Graffiti 'wrongly' labelled antisemitic in Sydney spree, judge finds

Read the original at ABC News (AU) ↗
Cite

McKinnell, J. (2026, August 19). Graffiti 'wrongly' labelled antisemitic in Sydney spree, judge finds. ABC News (AU). https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-08-19/graffiti-wrongly-labelled-antisemitic-in-sydney-judge-says/107055692

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

ABC News (AU) · collected 2026-08-19 · by Jamie McKinnell

Quick Summary

A judge has ruled that a man who vandalized vehicles with anti-Israel slogans in Sydney was not motivated by antisemitism, but rather by financial gain. The NSW Supreme Court dismissed an application to place 22-year-old Mohommed Farhat under extended supervision due to his risk of committing another serious offense. According to Justice Desmond Fagan's findings, Farhat was "incited and directed" by another person to commit the crimes for a $4,000 payment and drugs. The judge also criticized the definition of antisemitism used in expert opinion as not applicable to Farhat's case.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-08-19, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Mohommed Farhat, a 22-year-old man, admitted to vandalizing cars in Sydney's east in November 2024, spray-painting slogans like "F* Israel" and "PKK coming". The NSW Supreme Court dismissed an application by the state to place him under extended supervision for a year after his jail sentence, finding that he was not an "antisemitic bigot", but rather a "vandal for hire". The court ruled that Australians have freedom to express their views on Israel's treatment of Palestinians, even if others disagree and choose not to engage. If the application had succeeded, Farhat would have faced 55 strict conditions, which the court deemed "highly restrictive" of his liberty.

Written for “Sydney Graffiti Lawsuit” on 2026-10-17, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Sydney Graffiti Lawsuit
Crime & Law · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 10% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
ABC News (AU)
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 11% hedged 5 of 44 📰 publisher trust 71
“Article B mentions an inquiry and a media network receiving a social cohesion grant, whereas Article A reports on a court case involving vandalism offences”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
30
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
10%
3 of 30 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
71/100
ABC News (AU)'s corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-08-19 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

ABC News (AU) · 3200 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jamie McKinnell
17 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Jurors are expected to remain at the scene today before returning to hear evidence in the courtroom next week.
🔮 The jury heard she was instructed to turn on the phone so it could "ping", turn it off, then throw it into the water.
🔮 In November 2023, Mr Lamarre-Condon invited the witness on a trip to an off-grid cabin, but the man said he instead suggested the defendant could visit his family's farm to save money.
🔮 Beau Lamarre-Condon: … Yeah I'll tell him about the messages but I might tell a semi white lie and not say I went through his phone 😅
🔮 The Crown says Mr Lamarre-Condon waited for Mr Baird's housemates to leave that morning, and during an opening address Crown Prosecutor Brett Hatfield SC said he would invite the jury to infer the defendant spent time "steeling" himself on the street for what he was allegedly about to do.
🔮 Warning: This article contains content some readers may find distressing.
🔮 In messages between the witness and the accused from May 2023, Mr Lamarre-Condon said Mr Baird was not viewing any of his Instagram stories and that he "wanted him to see me living my best life". "I think he must have been going through it this week, his Spotify playlist is very depresso," he said in one message.
🔮 His lawyers have indicated there will be a self defence argument.
🔮 In short: A friend of former police officer Beau Lamarre-Condon has told his double murder trial he once asked her if she would help hide a body.
🔮 Beau Lamarre-Condon would go through his phone and delete contacts, the court heard, and Mr Baird told his mum that in late 2023, he had told the then-NSW Police officer he did not want to see him again.
Also by Jamie McKinnell
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 17 articles by Jamie McKinnell →

Topics

IHRA Israel Jewish NSW Sydney

Subjects

Farhat PERSON · 5× Fagan PERSON · 4× Israel GPE · 4× IHRA ORG · 3× Australian NORP · 2× Jewish NORP · 2× Mohommed Farhat PERSON · 2× Sydney GPE · 2× NSW GPE · 1× The Supreme Court ORG · 1×

Narrative

"The IHRA formulation propounds a concept different from that which 'antisemitism' has long been understood to describe and appropriates that word to the novel concept." The court concluded that Australians who strongly disapprove of Israel's treatment of Palestinians "have freedom to express their views", and others who support Israel have the right not to listen, read or engage.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-08-19
🔮 Had the application succeeded, it would have seen 55 strict conditions imposed on the 22-year-old, which would have been "highly restrictive" of his liberty.
2026-08-19 · ABC News (AU)
Graffiti 'wrongly' labelled antisemitic in Sydney spree, judge finds · assertive framing

Claims (30 extracted, 3 hedged)

