Photo via Fox News

The silent majority problem and why campaign pollsters keep 'fighting the last war' on elections

Read the original at Fox News ↗
Cite

Troy, T. (2026, October 30). The silent majority problem and why campaign pollsters keep 'fighting the last war' on elections. Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/silent-majority-problem-why-campaign-pollsters-keep-fighting-last-war-elections

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Fox News · collected 2026-10-30 · by Tevi Troy

Quick Summary

The article discusses historical inaccuracies in political polling, starting with Literary Digest's incorrect prediction of Franklin D. Roosevelt’s loss to Alf Landon in 1936 due to flawed sampling methods. It then covers the role of celebrity pollsters like Pat Caddell and Dick Morris who influenced presidential strategies but were not always accurate, such as when Caddell advised Jimmy Carter on his "malaise speech." The piece highlights how modern presidents have struggled with consistent low approval ratings despite some temporary boosts during crises.
Written by AI on 2026-11-02, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Ninety years ago, on October 31, 1936, Literary Digest predicted that Alf Landon would defeat Franklin Delano Roosevelt in the presidential election. Despite surveying nearly 2.4 million people, this prediction was inaccurate because the sample overrepresented Republican voters and underrepresented Democrats due to its sampling method using telephone books and car registration lists. As a result, Roosevelt won by a large margin, leading to Literary Digest folding shortly afterward.

Two years later, in 1938, Gallup began tracking presidential approval ratings. However, even with improved methodologies, polls still faced significant challenges. For instance, the Chicago Daily Tribune famously misstated "Dewey Defeats Truman" on election day in 1948 due to reliance on outdated polling data.

These historical instances highlight persistent issues in accurately predicting election outcomes despite advancements in polling techniques.

Written for “Silent Majority Problem In Elections” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 117724 · logged 2026-11-02

Story

📰 Silent Majority Problem In Elections
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
44
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
2%
1 of 44 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
69/100
Fox News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-02 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Fox News · 6262 article(s) · 11 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 11 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Tevi Troy
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Ninety years ago, on Oct. 31, 1936, Literary Digest, which had correctly forecast presidential election winners since 1916, predicted that Alf Landon would beat Franklin Delano Roosevelt in the upcoming election.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Arkansas Digest Gallup Literary Digest the Chicago Daily Tribune’s

Subjects

Clinton PERSON · 9× Morris PERSON · 6× Bill Clinton PERSON · 2× Carter PERSON · 2× Gallup ORG · 2× George W. Bush PERSON · 2× Literary Digest ORG · 2× Alf Landon PERSON · 1× Franklin Delano Roosevelt PERSON · 1× Roosevelt PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Ninety years ago, on Oct. 31, 1936, Literary Digest, which had correctly forecast presidential election winners since 1916, predicted that Alf Landon would beat Franklin Delano Roosevelt in the upcoming election.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-02
🔮 Ninety years ago, on Oct. 31, 1936, Literary Digest, which had correctly forecast presidential election winners since 1916, predicted that Alf Landon would beat Franklin Delano Roosevelt in the upcoming election.

Claims (44 extracted, 1 hedged)

