Photo via Washington Examiner

DOJ charges 18 noncitizens in North Carolina for illegal voting in 2024 election

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Deese, K. (2026, October 29). DOJ charges 18 noncitizens in North Carolina for illegal voting in 2024 election. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/4784401/doj-charges-18-noncitizens-illegal-voting-2024-election-north-carolina/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-10-29 · by Kaelan Deese

Quick Summary

The Justice Department charged 18 noncitizen individuals in North Carolina with illegally voting in the state’s 2024 election, raising the total number of such charges statewide this year to 30. This enforcement action is part of a broader federal initiative that has led to charges against approximately 160 noncitizens across the country for illegal voting and registration activities between January 2025 and September 2026.
Written by AI on 2026-10-29, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of October 29, 2026, the Justice Department has charged 18 more noncitizens in North Carolina with illegally voting in the 2024 election, raising the total number of charges statewide this year to 30. This follows a broader nationwide enforcement initiative that led to charges against approximately 160 noncitizens for illegal voting and registration offenses between January 2025 and September 2026, according to Justice Department figures. Federal officials are now warning against unlawful voting ahead of the upcoming midterm elections.

Written for “DOJ Charges Noncitizens For Voting” on 2026-10-29, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it +0.15, but all 1 of its quote(s) are attributed speech - words the article quotes from someone, not the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 115326: attributed speech only · logged 2026-10-29

Story

📰 DOJ Charges Noncitizens For Voting
Crime & Law · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 50% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Toronto Star
Hedges 8 of 38 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles describe different actions taken by the DOJ in separate states: one demanding ballot sequestration in California and another charging noncitizens with illegal voting in North Carolina.”
New York Post
Hedges 4 of 24 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different events in distinct locations with separate charges filed on different dates.”
NBC News
Hedges 2 of 24 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different events occurring in different states with distinct actions taken by the DOJ.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 3 of 33 claims Outlet record 67/100
“The articles describe different events occurring in separate states with distinct numbers of individuals involved.”
ABC News (US)
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 5 of 14 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles describe different legal actions taken by the Trump administration's Justice Department in separate states on distinct dates.”
Fox News
Hedges 5 of 28 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles describe separate incidents of noncitizens illegally voting in different states at different times.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 15 of 74 claims Outlet record 68/100
“Article A discusses the issuance of subpoenas by the Trump administration in multiple states before midterms, while Article B reports on specific charges brought against noncitizens for illegal voting in North Carolina after the subpoenas were issued.”
NBC News
Hedges 1 of 25 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different events involving distinct individuals and locations.”
The Straits Times
Hedges 3 of 14 claims Outlet record 68/100
“Article A discusses a lawsuit against an initiative to find noncitizen voters, while Article B reports on actual prosecutions of individuals for illegal voting.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 6 of 43 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different events: one involves a threat to an election official in California, while the other reports actual charges against noncitizens for illegal voting in North Carolina.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
2
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
50%
1 of 2 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
70/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-29 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 3720 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Kaelan Deese
38 article(s) here · 0 carrying a prediction
🔮 U.S. District Judge David Carter, an appointee of former President Bill Clinton, rejected the department’s request to require election officials to hold the flagged voters’ ballots until their citizenship could be verified.
🔮 Voters in six states will soon decide whether to impose or expand voter identification requirements, including rules requiring mail voters to provide part of a driver’s license or Social Security number.
🔮 Just hours after issuing what a Trump administration lawyer called an “untenable” command from the bench, a federal judge withdrew her order that would have forced the Department of Justice to refile a court brief with the names of career attorneys who agreed with it, reversing course Monday after a court hearing about golf course renovations stretched beyond six hours.
🔮 The defense argued that the prosecution relies on a novel interpretation of the law and that Van Dyke lacked fair notice that trading on the information could violate federal law.
🔮 His petition arrives as Democrats in Washington are preparing investigations for a possible return to House control in January 2027, while President Donald Trump’s allies are organizing legal defenses for officials who could be called to testify or produce records.
🔮 He warned that the proposal would damage the Public Integrity Section’s reputation, adding that officials “might as well rename the damn thing the Anti-MAGA Task Force.”
🔮 “I’m not even sure that we need to reinvent the wheel,” Delangue said at Politico‘s Decoded Summit on Sept. 16, arguing that existing cybersecurity laws may still be effective at handling mishandled or out-of-control agentic models.
2026-10-04 · assertive framing · Does rogue AI require a new rulebook?
🔮 Officials said the fundraising appeals promised donors the funds raised would support humanitarian aid for civilians in Gaza, but the money actually went to Hamas.
🔮 Prosecutors have called that overlap “precisely the problem,” arguing no court could know whether the strategy reflected Cole’s interests alone or also benefited Glover’s other client.
🔮 A federal judge restored Roger Rogoff as the top federal prosecutor in Seattle on Thursday, ruling that President Donald Trump could not fire a U.S. attorney whom district judges had appointed less than an hour earlier.
Also by Kaelan Deese
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 38 articles by Kaelan Deese →

Topics

Justice Department North Carolina’s The Justice Department

Subjects

Justice Department ORG · 1× North Carolina’s GPE · 1× The Justice Department ORG · 1×

Narrative

The Justice Department announced charges Thursday against 18 more noncitizens accused of illegally voting in North Carolina’s 2024 election, bringing the number charged statewide this year to 30 as federal officials warn against unlawful voting ahead of the midterm elections.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-29

Claims (2 extracted, 1 hedged)

The Justice Department announced charges Thursday against 18 more noncitizens accused of illegally voting in North Carolina’s 2024 election, bringing the number charged statewide this year to 30 as federal officials warn against unlawful voting ahead of the midterm elections. asserted
officials → announce → elections
The prosecutions add to a nationwide enforcement push that had resulted in charges against roughly 160 noncitizens for illegal voting and registration offenses between January 2025 and September 2026, according to Justice Department figures. uncertain
that → add → figures
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support