Photo via The Sydney Morning Herald

As a reviewer, I believe star ratings are an insult to the public

Read the original at The Sydney Morning Herald ↗
Cite

Wilson, B. (2026, October 30). As a reviewer, I believe star ratings are an insult to the public. The Sydney Morning Herald. https://www.smh.com.au/culture/tv-and-radio/as-a-reviewer-i-believe-star-ratings-are-an-insult-to-the-public-20261031-p6182v.html?ref=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_source=rss_feed

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Sydney Morning Herald · collected 2026-10-30 · by Benji Wilson

Quick Summary

A reviewer argues that star ratings for movies, TV shows, and books are overly simplistic and fail to capture nuanced criticism in the arts. While acknowledging their utility for consumer goods, the author contends that in cultural contexts, star ratings reduce complex evaluations to a meaningless average centered around three stars, eliminating critical distinctions. The piece critiques how this system stifles meaningful critique and suggests it is insulting to both creators and consumers of art.
Written by AI on 2026-11-02, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Benji Wilson, a TV show reviewer, argues that star ratings are detrimental and misleading in his latest piece. He contends that these ratings, typically ranging from one to five stars, influence consumer decisions across various platforms like Amazon, IMDb, and Rotten Tomatoes. According to Wilson, star ratings have become ubiquitous, affecting everything from movie reviews to customer experiences at airports. His book "Rate This Book," which explores the impact of star ratings, currently holds a 4.4-star rating on Amazon. Wilson asserts that while these ratings grab attention, they often fail to provide nuanced critiques and can unfairly sway public opinion about products or media content.

Written for “Star Ratings Controversy” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 118171 · logged 2026-11-02

Story

📰 Star Ratings Controversy
Entertainment · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
39
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
5%
2 of 39 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
61/100
The Sydney Morning Herald's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Entertainment
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-02 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Sydney Morning Herald · 5842 article(s) · 15 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 15 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Benji Wilson
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The truth is that everything is not awesome, as The Lego Movie would have it, but then neither is everything awful.
🔮 A bullet in the head will do that to you.
Also by Benji Wilson
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Amazon Goodreads IMDb Metacritic Rotten Tomatoes

Subjects

Amazon ORG · 2× Goodreads ORG · 2× Netflix ORG · 2× Booking.com ORG · 1× IMDb ORG · 1× Johnny Punter PERSON · 1× Kim Kardashian’s PERSON · 1× Metacritic ORG · 1× Rotten Tomatoes ORG · 1× Spotify ORG · 1×

Narrative

I’ve written a whole book myself about star ratings and consumer reviews (called Rate This Book and currently rated 4.4 stars on Amazon) and my conclusion is that star ratings – everyone reading them and giving them for everything from the new series of Slow Horses to your experience in an airport toilet – have taken over the world.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-02
🔮 The truth is that everything is not awesome, as The Lego Movie would have it, but then neither is everything awful.
2026-11-02 · The Sydney Morning Herald
As a reviewer, I believe star ratings are an insult to the public · assertive framing

Claims (39 extracted, 2 hedged)