In short: A man who admitted to vandalism offences in Sydney's east did not act as an "antisemitic bigot", but was a "vandal for hire", the NSW's highest court has found. asserted
court → admit → hire
The Supreme Court dismissed an application to place Mohommed Farhat under a year-long extended supervision order at the end of his jail sentence. asserted
Court → dismiss → sentence
Farhat says at the time of the offending his life "was taken over by drugs" and he did not understand the impact of his actions. asserted
he → say → actions
A man who admitted to a string of vandalism offences in Sydney's east did not act as an "antisemitic bigot" but was a "vandal for hire", and is not at risk of committing a serious terrorism offence, according to the state's highest court. uncertain
who → admit → court
The NSW Supreme Court has dismissed an application by the State to place Mohommed Farhat under a year-long extended supervision order at the expiration of his jail sentence. asserted
Court → dismiss → sentence
Had the application succeeded, it would have seen 55 strict conditions imposed on the 22-year-old, which would have been "highly restrictive" of his liberty. asserted
which → succeed → liberty
Farhat pleaded guilty to 15 offences over the vandalism at Woollahra in November 2024, when vehicles were sprayed with slogans including "F*** Israel" and "PKK coming". asserted
PKK → plead → Israel
He was previously handed a sentence of one year and eight months with an expiry date in October 2026, and the State Parole Authority revoked his statutory parole due to a finding he posed a serious, identifiable risk to the safety of the community. asserted
he → hand → community
But Farhat has long claimed he was manipulated into the crimes and motivated by promises of money and drugs. asserted
he → claim → money
A Local Court judge previously said material before that court cast some doubt on the true motivation, but made a finding that a hatred of or prejudice against Jewish people was an aggravating factor. asserted
hatred → say → people
This week, Justice Desmond Fagan found that Farhat was "incited and directed" by another person to commit his crimes for a $4,000 payment and unspecified quantity of drugs. asserted
Farhat → find → drugs
He "did not intend to express hatred of Jews", the judge said in his reasons. asserted
judge → intend → reasons
The judge also went on to find that the "f*** Israel" slogans were "objectively, crude expressions of political hostility to the state of Israel" and constituted a "curse against a foreign state". asserted
slogans → go → state
"They are not antisemitic according to the ordinary understanding of that concept in the Australian community,"Justice Fagan said. "The fact that in this case the slogans were graffitied in a locality where a high proportion of residents may be Jewish does not imbue the curse with an antisemitic character." Antisemitism definition criticised Also in his reasons, Justice Fagan noted expert opinion before the court stated the definition of exactly what constitutes antisemitism was debated. uncertain
what → accord → antisemitism
An analyst of middle eastern affairs, whose report was tendered by the Crown, made reference to a definition adopted by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA). asserted
report → tender → Alliance
But Justice Fagan said the IHRA's formulation did not assist him in Farhat's case and "does not reflect the established usage and understanding of the term 'antisemitic' in Australia". asserted
formulation → say → Australia
"The IHRA core text is so verbose and imprecise that it could not realistically be attributed to the ordinary, reasonably informed member of the Australian public," he said. uncertain
he → attribute → public
The judge said he was not the first to criticise the "inept drafting" of the IHRA formulation, noting that in a submission to the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion, the Jewish Council of Australia (JCA) also criticised the wording and cited detailed critiques by others. asserted
Council → say → others
"Discussion of the IHRA wording and adoption of it by some institutions does not change the established meaning of a word that has been in use in the English language for 150 years,"Justice Fagan said. asserted
Fagan → change → years,"Justice
"The IHRA formulation propounds a concept different from that which 'antisemitism' has long been understood to describe and appropriates that word to the novel concept." The court concluded that Australians who strongly disapprove of Israel's treatment of Palestinians "have freedom to express their views", and others who support Israel have the right not to listen, read or engage. asserted
who → propound → right
In Farhat's case, the judge found, the words "f*** Israel" were conveyed by defacing vehicles and damaging property, which meant the seriousness of the crime was "increased by its wantonness, vulgarity and intimidatory effect but not by any antisemitic implication". asserted
seriousness → find → implication
'Label has been wrongly applied' asserted
Label → apply → ?
Justice Fagan said police statements and intelligence reports had "uniformly" described Farhat's spray-painting as antisemitic, and that was then taken up by the prosecution's submissions to the Local Court "without reflection or analysis". asserted
that → say → reflection
Justice Fagan expressed the view, respectfully, that the Local Court judge made a legal error in finding that "f*** Israel" was an antisemitic phrase and reflective of hatred of prejudice towards Jewish people. asserted
Israel → express → people
The characterisation of the graffiti as being antisemitic led to Farhat being treated differently under criminal law, Justice Fagan said. asserted
Fagan → lead → law
"The label has been wrongly applied, injustice to the defendant has followed and the misconception has led to the State bringing these proceedings,"he said. asserted
State → apply → proceedings,"he
In a letter to the Local Court, Farhat previously wrote that at the time of the vandalism, he was "lost in my ways", addicted to drugs, and did not realise the gravity of his actions or the effect on others, particularly the Jewish and Turkish communities. asserted
he → write → others
He said visits from a Jewish community member had "really opened my eyes" and allowed him to look at things from the perspectives of others. asserted
him → say → others
"At the time of my offending I did not understand the deep meaning of my actions and their impact," he wrote. asserted
he → understand → actions
"My whole life was taken over by drugs and negative influences." asserted
life → take → drugs
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support