A Republican member on the House Armed Services Committee told Fox News Digital ahead of the midterm elections that the Trump administration has a key decision to make on the future of the U.S.-Iran war as "continuing to do just enough not to lose, but not enough to win, is not OK."
asserted
continuing → tell → enough
Rep. Pat Harrigan, R-N.C., made the comments as Vice President JD Vance declared during a Fox News town hall on Thursday that he promises "Donald Trump is not going to let Iran become a forever war."
asserted
Iran → make → Thursday
Official and military sources also told Fox News this week that movements are being made in the Middle East to give the president options if he decides to resume strikes against Iran.
asserted
he → tell → Iran
"I share my constituents and many Americans' perspective that I'm very, very frustrated that this war is not over.
asserted
war → share → perspective
The way that ultimately this administration went about conducting the war, it needed to execute it and wrap it up in a very short period of time, and we are not there yet," said Harrigan, who is running for re-election in North Carolina's 10th Congressional District.
asserted
who → go → District
"That being said, Iran can't have a nuclear weapon.
asserted
Iran → say → weapon
And so at the end of the day, I do believe that this was a war that was inevitable at some point, but the party that's in power and the administration that decided to pull the trigger on it is responsible for the outcome, and they're responsible for the outcome in a very short period of time.
asserted
they → believe → time
Otherwise, things get really, really difficult," Harrigan continued.
asserted
Harrigan → get → ?
"And I think we've been seeing that, both from a political perspective but also from a policy perspective."
asserted
we → think → perspective
"And so while the administration needs to wrap this up, we are not in a forever war, but we need to make sure that we're not...
asserted
we → need → war
we keep the mission the same.
asserted
we → keep → mission
We accomplish the mission.
asserted
We → accomplish → mission
And we do what it takes to either win or come home," Harrigan added.
asserted
Harrigan → do → what
"And that binary decision has to get made by this administration."
asserted
decision → have → administration
Harrigan told Fox News Digital that Trump "needs to involve Congress" if he chooses to renew military action against the Iranian regime.
asserted
he → tell → regime
"I think that that will long-term set the course for the country to be resolute in affirming and actually executing and accomplishing the objectives that exist.
asserted
that → think → objectives
Because look, like it or not, Congress is responsible for the funding arm of the government.
asserted
Congress → look → government
And if they run out of money to accomplish the objectives, then that is not good for our strategic interests," he said.
asserted
he → run → interests
"So, in my opinion, Congress and the White House need to be very closely involved in making the next set of decisions that exist for this conflict."
asserted
that → need → conflict
"And we do need to make sure, again, that we either do what it takes to actually win in Iran, or we need to take the three out of five objectives that we've accomplished and say that, you know what?
asserted
you → need → what
We've largely accomplished our strategic objectives.
asserted
We → accomplish → objectives
We've got more work to do over the long-term that's going to require consistent and persistent over the horizon monitoring of their nuclear program.
asserted
that → get → program
And we're going to have to mow the lawn every now and again, and everybody's got to realize that, and leave, right?"
asserted
everybody → go → that
Harrigan continued, mentioning how the U.S. has prevented Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon and eliminated Tehran's missile and drone production.
asserted
U.S. → continue → production
"But we've got to choose one of those two options because continuing to do just enough not to lose, but not enough to win, is not OK," he said.
asserted
he → get → enough
And it does not serve the long-term strategic interests of the United States.
asserted
it → serve → States
So it's time to choose."
asserted
it → choose → ?
Harrigan, a Green Beret and business entrepreneur, is running for re-election on Tuesday in North Carolina.
asserted
Harrigan → run → Carolina
He is facing off against Democrat challenger Ashley Bell, a physician associate, and Libertarian candidate Steve Feldman, who ran unsuccessfully for the seat two years ago.
asserted
who → face → seat
As a current member of Congress, Harrigan told Fox News there is "no question" the Republican Party's House majority is at stake heading into Election Day.
asserted
majority → tell → Day
"Whoever has 218 votes gets to chart the course of the direction of the House, the work that its committees do.
asserted
committees → get → that
And in particular, as it relates to the Trump administration, whether or not President Trump's going to get impeached," he added.
asserted
he → relate → administration
"What this boils down to is the future direction of the country.
asserted
boils → boil → country
Are we going to be stuck looking backwards instead of actually looking forwards, dealing with the actual business of the county and the free world, or are we going to be stuck in some sort of a Democratically-led nightmare that is simply going to be obstructionist to the conservative principles and values that people voted for in 2024?
asserted
people → go → 2024
" Harrigan asked.
asserted
Harrigan → ask → ?
The Aporia