Ninety years ago, on Oct. 31, 1936, Literary Digest, which had correctly forecast presidential election winners since 1916, predicted that Alf Landon would beat Franklin Delano Roosevelt in the upcoming election. asserted
Landon → forecast → election
Roosevelt won handily. asserted
Roosevelt → win → ?
The Digest’s poll surveyed 10 million people via postcard, using telephone books and car registration lists for the information. asserted
poll → survey → information
Even though almost 2.4 million people responded — an impressive response rate — the misleading sample provided inaccurate results. asserted
sample → respond → results
Literary Digest folded shortly afterward. asserted
Digest → fold → ?
Two years later, in 1938, Gallup started tracking presidential approval ratings. asserted
Gallup → start → ratings
Even so, polls remained far from perfect. asserted
polls → remain → ?
In 1948, the Chicago Daily Tribune’s embarrassing front-page declaration "Dewey Defeats Truman" stemmed in part from a misuse of polling. asserted
Dewey → defeat → polling
The paper relied on earlier polls that did not reflect the Election Day reality in making its prediction. asserted
that → rely → prediction
As the science of polling improved over time, campaign pros began to rely on pollsters. asserted
pros → improve → pollsters
John F. Kennedy was the first president to be strongly associated with a polling firm, as he used Lou Harris and the Harris organization's polls in his 1960 campaign for president. asserted
he → associate → president
In the 1970s, we witnessed the rise of the celebrity pollsters: Pat Caddell for Jimmy Carter, Richard Wirthlin for Ronald Reagan, and Stan Greeberg and Dick Morris for Bill Clinton. asserted
we → witness → Clinton
He misjudged the public mood, and Carter’s "malaise speech" became one of the most disastrous presidential speeches of all time. asserted
speech → misjudge → time
Morris, for his part, had a tempestuous relationship with Bill Clinton. asserted
Morris → have → Clinton
They once reportedly came to blows while Morris was advising Clinton during his time as governor of Arkansas. uncertain
Morris → come → Arkansas
Morris was initially on the outs and Greenberg in charge of polls when Clinton won the 1992 election. asserted
Clinton → win → election
But Morris secretly came back and started advising Clinton after the Democrats lost control of Congress in the 1994 "Republican Revolution." asserted
Democrats → come → Revolution
Morris even had a code name — "Charlie" — to keep his identity secret from the more liberal White House staff, which resented Morris’ pushing of Clinton to the center. asserted
which → have → center
Morris would poll everything, even where Clinton should go on vacation. asserted
Clinton → poll → vacation
When Clinton left office after two terms in 2000, he had survived the Monica Lewinsky scandal — despite polls showing that Americans strongly disapproved of Clinton's behavior. asserted
Americans → leave → behavior
He left office at 66%, one of the highest outgoing figures in history. asserted
He → leave → history
21st-century presidents would be thrilled to get approval ratings anywhere near Clinton's final number. asserted
presidents → get → number
George W. Bush hit 86% after the 9/11 terror attacks, but that did not last. asserted
that → hit → attacks
For the most part, the "low and steady" phenomenon has meant that presidents in this century have struggled to get about 50% approval. asserted
presidents → mean → approval
Still, the polling mishaps have continued. asserted
mishaps → continue → ?
In 2004, exit polls predicted a win for John Kerry over George W. Bush. asserted
polls → predict → Bush
Campaign adviser Bob Shrum even said to Kerry on Election Day, "Can I be the first to call you, Mr. President?" asserted
I → say → you
The exit polls were wrong, and Bush won a second term. asserted
Bush → win → term
In 2012, Mitt Romney’s campaign wrongly thought it was headed for victory when its pollster made overly optimistic weighting assumptions. asserted
pollster → think → assumptions
The turnout model incorrectly assumed that Barack Obama would not generate the same level of youth and minority turnout that he had in 2008. asserted
he → assume → 2008
Polling took another big hit in 2016, when pollsters confidently predicted that Hillary Clinton would defeat Donald Trump. asserted
Clinton → take → Trump
She didn't, and the pollsters’ justification that they had the popular vote right but got the election result wrong did not help matters. asserted
result → do → matters
In our current midterm elections, we have seen a new wrinkle. asserted
we → see → wrinkle
Partisan polls overstated progressive support in the primaries, skewing the results and causing some candidates to drop out in the face of the inaccurate data. asserted
candidates → overstate → data
This latest mishap reinforces the lesson that polling often fails, although rarely in the same way twice. asserted
polling → reinforce → way
While technology and the science of polling are much better today than in 1936, the improvements complicate matters further. asserted
improvements → complicate → matters
While nearly everyone has a phone, they also have caller ID and don't answer calls from unfamiliar numbers. asserted
they → have → numbers
Response rates shrink, increasing the size of the "silent majority." asserted
rates → shrink → majority
In this new environment, human modeling decisions ironically become more, not less, important. asserted
decisions → become → environment
Polling errors come not from new techniques or technologies but from imperfect human decisions about how to deploy the new technologies. asserted
errors → come → technologies
…and 4 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support