Photo via New York Post

Who’s buying, who’s selling and who’s trying to figure things out at NFL trade deadline

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Dunleavy, R. (2026, October 30). Who’s buying, who’s selling and who’s trying to figure things out at NFL trade deadline. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/10/30/sports/nfl-2026-trade-deadline-guide-buyers-selllers-players-to-watch/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-10-30 · by Ryan Dunleavy

Quick Summary

The NFL trade deadline, originally set for November 10, saw early activity from the Indianapolis Colts who traded star players Quenton Nelson and DeForest Buckner before the official date. This move was followed by the Chicago Bears convincing the Tennessee Titans to sell early, with the Bears acquiring defensive tackle Jeffery Simmons in a deal that involved two first-round picks. The article explores which teams might follow these trends as sellers or buyers and considers potential middle-ground strategies for other franchises.
Written by AI on 2026-10-31, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The Indianapolis Colts made sweeping changes on October 27, 2026, by trading two of their star players: sending eight-time Pro Bowl guard Quenton Nelson to the Seattle Seahawks and Pro Bowl defensive tackle DeForest Buckner to the San Francisco 49ers. These trades were aimed at acquiring draft picks. Jonathan Taylor’s wife, Ayanna Taylor, expressed concern on TikTok about her husband's future with the team amidst these changes. The Colts' moves have raised questions among fans and players alike about whether other key figures like Taylor will be traded next before the November 10 trade deadline. With the Colts already trading their first-round pick to the New York Jets, speculation is growing about which teams might follow in pursuing a rebuild strategy by becoming early sellers.

Written for “NFL Trade Deadline Frenzy” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 2 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 117900 · logged 2026-10-31

Story

📰 NFL Trade Deadline Frenzy
Sports · 3 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 20% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post
Hedges 4 of 15 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A focuses on Jonathan Taylor's stance regarding trade rumors, while Article B discusses general roster changes and trades made by the Colts around the NFL trade deadline.”
Fox News
Hedges 4 of 28 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A focuses on Jonathan Taylor addressing trade rumors, while Article B discusses the Colts' actions in trading players Quenton Nelson and DeForest Buckner.”
Toronto Star
Hedges 0 of 31 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A discusses Jonathan Taylor's performance in a game while trade deadline noise is mentioned, whereas Article B covers actual trades made by the Colts and other teams approaching the NFL trade deadline.”
Toronto Star
Hedges 4 of 48 claims Outlet record 64/100
“While both articles discuss the Colts trading Quenton Nelson and DeForest Buckner, ARTICLE A focuses on the aftermath in the locker room while ARTICLE B discusses broader implications of early selling and tanking strategies.”
New York Post
Hedges 2 of 12 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different trade actions involving the Colts but do not describe the same specific incident or timing.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
5
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
20%
1 of 5 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
3
Sports
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-31 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 15511 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Ryan Dunleavy
69 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Tanking would make sense — if the Colts hadn’t previously traded their first-round pick to the Jets.
🔮 If John Harbaugh were picking between two Michigan-bred quarterbacks this week, the Giants would start J.J. McCarthy over Tom Brady.
🔮 Edmunds will go from logging every defensive snap in the first six games to missing every snap in the final 11, The Post confirmed, after he was injured late in last week’s game against the Saints.
🔮 Maybe it’s time for the NFL to change its logo to include a player’s hand punching at the football that sits atop the shield.
🔮 “Maybe now 20 percent of that 30 that was gone is back,” Nagy said before Thursday’s practice.
🔮 McCarthy’s last pass — on fourth-and-1 from the 14-yard line with 12 seconds remaining — fell incomplete or else the Giants would’ve had a chance to win the game or send it to overtime despite trailing 34-10 when the quarterback change was made with 11:36 to go.
🔮 tRY IT NOW“I would love for us to be in that kind of a circumstance,” Harbaugh said.
🔮 If J.J. McCarthy was guaranteed to throw for 943 yards, rush for 104 yards and lead 12 scoring drives in his next start, then the Giants wouldn’t have a quarterback controversy on their hands.
🔮 “I’m feeling good,” Mauigoa said, indicating he will be on the field again soon.
🔮 Skattebo knew ahead of Sunday’s game that he was not going to start and that his playing time would be diminished as a result of four fumbles in the first five games, but he wasn’t expecting to be limited to six offensive snaps (all in the first half) and no touches in the 34-27 loss to the Saints.
Also by Ryan Dunleavy
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 69 articles by Ryan Dunleavy →

Topics

49ers Bears Colts NFL Seahawks

Subjects

Colts ORG · 4× Bears ORG · 2× 49ers ORG · 1× DeForest Buckner PERSON · 1× Ed Dodds PERSON · 1× Jets ORG · 1× NFL ORG · 1× Quenton Nelson PERSON · 1× Seahawks ORG · 1× Titans ORG · 1×

Narrative

Then the Bears convinced the Titans to be early sellers, seizing a chance to get an extra game out of All-Pro defensive tackle Jeffery Simmons even if it meant trading two first-round picks to do so. What other teams are going to join the Colts and Bears in the sellers’ market?
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-31
🔮 Tanking would make sense — if the Colts hadn’t previously traded their first-round pick to the Jets.

Claims (5 extracted, 1 hedged)

The NFL moved its trade deadline back one week in 2024, but the Colts just moved up the action by two weeks. asserted
Colts → move → weeks
Instead of waiting until the days before the Nov. 10 deadline and hoping to squeeze out bigger returns from a desperate suitor, Colts interim general manager Ed Dodds imploded the roster by trading guard Quenton Nelson (Seahawks) and defensive tackle DeForest Buckner (49ers). asserted
Dodds → wait → Nelson
Tanking would make sense — if the Colts hadn’t previously traded their first-round pick to the Jets. asserted
Colts → make → Jets
Then the Bears convinced the Titans to be early sellers, seizing a chance to get an extra game out of All-Pro defensive tackle Jeffery Simmons even if it meant trading two first-round picks to do so. What other teams are going to join the Colts and Bears in the sellers’ market? asserted
teams → convince → market
What teams could play both sides? uncertain
teams → play → sides
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support