A New York appeals court has stopped residential tenants from adding more than $321,000 in claimed damage to their personal belongings to a long-running lawsuit over damp and mould.
asserted
court → stop → damp
The court pointed to years of unexplained delays, missing receipts and serious unfairness to their former landlord.
asserted
court → point → landlord
In a decision issued on 28 October 2026, the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department, unanimously overturned an earlier ruling that had allowed the tenants to add the large financial claim.
uncertain
tenants → issue → claim
The ruling in Dostana Ljusic v Kathleen M. Rodgers Petit rejected an attempt by tenants Dostana Ljusic and her co-plaintiffs to add a claim of $321,728.79 for household items they said were ruined.
uncertain
they → reject → items
The original lawsuit was filed in August 2018.
asserted
lawsuit → file → August
The legal case began eight years ago when the tenants sued their former landlord, Kathleen M. Rodgers Petit.
asserted
tenants → begin → landlord
They claimed that mould exposure at a rental property in Orange County, New York, had caused health problems and made the home unsuitable to live in.
asserted
home → claim → problems
According to court records published by the New York State Law Reporting Bureau, the tenants submitted a formal bill of particulars in May 2020.
uncertain
tenants → accord → May
It listed physical injuries they said were caused by mould.
asserted
they → list → mould
However, it did not mention any damaged personal belongings or provide estimates of their value.
asserted
it → mention → value
The issue of damaged possessions first came up in April 2022.
asserted
issue → damage → April
During a legal deposition, Ljusic testified that several household items had been thrown away because of mould contamination.
asserted
items → testify → contamination
After this testimony, the landlord's lawyers formally asked the tenants to provide a detailed list of the discarded items.
asserted
lawyers → ask → items
They also requested shop receipts or other proof of purchase for replacement goods.
asserted
They → request → goods
Instead of providing receipts or invoices, the tenants submitted a one-page summary in October 2022 claiming $70,500 in property damage.
asserted
tenants → provide → damage
Eight months later, in June 2023, they submitted another one-page summary.
asserted
they → submit → summary
This time, the claimed amount had increased sharply to $321,728.79.
asserted
amount → claim → 321,728.79
Official records from the Appellate Division show that neither summary included supporting documents, receipts or records showing how the items had been valued.
asserted
items → show → documents
Procedural battles and trial court reversal
After the plaintiffs filed a note of issue in October 2023, formally confirming that the pre-trial evidence-gathering process was complete
asserted
process → file → October
, they tried to add the property damage claim through an additional filing.
uncertain
they → try → filing
The landlord quickly asked the court to remove the late claim.
uncertain
landlord → ask → claim
In April 2024, the Supreme Court of Orange County agreed and granted the landlord's request to strike the property damage claim.
uncertain
Court → agree → claim
The tenants then filed a formal motion in April 2024 under Section 3025(b) of New York's Civil Practice Law and Rules.
asserted
tenants → file → Law
They asked the court for permission to change their original complaint and include the property damage claim.
uncertain
They → ask → claim
The landlord's lawyers opposed the request.
asserted
lawyers → oppose → request
They argued that adding hundreds of thousands of dollars in property damage years after the evidence-gathering process had ended would put the landlord at an unfair disadvantage.
asserted
process → argue → disadvantage
They also argued that the claim was blocked by the legal rule known as laches, which prevents people from making legal claims after unreasonable delays.
uncertain
which → argue → delays
Despite these objections, Supreme Court Justice David J. Squirrell allowed the tenants to change their complaint in an order dated 25 September 2024.
asserted
tenants → allow → order
The landlord then immediately appealed the decision to the Second Department.
asserted
landlord → appeal → Department
Appellate court finds severe prejudice
asserted
court → find → prejudice
In a decision written for the four-judge appeals panel, Justices Valerie Brathwaite Nelson, Paul Wooten, Laurence L. Love and James P. McCormack ruled that the lower court had made a legal error by allowing the late change.
asserted
court → write → change
Under New York's civil procedure rules, courts generally allow parties to change their legal complaints freely.
asserted
parties → allow → complaints
However, permission can be denied when the changes cause unfair surprise or harm to the other side.
asserted
changes → deny → side
The judges stressed that long delays combined with serious harm to the defence can prevent such changes.
asserted
delays → stress → changes
"Here, the defendant demonstrated significant prejudice as the plaintiffs' proposed amended complaint was a significant expansion of their claims, was sought after the parties had completed discovery, and was asserted without supporting documentation," the panel wrote in its unanimous decision.
uncertain
panel → demonstrate → decision
The judges also pointed out that the tenants had not given a convincing reason for waiting more than five years after filing their original lawsuit to add the claim.
uncertain
tenants → point → claim
They noted that the tenants had known about the condition of their belongings well before they brought the case.
asserted
they → note → case
"Moreover, the plaintiffs failed to offer a reasonable excuse for their delay of more than five years in seeking leave to amend the complaint, despite knowing the facts regarding their claim of injury to property for three years prior to the commencement of this action," the decision stated.
uncertain
decision → fail → action
Strict limits on late lawsuit changes
The appeals court's decision supports long-standing New York legal rules that prevent people from adding large financial claims without proof late in a lawsuit, especially after the formal evidence-gathering stage has ended.
uncertain
stage → support → lawsuit
By rejecting the tenants' request and awarding legal costs to the landlord, the Second Department removed the entire $321,728.79 property damage claim from the ongoing case.
uncertain
Department → reject → case
…and 2 more, not listed.
The Aporia
