Photo via Washington Examiner

New York Times ‘didn’t pull their punches’ on second Dan Sullivan allegations: Sarah Bedford

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Chase, M. (2026, October 29). New York Times ‘didn’t pull their punches’ on second Dan Sullivan allegations: Sarah Bedford. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/congressional/4784285/new-york-times-mary-peltola-second-dan-sullivan-sarah-bedford/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-10-29 · by Mackenzie Chase

Quick Summary

Sarah Bedford, investigations editor at the Washington Examiner, discussed the New York Times report alleging that Democratic Senate candidate Mary Peltola’s campaign conspired to confuse voters by introducing a second candidate named Dan Sullivan. On The Hugh Hewitt Show, Bedford stated that while such allegations were suspected by many Republicans, the Times' reporting was still shocking for its detail and confirmation of suspicions.
Written by AI on 2026-10-29, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of October 29, 2026, Mary Peltola's Democratic campaign and senior officials from the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) are under investigation by the DOJ for allegedly recruiting a second candidate named Dan Sullivan, to confuse voters in Alaska's Senate race against incumbent Republican Sen. Dan S. Sullivan. The New York Times reported that this effort, which included finding individuals with the name "Dan Sullivan," aimed to sow confusion among Alaskan voters. President Donald Trump has called for Alaska to change its ballot due to this situation, deeming it unfair. Republican Governor David Becker and Senator Lisa Murkowski have also expressed concerns over what they describe as a ballot-stacking scheme, while election law experts are weighing in on the legality of having two candidates with similar names on the same ballot.

Written for “Alaska Senate Race Ballot Controversy” on 2026-10-29, grounded in this article and the 35 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it +0.35, but all 1 of its quote(s) are attributed speech - words the article quotes from someone, not the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 115163: attributed speech only · logged 2026-10-29

Story

📰 Alaska Senate Race Ballot Controversy
Politics · 36 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
CBS News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 1 of 3 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles discuss the New York Times report about Mary Peltola's campaign and a second Dan Sullivan, Article A breaks down the allegations while Article B comments on the analysis of the report by Sarah Bedford.”
CBS News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 1 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
Fox News
Hedges 1 of 24 claims Outlet record 70/100
Fox News
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 1 of 31 claims Outlet record 70/100
CBS News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
Washington Examiner
Hedges 1 of 2 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of alleged ballot-stacking tactics by Mary Peltola's campaign, but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Reason
Hedges 8 of 19 claims Outlet record 67/100
Fox News
Hedges 5 of 17 claims Outlet record 70/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 70/100
“Article A discusses the initial report about 'Decoy Dan' being a Democratic plant, while Article B analyzes and comments on that report.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
2
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 2 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
70/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
36
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-29 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 3720 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Mackenzie Chase
67 article(s) here · 0 carrying a prediction
🔮 Just before 10:15 p.m., officers responded to the area near Richmond Highway and Fuller Road to “investigate a destruction of property,” according to the Prince William County Police Department.
🔮 Washington Examiner investigations editor Sarah Bedford said there may not be a sweeping “blue wave” in the midterm elections, but Democrats could still win key races.
🔮 Washington Examiner chief political correspondent Byron York said Sunday that the immigration fraud allegations against Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) could derail her entire career if true.
🔮 San Antonio Mayor Gina Ortiz Jones also posted a statement Sunday, saying she was “deeply saddened” by news of the airman’s death. “
🔮 The November 2026 Supplemental Security Income payments, worth up to $994 for an individual filer, will be sent to recipients in 12 days.
🔮 The second round of October Social Security payments for retirees, now capped at $5,181, will be issued in three days.
🔮 The November 2026 Supplemental Security Income payments, worth up to $994 for an individual filer, will be sent to recipients in 13 days.
🔮 The second round of October Social Security payments for retirees, now capped at $5,181, will be issued in four days.
🔮 Charlie Kirk would’ve been celebrating his 33rd birthday Wednesday, as the White House called him a “Christian martyr” and a “titan” in a tribute online.
🔮 Benson said he believes that comes from “name ID” and “recency bias” but remained adamant that she would be a bad candidate.
Also by Mackenzie Chase
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 67 articles by Mackenzie Chase →

Topics

Alaska Democratic New York Times Senate Washington Examiner

Subjects

Alaska GPE · 1× Dan Sullivan PERSON · 1× Democratic NORP · 1× Democrats NORP · 1× Mary Peltola PERSON · 1× New York Times ORG · 1× Republicans NORP · 1× Sarah Bedford PERSON · 1× Senate ORG · 1× Washington Examiner ORG · 1×

Narrative

“It kind of falls into the category of something that’s not that surprising, but also completely shocking, because this was a suspicion that a lot of Republicans had that the Democrats were involved in this,” Bedford said Wednesday on The Hugh Hewitt Show.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-29

Claims (2 extracted, 0 hedged)

Washington Examiner investigations editor Sarah Bedford analyzed the New York Times report alleging that Alaska Democratic Senate candidate Mary Peltola’s campaign conspired to confuse voters with a second candidate named Dan Sullivan. asserted
campaign → analyze → candidate
“It kind of falls into the category of something that’s not that surprising, but also completely shocking, because this was a suspicion that a lot of Republicans had that the Democrats were involved in this,” Bedford said Wednesday on The Hugh Hewitt Show. asserted
Bedford → fall → Show
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support