Photo via Semafor

My reporting prompted Dartmouth provost to resign. It wasn't the right call

Read the original at Semafor ↗
Cite

Albergotti, R. (2026, October 30). My reporting prompted Dartmouth provost to resign. It wasn't the right call. Semafor. https://www.semafor.com/article/10/30/2026/dartmouth-made-a-bad-call-on-provosts-ai-use

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Semafor · collected 2026-10-30 · by Reed Albergotti

Quick Summary

Reed argues in an opinion piece that his reporting led to Dartmouth Provost Santiago Schnell's resignation due to the use of AI in guest columns. However, Reed contends that Schnell’s actions did not warrant such severe consequences as they aligned with how many other authors were using AI tools to aid their writing without passing off AI-generated content as original work. The article suggests that a better approach would be to address transparency issues and adapt to the growing prevalence of AI in academic and journalistic contexts rather than enforcing strict bans or punitive measures.
Written by AI on 2026-10-31, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In August 2026, journalist Reed Albergotti reported on the widespread use of AI in guest columns published by major news outlets, including one written by Dartmouth Provost Santiago Schnell. This reporting led to Schnell's resignation this week, despite Albergotti’s belief that such a drastic action was not warranted. The investigation revealed that 50 guest columns containing AI-generated text were published across the New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post over one month. Albergotti argues that Schnell's mistake, if any, was failing to disclose his use of AI rather than outright violating prohibitions against it. He questions whether blanket bans on AI in writing are practical given its prevalence and capability to mimic human thought processes accurately.

Written for “Dartmouth Provost Resigns” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans left (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans left for article 117895 (high confidence, 2 verified quotes) · logged 2026-10-31

Story

📰 Dartmouth Provost Resigns
Education · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
14
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
7%
1 of 14 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
60/100
Semafor's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Education
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-31 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Semafor · 1393 article(s) · 1 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 1 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Reed Albergotti
17 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 My hope was that the reporting would lead to some smart questions, not a shame-and-blame witch hunt that would result in a resignation: Does it make sense to have a blanket ban on something that has become so prevalent and can fool some of the world’s most renowned editors?
🔮 With a team of just 10 people and $10 million in funding, Aseon is doing something that, not long ago, would have taken years and a massive team to attempt: They are building parking space-sized pods equipped with robot arms that can clean and charge autonomous vehicles.
2026-10-28 · assertive framing · What startups look like in the AI era
🔮 Plus, why nobody would work for Mark Zuckerberg if he resembled Aaron Sorkin’s celluloid version in the upcoming film The Social Reckoning.
🔮 Offering always-on, agentic assistant tools will cost OpenAI and Meta — which recently launched its cutesy agent Muse — a ton of money, and it’s not clear yet that these agents will work well.
2026-09-30 · assertive framing · OpenAI's new pricing tiers highlight compute bottleneck
🔮 Some inside OpenAI and Anthropic were “blindsided” by an apparent agreement over the weekend that both companies would slow down the pace of AI research, the FT reported.
2026-09-18 · assertive framing · The real reason not to IPO
🔮 One potential reason floated to Semafor by market participants is that compute futures could be manipulated to show a sharp drop in the cost of older chips, which might destabilize AI stocks and debt markets.
🔮 The movie seems like an attempt to paint Altman and AI as villains, with lines like “Countries will fall.
2026-09-15 · assertive framing · Trailer for Altman biopic misses the real drama
🔮 Meta’s new AI assistant Muse could be the first experience a lot of people have with the power of AI that can actually do things for you, rather than just answer questions.
2026-09-15 · mixed framing · Meta launches Muse AI assistant
🔮 He could not immediately be reached for comment.
2026-09-15 · mixed framing · AI researcher Andrew Tulloch is leaving Meta
🔮 A calm read of Amodei’s proposal may lower your blood pressure.
2026-09-13 · assertive framing · How the AI apocalypse story escaped containment
Also by Reed Albergotti
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 17 articles by Reed Albergotti →

Topics

Dartmouth The New York Times The Wall Street Journal the Washington Post

Subjects

Schnell PERSON · 5× Dartmouth ORG · 3× Reed PERSON · 1× Santiago Schnell PERSON · 1× The New York Times ORG · 1× The Wall Street Journal ORG · 1× the Washington Post ORG · 1×

Narrative

My hope was that the reporting would lead to some smart questions, not a shame-and-blame witch hunt that would result in a resignation: Does it make sense to have a blanket ban on something that has become so prevalent and can fool some of the world’s most renowned editors?
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-31
🔮 My hope was that the reporting would lead to some smart questions, not a shame-and-blame witch hunt that would result in a resignation: Does it make sense to have a blanket ban on something that has become so prevalent and can fool some of the world’s most renowned editors?

Claims (14 extracted, 1 hedged)

In August, I wrote about the use of AI in guest columns published in major news outlets, including by Dartmouth Provost Santiago Schnell. asserted
I → write → Schnell
This week, he resigned. asserted
he → resign → ?
The thing is, he shouldn’t have lost his job. asserted
he → lose → job
Schnell’s was one of 50 guest columns that included AI-generated text that were published in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post over a one-month period. asserted
that → include → period
An (AI-assisted) analysis showed that AI use in writing has become incredibly common, even in publications that prohibit it. asserted
that → assist → it
My hope was that the reporting would lead to some smart questions, not a shame-and-blame witch hunt that would result in a resignation: Does it make sense to have a blanket ban on something that has become so prevalent and can fool some of the world’s most renowned editors? asserted
that → lead → editors
If the Dartmouth provost did anything wrong, it was failing to disclose that he used AI in the process of writing columns and academic journal articles for publications that prohibit its use. asserted
that → do → use
But it appears all of Schnell’s writing was based on his own ideas and work. asserted
all → appear → ideas
He didn’t just prompt a chatbot and pass the output off as his own. asserted
He → prompt → own
“I develop ideas and arguments, conduct the research, evaluate the evidence and sources, determine the structure, prepare drafts and decide what appears in the final text,” Schnell told The Dartmouth newspaper, which did its own investigation into more of Schnell’s work. asserted
which → develop → work
I get why students are mad, and why Schnell’s resignation might seem appropriate. uncertain
resignation → get → ?
Students are often prohibited from using AI in class and subject to punishment if they’re caught. asserted
they → prohibit → punishment
But forced resignations just perpetuate the current situation, where we are fighting against a current of technology use that’s become so commonplace it’s impossible to fight. asserted
it → force → use
Years from now, we’ll look back on this time with regret and wonder why we were so outraged by people using a new tool that was so obviously useful. asserted
that → look → tool
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support