Photo via Daily Mail

Meta bosses tried to smear academic and author who led global campaign highlighting damage of social media to young people's mental health, court documents show

Read the original at Daily Mail ↗
Cite

Churchill, D. (2026, October 29). Meta bosses tried to smear academic and author who led global campaign highlighting damage of social media to young people's mental health, court documents show. Daily Mail. https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16249779/Meta-bosses-tried-smear-academic-author.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Daily Mail · collected 2026-10-29 · by David Churchill

Quick Summary

Meta executives attempted to discredit Professor Jonathan Haidt, an academic and author who has highlighted the harmful effects of social media on young people’s mental health. Court documents revealed that in a March 8, 2023 meeting, Meta staff discussed strategies to undermine Professor Haidt's credibility by recruiting other researchers to write critical articles about him. The court case involves US school districts suing Meta over alleged harm caused by its platforms.
Written by AI on 2026-10-31, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of October 29, 2026, court documents revealed that Meta executives discussed strategies to undermine Professor Jonathan Haidt, a social psychologist at New York University, who has advocated for stricter regulations on social media due to its impact on young people's mental health. The documents show discussions about recruiting researchers to write "takedown" pieces and deploying a "whisper strategy" to discredit him ahead of the publication of his book *The Anxious Generation*. Professor Haidt led efforts that influenced Australia to implement a social media ban for children under 16, and he had briefed officials in Whitehall, contributing to similar discussions in the UK. The meeting minutes, dated March 8, 2023, indicated plans to "get the academic community to disavow Haidt" by enraging them against him.

Written for “Meta Discusses Strategy Against Haidt” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans left (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans left for article 115097 (high confidence, 2 verified quotes) · logged 2026-10-31

Story

📰 Meta Discusses Strategy Against Haidt
Politics · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 12% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Guardian
Hedges 3 of 20 claims Outlet record 66/100
New York Post
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 5 of 14 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different events: one involves Meta attempting to discredit an academic, while the other is about a legal settlement with a teenager over mental health claims.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
17
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
12%
2 of 17 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
68/100
Daily Mail's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-31 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Daily Mail · 8489 article(s) · 20 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 20 correction(s)

Who wrote this

David Churchill
22 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Amid a growing clamour for action, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said it will probe whether Meta is imposing ‘exploitative terms’ and ‘abusing’ its market position in a bid to ‘scrape’ all content from publishers who use its platforms.
🔮 It is hoped the ruling will make it easier to defeat the plans in the UK.
🔮 This could refer to Andrew Gelman, a Columbia University professor, who had been critical of Professor Haidt.
🔮 Holidaymakers face higher air fares after John Healey revealed a new 'green tax' on imported fuels could apply to jet fuel.
🔮 Seen by the Daily Mail, it raises fears the competition watchdog will fail to intervene unless given 'explicit political backing' to do so.
🔮 By comparison, less than a third (31 per cent) said they ‘strongly’ or ‘somewhat’ support the industrial action, which will see senior doctors walkout for 48 hours over November 25 and 26.
🔮 Sharon could start a fight in an empty room,' one source familiar with the guest list said.
🔮 But it began to unravel today as critics pointed out this was already the existing cap. And the Government’s impact assessment revealed ministers rejected the idea of lowering this to £80 despite being told it could ‘benefit’ drivers.
🔮 Since Labour won the 2024 election, they have also announced a new pay-per-mile levy for electric and hybrid vehicles and are planning a Fuel Duty raid in the New Year which would push up pump prices even further after they spiralled following the Iran war.
🔮 It meant that on a road where the speed limit increases, a driver may see a sign saying 60mph, but the camera recording it was still working on the basis of a previous 40mph speed limit.
Also by David Churchill
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 22 articles by David Churchill →

Topics

Australia Meta New York University Times Whitehall

Subjects

Haidt PERSON · 9× Meta ORG · 6× Australia GPE · 1× Facebook ORG · 1× Instagram ORG · 1× Jonathan Haidt PERSON · 1× Keir Starmer PERSON · 1× New York University ORG · 1× Times ORG · 1× Whitehall ORG · 1×

Narrative

Senior Meta staff discussed recruiting researchers to write ‘takedown’ pieces undermining Professor Haidt's credibility, the court documents show Professor Haidt said he was ‘not surprised’ by the emergence of the remarks made about him, uncovered in court documents The court documents relate to a case in which a coalition of school districts in the US is suing Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-31
🔮 This could refer to Andrew Gelman, a Columbia University professor, who had been critical of Professor Haidt.

Claims (17 extracted, 2 hedged)

Meta bosses tried to smear an academic and author who has led a global campaign highlighting the damage of social media to young people’s mental health, it was reported today. asserted
it → try → health
Minutes of a meeting, disclosed as part of a US court case, show the Silicon Valley giant tried to persuade the academic community to ‘disavow’ Professor Jonathan Haidt in a bid to turn the scientific community against him. asserted
giant → disclose → him
The Times reported that this was ahead of the publication of his book The Anxious Generation, which explores issues surrounding the mental health of young people. asserted
which → report → people
Senior Meta staff discussed recruiting researchers to write ‘takedown’ pieces undermining Professor Haidt's credibility, the newspaper reported. asserted
newspaper → discuss → credibility
Professor Haidt, a social psychologist at New York University, has led a global campaign highlighting the damage to children's mental health caused by smartphones and social media. asserted
Haidt → lead → smartphones
His book has become a best-seller and he played an influential role in pushing for the government in Australia to implement a social media ban for children. asserted
government → become → children
He is known to have briefed officials in Whitehall before a similar move was announced by former prime minister Sir Keir Starmer. asserted
move → know → Starmer
Senior Meta staff discussed recruiting researchers to write ‘takedown’ pieces undermining Professor Haidt's credibility, the court documents show Professor Haidt said he was ‘not surprised’ by the emergence of the remarks made about him, uncovered in court documents The court documents relate to a case in which a coalition of school districts in the US is suing Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram. asserted
which → discuss → Facebook
Minutes from a meeting on March 8, 2023, appear to refer to Curtiss Cobb, then Meta's vice-president of research. asserted
Minutes → appear → research
They say: ‘Curtiss's goal for this work: how do we get the academic community to disavow Haidt. asserted
community → say → Haidt
‘Can't co-opt them, so how do we enrage them... asserted
we → co → them
So the media finds him not credible. asserted
him → find → ?
The minutes add: ‘Get Gelman to write a takedown piece.’ asserted
Gelman → add → piece
This could refer to Andrew Gelman, a Columbia University professor, who had been critical of Professor Haidt. uncertain
who → refer → Haidt
On March 7, 2023, staff also talked about how to discredit Professor Haidt's work. asserted
staff → talk → work
One individual suggested: ‘Whisper strategy - turn academics against Haidt.’ uncertain
individual → suggest → Haidt
Professor Haidt said he was ‘not surprised’, adding: ‘It's a company seemingly determined to keep the truth from coming out, even within its own walls.’ Meta was contacted for comment. asserted
Meta → say → comment
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support