Walk past a movie poster, scour the ads for your next dose of must-see TV or hit up Goodreads for a new book, and you’ll find yourself playing the same game: you’re presented with a star rating, usually from one to five, and encouraged to base your next move upon it. asserted
you → walk → it
I review TV shows for a living, and part of the job is to assign each and every one a star rating. asserted
part → review → rating
I get it – the star rating is the first thing a reader looks at, and if it leads them to read any of the words below, then great. asserted
it → get → words
Stars twinkle; they get attention. asserted
they → twinkle → attention
The star rating gets to go on the front page. asserted
rating → get → page
It gets funnelled into Metacritic and IMDb and so on, in to a great, universal rating that, thanks to Rotten Tomatoes and the like, these days can determine the fate of a show or a book. asserted
that → funnel → show
I’ve written a whole book myself about star ratings and consumer reviews (called Rate This Book and currently rated 4.4 stars on Amazon) and my conclusion is that star ratings – everyone reading them and giving them for everything from the new series of Slow Horses to your experience in an airport toilet – have taken over the world. asserted
ratings → write → world
But if star ratings are great for determining which is the best pair of scissors or whether a Booking.com hotel room is worthy of your consideration, in the popular arts, star ratings are a bust. asserted
ratings → determine → arts
– witness the excitement when Kim Kardashian’s world-historically awful Netflix legal drama All’s Fair ignited a firestorm of critical horror, with a slew of zero-star ratings across the world — and a dewy-eyed panegyric to a five-star production like Pachinko or The Wire is a gimme, too. The problem is in the middle. asserted
problem → witness → middle
Three stars, the great, gawping ‘meh’ of modern culture, is a meaningless average that gobbles up all comers. asserted
that → gawp → comers
When I decide that last week’s episode of The Great British Bake Off, for example, is three rather than four stars, I’m consigning it to a bracket from which nuance instantly evaporates. asserted
nuance → decide → which
The temptation is always to regress towards the mean, which is three stars – neither a damnation nor a garland; just a large, padded fence to sit on. asserted
which → regress → mean
The truth is that everything is not awesome, as The Lego Movie would have it, but then neither is everything awful. asserted
everything → have → it
Both the laws of statistics and your general life experience will tell you that most television, most stuff, even most people, are to be found somewhere in the region of “OK”. asserted
television → tell → OK
But that means that saying something is three stars is not really saying anything at all. asserted
is → mean → anything
So you go up to four, or down to two, and then suddenly you’re edging dangerously towards competence, even perfection, or slumping towards censure. asserted
you → go → censure
With just five ratings to choose from, star ratings flatten criticism. asserted
ratings → choose → criticism
Goodreads recently admitted as much, with the announcement that it was introducing not just half stars but quarter stars as well. asserted
it → admit → stars
“More ways to say exactly what you mean,” the popular book-reviewing site announced earlier this month, adding that this was the No.1 request from their 150 million users. asserted
this → say → users
You can see where this is heading. asserted
this → see → ?
The whole point of a five-star system is to keep things simple. asserted
point → keep → things
Johnny Punter can glance at the poster, see a panoply of stars and go book his ticket. asserted
Punter → glance → ticket
Breaking the stars down into granules of opinion grants a licence for nuance, but the star rating itself is anti-nuance and pro-clarity. asserted
rating → break → nuance
Either it’s simple or it’s not. Where does all of this starring come from, anyway? asserted
all → ’ → starring
The great democratisation of criticism – brought about by the internet, blogs and then social media – means that these days, everyone is a critic. asserted
everyone → bring → internet
That same great democratisation of criticism came along with an explosion of entertainment choices. asserted
democratisation → come → choices
People needed prompt guidance through Spotify, Netflix and Amazon’s infinite shelf, and star ratings, which were ported from travel guides in the first instance and then spread through the internet via consumer reviews on e-commerce platforms, offered a universally recognised quick steer. asserted
which → need → steer
But the currency has become corrupted. asserted
currency → become → ?
The predominance of ratings aggregators such as Rotten Tomatoes or IMDb means that instead of being a source of wisdom-of-crowds guidance, star ratings have become a meaningless mush. asserted
ratings → mean → guidance
Liane Moriarty is some way better than King Lear, according to Goodreads. uncertain
Moriarty → accord → Goodreads
IMDb claims SpongeBob SquarePants is virtually equal to the original UK iteration of The Office. uncertain
SquarePants → claim → Office
Any movie marketing department can find a five-star rating for their poster if they spend enough time looking for it. asserted
they → find → it
It turns out that the wisdom of crowds has led to opinion becoming just more food for the algorithm. asserted
opinion → turn → algorithm
Rating is overrated. asserted
Rating → overrate → ?
This ‘novelty act’ belongs in the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame asserted
act → belong → Fame
In praise of the queue: Why we stan standing in line - asserted
we → stan → line
Radiohead: Anyone else think this beloved band kinda sucks? asserted
band → think → ?
This Bravo reality show achieves the impossible asserted
show → achieve → impossible
Jeopardy!: In a time of global peril, a TV quiz show hosted by a Mormon brainiac can save us - Nice guys finish first: Why this film is criminally underrated - Binge-watching: Short seasons are ruining TV; bring back the 22-episode season asserted
seasons → host → season
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support