent cap is vacated. asserted
cap → vacate → ?
- Each year, the State Dept. must hold a lottery and award up to 55,000 visas to people from countries with low rates of immigration to the United States. asserted
. → hold → States
This year, however, officials decided not to. asserted
officials → decide → ?
Lawyers who represent visa selectees sue. asserted
who → represent → selectees
If the first thing we do is kill all the lawyers, the second is deny standing to those who remain. asserted
who → do → those
- Fifteen days before the midterm elections, the Department of Justice sued California, seeking a temporary restraining order that would require the state to sequester ballots that DOJ alleges were sent to non-citizens. asserted
DOJ → sue → citizens
Ninth Circuit (Monday, per curiam, over a dissent): We're not going to order that. asserted
We → go → that
Ninth Circuit (Friday, per curiam, over a dissent): We're not going to order that. asserted
We → go → that
Berkeley, Calif. officials seek to shut down a homeless encampment on city property to stymie a leptospirosis outbreak. asserted
officials → seek → outbreak
The city, among other things, needs to first follow the ADA. asserted
city → need → ADA
That makes sense, here's a P.I. Ninth Circuit (per curiam, 73 pages): P.I. is stayed, but only a bit of it. asserted
stayed → make → it
Partial dissent: Rats are spreading this disease, and we're worried about the ADA? - California prohibits employers from requiring employees to attend meetings where religion or politics (including unionization) will be discussed. asserted
religion → spread → unionization
That's a content-based restriction on speech. asserted
That → base → speech
The law doesn't apply to meetings about how to fill out firm paperwork. asserted
law → apply → paperwork
It's content based. asserted
It → base → ?
…and 7 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support